Preview
ICA
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Apr-15-2009 9:38 am
Case Number: CGC-09-486663
Filing Date: Apr-14-2009 8:32
Juke Box: 001 Image: 02465834
ON COMPLAINT DECLARATION OF DILIGENCE, PROOF OF SER’
CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE OF VS. LLOYD E TURNER et
001002465834
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.seth
Attorney or Party without Attorney:
Brian N. Winn, Bar #86779
Winn Law Group, A Professional Corp.
The Chapman Building
110 E. Wilshire Avenue, Suite 212
Fullerton, CA 928:
decepnone Na: Tit 4
bad No. TH 46-6680 “on i -
Ref. No. or File No.: 2 a a Db
Attorney for: Plaintiff a eet
08-32742-0 Francigco Cpunty Superior Con”
Insert name of Court, and Judicial District and Branch Court:
Superior Court of San Francisco County/San Francisco
Plaintiff: Cavatry Portfolio Services, LLC, et al.
(Defendant: Lloyd E Turner, et al.
1, At the time of service | was at least 18 years of age and not a party to this action.
2. [served copies of the Summons and Complaint; Declaration re Venue.
3. a. Party served: Lloyd E Turner aka LLoyd Eugene Turner aka Lloyd Turner
8. Person served: Gene Turner, brother and occupant, White, Male, 60 Years Old, Black Hair, 5 Feet
II Inches, 195 Pounds
4, Address where the party was served: 2462 36th Ave
San Francisco, Ca 94116
5. 1 served the party: .
b, by substituted service. On: Thu., Apr. 02, 2009 at: 7:33PM I left the documents listed in item 2 with or in the presence of:
Gene Turner, brother and occupant
(2) (Home)Competent Member of the Household over 18.1 informed him or her of the general nature of the papers.
(4) A declaration of mailing is attached,
(5) Lanach a declaration of diligence stating actions taken first to attempt personal service.
6. The "Notice to the Person Served" (on the Summons) was completed as follows:
a. as an individual defendant
7. Person Who Served Papers: Recoverable Cost Per CCP 1033.5(a4)(B)
a. Kraig Vorsatz d. The Fee for Service was: $55.00
atx ty LEGAL EXPRESS LTD. . ! ist iforni:
L E G AL PS Re 1831 HARTMAN LW e. Tam: (3) regis fered California process server
4 ie Ps} P 0. BOX 808001 () Independent Contractor
alae a hte ii prone roiscsens (i) Registration No: 237
LIMITED FAX 707-765-6762 (iii) County: San Mateo
8 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing ts true and correct.
Date:
Tue, Apr. 07, 2009
nate PTS USL WE Seneary te S007 PROOF QEGERVICE
win. 183681Brian N. Winn, Bar #86779 _
Winn Law Group, A Professional Corp. Ww :
The Chapman Building W
110 E. Wilshire Avenue, Suite 212 san Fraifesf “yy 903
Fullerton, CA 92832 RE “V4 cle’
Telephone No: 114 446-6686 FAX No: 714 446-6680 -—
4
At
Ref. No or File No: Gory) Wee Li Cee
08-32742-0 _
ae
Attorney for: Plaintiff
Insert name of Court, and
dicial District and Bra ourt:
Superior Court of San Francisco County/San Francisco
Plainng: Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC, et al.
Defendant: Lloyd E Turner, et al.
Case Number:
meSpywan Pe Pe
By Mail CGC-09-486663
“1, Lam over the age of 18 and not a party to this action. I am employed in the county where the mailing occurred.
2. I served copies of the Summons and Complaint; Declaration re Venue.
3. By placing a true copy of each document in the United States mail, in a sealed envelope by First Class mail with postage prepaid
as follows:
a. Date of Mailing: Tue., Apr. 07, 2009
b. Place of Mailing: Petaluma, Ca 94975
c. Addressed as follows: Lifoyd E Turner aka LLoyd Eugene Turner aka Lloyd Turner
2462 36th Ave
San Francisco, Ca 94116
4, 1am readily famitiar with the business practice for collection and processing of correspondence as deposited with the U.S. Postal
Service on Tue., Apr. 07, 2009 in the ordinary course of business.
