arrow left
arrow right
  • CHARLES HUSBAND VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS ASBESTOS document preview
  • CHARLES HUSBAND VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS ASBESTOS document preview
  • CHARLES HUSBAND VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS ASBESTOS document preview
  • CHARLES HUSBAND VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

BRAYTON®PURCELL LLP ATTORNEYS ATLAW 222 RUSH LANDING ROAD. POBOX6169 NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6169 (415) 898-1555 _ Co ON DH & WB NY ALAN R. BRAYTON, ESQ, S.B. #73685 DAVID R. DONADIO, ESQ., S.B. #154436 UMU K. TAFISI, ESQ., $.B. #269862 ELECTRONICALLY BRAYTON*PURCELL LLP Attorneys at Law FILED 222 Rush Landing Road Superior Court of California, P.O. Box 6169 County of San Francisco Novato, California 94948-6169 SEP 29 2011 (415) 898-1555 Clerk of the Court Tentative Ruling Contest Email: contestasbestosTR@braytonlaw.com sy: WILLIAM eupex Deputy Cle Attorneys for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CHARLES HUSBAND, ASBESTOS No. CGC-09-275098 Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF'S INDEX OF NON- vs. CALIFORNIA AUTHORITIES CITED IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT ALBAY ) CONSTRUCTION COMPANY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B#P) Date: October 13, 2011 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept: 220, Hon. Harold Kahn Trial Date: November 14, 2011 Action Filed: March 2, 2009 Plaintiff submits the following index of non-California authorities to be lodged with the Court in support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant ALBAY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY’s Motion for Summary Judgment Or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication in the above-captioned matter. CITED NON-CALIFORNIA CASES 1. Galloway v. U.S. (1943) 319 U.S. 372 2. Logerquist v. McVey (Arizona 2000) 196 Ariz. 470, 1 P.3d 113 it MH K Aljured\1050 5\pind-non-cal-case-opp-ALBAY wpd 1 UKT PLAINTIFF'S INDEX OF NON-CALIFORNIA AUTHORITIES CITED IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT ALBAY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION3. Talley v, Mitchell (6" Cir. 1960) 275 F.2d 244 Dates 1/24 / 0 BRAYTON®PURCELL LLP By: iy Umu K. Tafisi Attorneys for Plaintiff KAtpjuredh 10581 Sip!eind-non cal PLAINTIFF'S INDEX OF | RON CALIFORNIA AUTHORITIES CITED IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT ALBAY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION T