arrow left
arrow right
  • CHARLES HUSBAND VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS ASBESTOS document preview
  • CHARLES HUSBAND VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS ASBESTOS document preview
  • CHARLES HUSBAND VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS ASBESTOS document preview
  • CHARLES HUSBAND VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS ASBESTOS document preview
  • CHARLES HUSBAND VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS ASBESTOS document preview
  • CHARLES HUSBAND VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

BRAYTON@PURCELL LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 222 RUSH LANDING ROAD PO BOX 6169 NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6169 (415) 898-1855 oO em DW RH RB BH Ne NN RP RM NR RR ND Re em at on A A RP LH = SO wm RAW WN = OD DAVID R. DONADIO, ESQ., S.B. #154436 NANCY T. WILLIAMS, ESO, S.B. #201095 BRAYTON@PURCELL LLP ELECTRONICALLY Attorneys at Law , 222 Rush Landing Road F ILE D . P.O. Box 6169 Sper Gout of Cai Novato, California 94948-6169 (415) 898-1555 MAY 09 2011 Tentative Ruling Contest Email: contestasbestosTR@braytonlaw.com Clerk of the Court BY: JUDITH NUNEZ Attorneys for Plaintiff Deputy Clert SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CHARLES HUSBAND, ASBESTOS No. CGC-09-275098 Plaintiff, EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER vs. DIRECTING SERVICE OF SUMMONS ON DEFENDANT MARINE ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B+P} } ENGINEERING AND SUPPLY / COMPANY, BY DELIVERY OF PROCESS TO SECRETARY OF STATE [C.C.P. § 416.20(b); Corp, Code § 2011(b); Former Corp. Code § 3305] Date: May 10, 2011 Time: 11:00 am. Dept.: 220, Hon. Harold E. Kahn Trial Date: None Set Filing Date: March 2, 2009 Application is hereby made for an Order directing that process in the above-entitled action be served on defendant MARINE ENGINEERING AND SUPPLY COMPANY, (hereafter "defendant"), a dissolved corporation, by personally delivering to the California Secretary of State, or to an assistant or deputy Secretary of State, two copies of the BraytonPurcell LLP Master Complaint, together with two copies of the Order herein requested. Ht fit Mt KAlnjuredh 1058 SiplhAPP-EX PARTE SRV CASOS. wp 1 EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR R DIRECTING SERVICE OF SUMMONS ON DEFENDANT MARINE ENGINEERING AND ORDE} SUPPLY COMPANY, BY DELIVERY OF PROCESS TO SECRETARY OF STATEoO wm ND HA FF BH DY 1 LEGAL ARGUMENT C.C.P. § 416.20 states that a summons may be served on a corporation which has forfeited its charter to do business or has been dissolved. C.C.P. § 416.20(b), by reference to Corp. Code § 2011, provides that service may be made upon a dissolved corporation by personal delivery to the Secretary of State or to an assistant or deputy Secretary of State of the Summons, Complaint and the Order. Under C.C.P. § 416.20(b) and Corp. Code § 2011(b), this Court may order that Summons or other process be served upon defendant by personally delivering a copy thereof, together with a copy of the Order, to the Secretary of State or an assistant or deputy Secretary of State. Corp. Code § 2011 became effective January 1, 1977. This Court may still order that service upon defendant be made by personally delivering a copy thereof to the Secretary of State pursuant to the former Corp. Code § 3305. A true and correct copy of the text of former . Corp. Code § 3305 is attached to the accompanying request for judicial notice. Former Corp. Code § 3305 states in relevant part: Summons or other process against a corporation dissolved on or after August 14, 1929, may be served by delivering a copy thereof to an officer, director, or other person having charge of its assets, - or if no such person can be found, to any agent upon whom process might be served at the time of dissolution. If none of such persons can be found with due diligence and it is shown to the satisfaction of the court or judge, then the court or judge may make an order that summons or other process be served upon the dissolved corporation by delivering a copy thereof, together with a copy of the order, to the Secretary of State or to an assistant or deputy secretary of state. Under Corp. Code § 2011 and former Corp. Code § 3305 service of summons by delivery of process to the Secretary of State is proper where no person having charge of the assets of a dissolved corporation is found in the exercise of due diligence. As set forth in the accompanying declaration of Montie Derby, filed herewith, all persons having charge of such assets are if Mi ie K Aipjured\ 088 Sgk\APP-BX PARTE SRV CASOS wd 2 EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF SUMMONS ON DEFENDANT MARINE ENGINEERING AND SUPPLY COMPANY, BY DELIVERY OF PROCESS TO SECRETARY OF STATEoD eR RH R WN now deceased, and plaintiff has not been able to locate any such other person in the exercise of due diligence. (See Declaration of Montie Derby, filed herewith.) Dated: g Le Mt BRAYTON*PURCELL LLP By: ancy T. Williams Attorneys for Plaintiff K Nlalucedh i081 Sgld\APP-EX PARTE SRV CASOS.wpd 3. EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF SUMMONS ON DEFENDANT MARINE ENGINEERING AND SUPPLY COMPANY, BY DELIVERY OF PROCESS TO SECRETARY OF STATE