On June 20, 2011 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
Alber, William Francis,
Northern California Collection Service, Inc.,
and
Alber, William Francis,
Does 1 To 10,
W.F. Albert Seafoods, Inc,
William Francis Alber As An Individual And Dba,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
IN
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Jun-10-2013 1:49 pm
Case Number: CGC-11-511811
Filing Date: Jun-04-2013 1:48
Filed by: SHAWNA VANTREE
Juke Box: 001 Image: 04085902
DEFAULT COURT JUDGMENT - GENERAL
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA COLLECTION SERVICE, INC. VS. WILLIAM FRANCIS
ALBER AS AN INDIVIDUAL AND DBA et al
00104085902
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.1e
JUD-100
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, state bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
STEVEN D. CRIBB - SB #206232
[ANDRE J. LELIEVRE - SB #166974
700 LEISURE LANE
SACRAMENTO, CA. 95815
TELEPHONENO; (916) 929-0130 FAxNo.(Optinay: (916) 929-4890
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional):
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): PLAINTIFE .
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO San Francisco County Superior C
STREET ADDRESS. 40(Q MCALLISTER STREET
NAILING ADDRESS JUN 0 4 2013
ciryanozip cove’ SAN FRANCISCO, CA. 94103 -
BRANCHNAME. UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE CLERK.OF THE-COUR
PLAINTIFF: NORTHERN CALIFORNIA COLLECTION SERVICE, INC. BY: Pues ee
DEFENDANT: WILLIAM FRANCIS ALBER, et al
JUDGMENT CASE NUMBER:
[| By Clerk X_] By Default (__} After Court Trial coc 11-511811
Cx] By Court (_} On Stipulation {"] Defendant Did Not
Appear at Trial
JUDGMENT
BY DEFAULT
a. Defendant was properly served with a copy of the summons and complaint.
b. Defendant failed to answer the complaint or appear and defend the action within the time allowed by law.
c. Defendant's default was entered by the clerk upon plaintiffs application.
d. |__| Clerk's Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(a)). Defendant was sued only on a contract or judgment of a court of
this state for the recovery of money.
e. [|X _] Court Judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(b)). The court considered
(1) [xc] plaintiffs testimony and other evidence.
(2) plaintiff's written declaration (Code Civ. Proc., § 585(d)).
2. [| ON STIPULATION
a. Plaintiff and defendant agreed (stipulated) that a judgment be entered in this case. The court approved the stipulated
judgment and
b. [_] the signed written stipulation was filed in the case.
c. [_] the stipulation was stated in open court [J the stipulation was stated on the record.
3. [__] AFTER COURT TRIAL. The jury was waived. The court considered the evidence.
a. The case was tried on (date and time):
before (name of judicial officer):
b. Appearances by:
{-_] Plaintiff (name each): [__] Plaintiffs attorney (name each):
(1) (1)
(2) (2)
{]} Continued on Attachment 3b.
{_} Defendant (name each): [__} Defendant's attorney (name each):
(1) (1)
(2) (2)
{_] Continued on Attachment 3b.
c. [_] Defendant did not appear at trial, Defendant was properly served with notice of trial.
d. ["_] Astatement of decision (Code Civ. Proc., § 632) [| wasnot [|] was requested.
Page 1 of 2
Fore ape or Opera se JUDGMENT soffit s
th Dus
JUD-100 [New January 1, 2002]
Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 585, 664.6|_ PLAINTIFF: NORTHERN CALIFORNIA COLLECTION SERVICE, INC. CASE NUMBER:
cGc 11-511811
DEFENDANT: WILLIAM FRANCIS ALBER, et al
JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AS FOLLOWS BY: Cx] THE couRT |__] THE CLERK
4. [__) Stipulated Judgment. Judgment is entered according to the stipulation of the parties.
5. Parties. Judgment is
a. (XJ for plaintiff (name each): NORTHERN CALIFORNIA c. L_] for cross-complainant (name each):
COLLECTION SERVICE, INC.
and against defendant (names): WILLIAM FRANCIS and against cross-defendant (name each):
ALBER, AS AN INDIVIDUAL AND DBA ALBERT
SEAFOODS; AND W.F. ALBERT SEAFOODS, INC.
Continued on Attachment 5a. [| Continued on Attachment Sc.
b. __] for defendant (name each): d. L_] for cross-defendant (name each):
6. Amount.
a. |X _]| Defendant named in item 5a above must c. (__] Cross-defendant named in item 5c above must pay
pay plaintiff on the complaint: cross-complainant on the cross-complaint:
(1) Lx] Damages $177,554.91 (1) (J Damages $ 0.00
(2) [x] Prejudgment $ 40,225.28 (2) LJ Prejudgment $ 0.00
interest at the interest at the
annual rate of 108 % annual rate of %
(3) Lx) Attorney fees $ 1,000.00 3) [7] Attorney fees $ 0.00
Costs $ 575.00 (4) (] Costs $ 0.00
(8) (| Other (specify): $ 0.00 (5) [_] Other (specify): $ 0.00
(6) TOTAL $219,355.19 (6) TOTAL $ 0.00
b. [_] Plaintiff to receive nothing from defendant d [] Cross-complainant to receive nothing from
named in item 5b. cross-defendant named in item 5d.
(__] Defendant named in item 5b to recover (“] Cross-defendant named in item 5d to recover
costs $ 0.00 costs $ 0.00
and attorney fees $ 0.00 L_] and attorney fees $0.00
7. [__] Other (specify):
eee 1d ;) 7) eV
Date: “ft 3 o
1A OFF
., DONALBSSutuvan
Date: (J Clerk, by a , Deputy
(LHC)
(SEAL) CLERK'S CERTIFICATE (Optional)
| certify that this is a true copy of the original judgment on file in the court.
Date:
Clerk, by , Deputy
Page 2 of 2
‘JUD-100 [New January 1, 2002] JUDGMENT
Document Filed Date
June 04, 2013
Case Filing Date
June 20, 2011
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.