5. Person Serving: Recoverable Cost Per CCP 1033.5(a(4}B)
a.Toanna Asimos a. The Fee for Service was: $55.00
b. Legal Express Limited e. Lam: (3) registered California process server
P.O. Box 808001 () Independent Contractor
Petaluma, Ca 94975 (i) RegistrationNo.: 1S
¢. 707 765-6765, FAX 707-765-6762 (iii) County: Marin
8 Idectare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true anf/correct.
Date:
Tue, Apr. 07, 2009
Rule STERN AEP Sanbaey 1.2007 PROOR ORM ICE
win, 183681| Attorndy or Party without Atte
Brian N. Winn, Bar #86779
The Chapman Building
Fullerian, CA Q7829
Telephone No: 714 446-6686
Defendant:
d E Turner, et al,
Winn Law Group, A Professional Corp.
110 E. Wilshire Avenue, Suite 212
FAX: No: 714 446-6680
insert name of Court, and Judictal District and Branch Court:
Superior Court of San Francisco County/San Francisco
Plaintig: Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC, et al.
2. Documents: | Summons and Complaint; Declaration re Venue..
Day Date Time
Mon 03/30/09 = 9:48pm
Tue 03/31/09 = 7:56pm
Wed 04/0109 = 9:09am
Thu 04/02/09 7:33pm
3. Person Executing
a. Kraig Vorsatz
b. Legat Express Limited
P.O. Box 808001
Petaluma, Ca 94975
Location
Home
Home
Home
Home
¢. 707 765-6765, FAX 707-765-6762
4. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct,
Date: Tue, Apr. 07, 2009
Results
TL NO wn Tite Sane
08-32742-0
‘a
mw tL Bet
h#
enn
No answer at the residence address.; Attempt made by: Kraig Vorsatz. Attempt at:
2462 36th Ave San Francisco Ca 94116.
No answer at the residence address.; Attempt made by: Kraig Vorsatz. Attempt at:
2462 36th Ave San Francisco Ca 94116.
No answer at the residence address.; Attempt made by: Kraig Vorsatz. Attempt at:
2462 36th Ave San Francisco Ca 94116.
Substituted Service effected by leaving copy of the document(s) with; Gene Turner,
brother and occupant. The defendant's business address is unknown.; Attempt made
by: Kraig. Vorsatz, Attempt at: 2462 36th Ave San Francisco Ca 94116,
Due Diligence
Recoverable Costs Per CCP 1033.5(aX4B)
a, The Fee for service was: $55.00
e. Lam: (3) registered California process server
(i) Independent Contractor
(ii) Registration No.: 237
(iti) County: San Mateo
(Kraig Volsatz)
win.183681“F.
4
Legal Express Limited
P.O. Box 808001
Petaluma, Ca. 94975
707-765-6765 phone
707-765-6762 fax
IN THE ISSUE OF DUE DILIGENCE IN SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
This jurisdiction holds that reasonable diligence requires that there be attempt at personal
service on at least three separate calendar day. At least one of these attempts must be
made at the residence address, if known. If the residence address is unknown, the
declarant must so state. The attempts on the calendar days should be made a time when
the person might be home regardless of his or her work schedule which might be day
shift, swing shift or night shift. These attempts might also take into consideration that
commute time might be involved before and after work. This, if a person works the day
shift between 8:00am and 5:00pm, service might be attempted before 7:00am or after
6:00pm. Ifa person works the swing shift between 3:00pm and 12:00 midnight, service
might be attempted in the early afternoon. If plaintiff is ignorant of both the residence
address and the works schedule of defendant reasonable attempts should be made to serve
the defendant in the early morning, midmoming, and early afternoon and/or after dinner,
at his place of his business (see worksheet below). There must be a declaration of due
diligence submitted with the proof of service stating that there were such attempts at
personal service before substituted service was made, the server having taken into
consideration the 3 possible works shifts. At a business where direct contact with an
employee in not permitted the process server may make substitute service without the
prior attempts, but it must be stated on the proof of service that company policy does not
allow personal service and also the defendant’s residence is unknown. If the residence
address is known attempts must be made there before service can be completed at the
business. AGAIN, if the plaintiff is ignorant of the residence address of the defendant,
this fact must appear in any “due diligence” declaration. Providing the various work
shifts have been taken into consideration, the sub-service may be affected on the third
attempt.
