arrow left
arrow right
  • PAUL VAN DEGRIFT VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • PAUL VAN DEGRIFT VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • PAUL VAN DEGRIFT VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • PAUL VAN DEGRIFT VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

INE BROWN, IB., ESQ., Bar No. 079824 MICHELLE M. CAMMARATA, ESQ., Bar No, 250238 2) BROWN EASSA & MCLEOD LLP 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1800 ELECTRONICALLY | 3 |) Oakland, California 94612-3520 FILED Telephone: 510.444.3131 Superior Court of California, 4) Pacsimile: 510.839.7940 County of San Francisco 5 | at for Defendant MAR 17 2011 orneys for Defendam TOSCO REFINING COMPANY INC. OF sot eons 6 Deputy Clerk 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 0 1) PAUL VAN DEGRIFT, Case No. CGC-09-275076 2 Plaintifl, NOTICE OF CHANGE OF FIRM NAME 13 vy 4) ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS. 5 Defendants. 6 17 NOTICE is hereby given that effective February 1, 2011, the firm of FILICE BROWN & | BASSA & MCLEOD LLP, has changed its name fo, BROWN EASSA & MCLEOD LLP. The 9 | address and telephone number are-unchanged. 20 at 21 4 Dated: March 2011 BROWN EASSA & MCLEOD LLP 2 —, 4 eo 23 By: - agi et SUGENE BROWN, JR. 24 MICHELLE M. CAMMARATA. i . Attorneys for Defendant 25 TOSCO REFINING COMPANY, INC. 26 27 28 | dsvaz or? TNEVILLE 683165.11 PROOF OF SERVICE Paul Van DeGrift v, Asbestos Defendants- Tosco Refining Company, Inc. | | | | 2 San Francisco Superior Court Docket Number: CGC-09-275076 3 I, Terry Neville, am.a citizen of the United States, over 18 years of age and not party to the within action. Lam employed'in the county of Alameda; my business address is 1999 Harrison 4 | Steet, 18" Ploor, Oakland, CA 94612. 3 On the date listed below, | served the within document: 6 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF FIRM NAME 7 | onall parties in this action, as.addressed below, by causing a true copy thereof to be distributed.as follows: 8 : 9 | BRAYTON PURCELL LUP BERRY & BERRY | | 222 RUSH LANDING ROAD 2930 LAKESHORE AVENUE { 10 | P.O. BOX 6169 P.O. BOX 16070 NOVATO, CA 94948-6169 OAKLAND, CA 94610 il (VLA LEXIS NEXIS TO ALL DEFENSE COUNSEL] | 12 [] BY MAIL: bam “readily familiar’ with the firm’s practice of collection 3 and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. Postal service.on 14 t that same. day with postage thereon fully prepaid in. the : ordinary course of business, | am aware that on motion of is the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal 4 cancellation date or postage meter data is more than one.day: 16 after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. | 7 | LL} VIACHAND DELIVERY: L caused such envelope, to be hand delivered to the stated 18 I parties by an agent of INTERCEPTOR. t VIA ELECTRONIC Leaused a true and correct copy of such documents to be 19 [ X] SERVICE: electronically served on counsel of record by transmission 20 to Lexis-Nexis File and Serve, I declare under penalty.of perjury under the laws of the State of California thatthe foregoing is 21 | true and correct. 22 Executed on March: