arrow left
arrow right
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview 
						
                                
Preview

                                CHRISTOPHER B. BRUNI, SBN 116521
ROBERT W. LAWTON, SBN 259779

SINUN U BRUNI UEP 0 ELECTRONICALLY
333 Pine Street, Suite
San Francisco, CA 94104-3311 FILED ©
Telephone: 415.362.9700 Superior Court of California
Facsimile: 415.362.9707 County of San Francisco
ebruni@sinunubruni.com DEC 02 2009
tlawton@sinunubruni.com GORDON PARK-LI, Clark
BY: ALISON AGBAY
Attorneys for Defendant Deputy Cle:

TIMEC COMPANY, INC.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO-UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

JOYCE JUELCH and y Case No.: 275212
NORMAN JUELCH SR., )
: ) DEFENDANT TIMEC COMPANY, INC.’S|
Plaintiff. ) JOINDER TO KAISER GYPSUM
° ) COMPANY INC.’S CONDITIONAL NON-
v ) OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’
} PIEFERCNCE IN SETIING CASI FOR
ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS, TRIAL, AND EXTENDING DISCOVERY
CUTOFF [C.C.P. §36(4)]
Defendants.

Date: December 22, 2009

Time: 9:30 a.m.

Dept.: 206—The Hon. James J. McBride
Trial Date: N/A

Filing Date: May 20, 2009

ee

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant TIMEC COMPANY, INC. (“TIMEC”)
hereby joins in the CONDITIONAL NON-OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
ORDER GRANTING PREFERCNCE IN SETTING CASE FOR TRIAL, AND
EXTENDING DISCOVERY CUTOFF, filed by its co-defendant KAISER GYPSUM

1

DEFENDANT TIMEC COMPANY INC.’S JOINDER TO KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC.’S CONDITIONAL
NON-OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ORDER GRANTING PREFERCNCE IN SETTING CASE FOR
TRIAL, AND EXTENDING DISCOVERY CUTOFF(“KAISER”). This motion is to be heard on December 22, 2009 in Dept. 206 before the
Honorable Judge James McBride.

For purposes of this Joinder, Defendant TIMEC hereby adopts and incorporates by
reference KAISER’S CONDITIONAL NON-OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR ORDER GRANTING PREFERCNCE IN SETTING CASE FOR TRIAL, AND
EXTENDING DISCOVERY CUTOFF papers as if their own. Plaintiffs will not be
prejudiced by this Joinder because they have already been provided reasonable and legally

sufficient notice of the motion and the scheduled hearing date.

Dated: December 1, 2009

IMEC COMPANY, INC.

2

DEFENDANT TIMEC COMPANY INC.’S JOINDER TO KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC.’S CONDITIONAL
NON-OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ORDER GRANTING PREFERCNCE IN SETTING CASE FOR,
TRIAL, AND EXTENDING DISCOVERY CUTOFFPROOF OF SERVICE

Joyce Juelch and Norman Juelch vy. Asbestos Defendants (B*P)
San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-09-275212

I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the above-captioned matter.
My business address is 333 Pine Street, Suite 400, San Francisco, California 94104-3311,
where the service described below took place on the date set forth below.

Person(s) Served:

Electronic Service: On the date executed below, I electronically served the
document(s) via LexisNexis File & Serve described below on recipients designated
x on the Transaction Receipt located on the LexisNexis File & Serve website.

Document(s) Served:

DEFENDANT TIMEC COMPANY, INC.’S JOINDER TO KAISER GYPSUM
COMPANY INC.’S CONDITIONAL NON-OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR ORDER GRANTING PREFERCNCE IN SETTING CASE

FOR TRIAL, AND EXTENDING DISCOVERY CUTOFF [C.C.P. §36(d)]
Manner of Service:

Personal Service: I caused a copy of each document served to be hand delivered
to each person served pursuant to CCP § 1011. If required, the actual server’s
original Proof of Service will be filed with the Court.

Mail: I am readily familiar with my employer’s practice for the collection and
processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service:

such correspondence is deposited with the United States Postal Service on the same
day in the ordinary course of business in the county where I work. On the date set
forth below, at my place of business, following ordinary business practices, I placed -
for collection and mailing by deposit in the United States Postal Service a copy of
each document served, enclosed in a sealed envelope, with postage thereon fully
prepaid, each envelope being addressed to one of the person(s) served, in
accordance with C.C.P. § 1013{a).

Facsimile: On the date set forth below, I transmitted the document(s) served via

facsimile transmission to the facsimile number(s) set forth above. A confirmation
report was generated confirming completed delivery of the same. A copy of the
confirmation report is on file and available for inspection and copying upon
request.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Dated: December 2, 2009
Are! echner

PROOF OF SERVICE