Substitute Service Worksheet Charge (check one box in each column)
Work shift 1 Work shift IT Work shift II
8am-Spm. 3pm-12am 11pm-8am
Work
Business Business Business.
notknown
9am-10pm
Preview
ICA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Apr-15-2009 9:38 am Case Number: CGC-09-486663 Filing Date: Apr-14-2009 8:32 Juke Box: 001 Image: 02465834 ON COMPLAINT DECLARATION OF DILIGENCE, PROOF OF SER’ CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC, AS ASSIGNEE OF VS. LLOYD E TURNER et 001002465834 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.seth Attorney or Party without Attorney: Brian N. Winn, Bar #86779 Winn Law Group, A Professional Corp. The Chapman Building 110 E. Wilshire Avenue, Suite 212 Fullerton, CA 928: decepnone Na: Tit 4 bad No. TH 46-6680 “on i - Ref. No. or File No.: 2 a a Db Attorney for: Plaintiff a eet 08-32742-0 Francigco Cpunty Superior Con” Insert name of Court, and Judicial District and Branch Court: Superior Court of San Francisco County/San Francisco Plaintiff: Cavatry Portfolio Services, LLC, et al. (Defendant: Lloyd E Turner, et al. 1, At the time of service | was at least 18 years of age and not a party to this action. 2. [served copies of the Summons and Complaint; Declaration re Venue. 3. a. Party served: Lloyd E Turner aka LLoyd Eugene Turner aka Lloyd Turner 8. Person served: Gene Turner, brother and occupant, White, Male, 60 Years Old, Black Hair, 5 Feet II Inches, 195 Pounds 4, Address where the party was served: 2462 36th Ave San Francisco, Ca 94116 5. 1 served the party: . b, by substituted service. On: Thu., Apr. 02, 2009 at: 7:33PM I left the documents listed in item 2 with or in the presence of: Gene Turner, brother and occupant (2) (Home)Competent Member of the Household over 18.1 informed him or her of the general nature of the papers. (4) A declaration of mailing is attached, (5) Lanach a declaration of diligence stating actions taken first to attempt personal service. 6. The "Notice to the Person Served" (on the Summons) was completed as follows: a. as an individual defendant 7. Person Who Served Papers: Recoverable Cost Per CCP 1033.5(a4)(B) a. Kraig Vorsatz d. The Fee for Service was: $55.00 atx ty LEGAL EXPRESS LTD. . ! ist iforni: L E G AL PS Re 1831 HARTMAN LW e. Tam: (3) regis fered California process server 4 ie Ps} P 0. BOX 808001 () Independent Contractor alae a hte ii prone roiscsens (i) Registration No: 237 LIMITED FAX 707-765-6762 (iii) County: San Mateo 8 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing ts true and correct. Date: Tue, Apr. 07, 2009 nate PTS USL WE Seneary te S007 PROOF QEGERVICE win. 183681Brian N. Winn, Bar #86779 _ Winn Law Group, A Professional Corp. Ww : The Chapman Building W 110 E. Wilshire Avenue, Suite 212 san Fraifesf “yy 903 Fullerton, CA 92832 RE “V4 cle’ Telephone No: 114 446-6686 FAX No: 714 446-6680 -— 4 At Ref. No or File No: Gory) Wee Li Cee 08-32742-0 _ ae Attorney for: Plaintiff Insert name of Court, and dicial District and Bra ourt: Superior Court of San Francisco County/San Francisco Plainng: Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC, et al. Defendant: Lloyd E Turner, et al. Case Number: meSpywan Pe Pe By Mail CGC-09-486663 “1, Lam over the age of 18 and not a party to this action. I am employed in the county where the mailing occurred. 2. I served copies of the Summons and Complaint; Declaration re Venue. 3. By placing a true copy of each document in the United States mail, in a sealed envelope by First Class mail with postage prepaid as follows: a. Date of Mailing: Tue., Apr. 07, 2009 b. Place of Mailing: Petaluma, Ca 94975 c. Addressed as follows: Lifoyd E Turner aka LLoyd Eugene Turner aka Lloyd Turner 2462 36th Ave San Francisco, Ca 94116 4, 1am readily famitiar with the business practice for collection and processing of correspondence as deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on Tue., Apr. 07, 2009 in the ordinary course of business. 5. Person Serving: Recoverable Cost Per CCP 1033.5(a(4}B) a.Toanna Asimos a. The Fee for Service was: $55.00 b. Legal Express Limited e. Lam: (3) registered California process server P.O. Box 808001 () Independent Contractor Petaluma, Ca 94975 (i) RegistrationNo.: 1S ¢. 707 765-6765, FAX 707-765-6762 (iii) County: Marin 8 Idectare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true anf/correct. Date: Tue, Apr. 07, 2009 Rule STERN AEP Sanbaey 1.2007 PROOR ORM ICE win, 183681| Attorndy or Party without Atte Brian N. Winn, Bar #86779 The Chapman Building Fullerian, CA Q7829 Telephone No: 714 446-6686 Defendant: d E Turner, et al, Winn Law Group, A Professional Corp. 110 E. Wilshire Avenue, Suite 212 FAX: No: 714 446-6680 insert name of Court, and Judictal District and Branch Court: Superior Court of San Francisco County/San Francisco Plaintig: Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC, et al. 2. Documents: | Summons and Complaint; Declaration re Venue.. Day Date Time Mon 03/30/09 = 9:48pm Tue 03/31/09 = 7:56pm Wed 04/0109 = 9:09am Thu 04/02/09 7:33pm 3. Person Executing a. Kraig Vorsatz b. Legat Express Limited P.O. Box 808001 Petaluma, Ca 94975 Location Home Home Home Home ¢. 707 765-6765, FAX 707-765-6762 4. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct, Date: Tue, Apr. 07, 2009 Results TL NO wn Tite Sane 08-32742-0 ‘a mw tL Bet h# enn No answer at the residence address.; Attempt made by: Kraig Vorsatz. Attempt at: 2462 36th Ave San Francisco Ca 94116. No answer at the residence address.; Attempt made by: Kraig Vorsatz. Attempt at: 2462 36th Ave San Francisco Ca 94116. No answer at the residence address.; Attempt made by: Kraig Vorsatz. Attempt at: 2462 36th Ave San Francisco Ca 94116. Substituted Service effected by leaving copy of the document(s) with; Gene Turner, brother and occupant. The defendant's business address is unknown.; Attempt made by: Kraig. Vorsatz, Attempt at: 2462 36th Ave San Francisco Ca 94116, Due Diligence Recoverable Costs Per CCP 1033.5(aX4B) a, The Fee for service was: $55.00 e. Lam: (3) registered California process server (i) Independent Contractor (ii) Registration No.: 237 (iti) County: San Mateo (Kraig Volsatz) win.183681“F. 4 Legal Express Limited P.O. Box 808001 Petaluma, Ca. 94975 707-765-6765 phone 707-765-6762 fax IN THE ISSUE OF DUE DILIGENCE IN SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY This jurisdiction holds that reasonable diligence requires that there be attempt at personal service on at least three separate calendar day. At least one of these attempts must be made at the residence address, if known. If the residence address is unknown, the declarant must so state. The attempts on the calendar days should be made a time when the person might be home regardless of his or her work schedule which might be day shift, swing shift or night shift. These attempts might also take into consideration that commute time might be involved before and after work. This, if a person works the day shift between 8:00am and 5:00pm, service might be attempted before 7:00am or after 6:00pm. Ifa person works the swing shift between 3:00pm and 12:00 midnight, service might be attempted in the early afternoon. If plaintiff is ignorant of both the residence address and the works schedule of defendant reasonable attempts should be made to serve the defendant in the early morning, midmoming, and early afternoon and/or after dinner, at his place of his business (see worksheet below). There must be a declaration of due diligence submitted with the proof of service stating that there were such attempts at personal service before substituted service was made, the server having taken into consideration the 3 possible works shifts. At a business where direct contact with an employee in not permitted the process server may make substitute service without the prior attempts, but it must be stated on the proof of service that company policy does not allow personal service and also the defendant’s residence is unknown. If the residence address is known attempts must be made there before service can be completed at the business. AGAIN, if the plaintiff is ignorant of the residence address of the defendant, this fact must appear in any “due diligence” declaration. Providing the various work shifts have been taken into consideration, the sub-service may be affected on the third attempt. Substitute Service Worksheet Charge (check one box in each column) Work shift 1 Work shift IT Work shift II 8am-Spm. 3pm-12am 11pm-8am Work Business Business Business. notknown 9am-10pm