arrow left
arrow right
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview 
						
                                
Preview

                                |
|

1) BUGE
DAVID A. PERE

f BROWN, JRO(SBN: 079824)
A (SBN+237982)

2 | FILICE BROWN EASSA & MCLEOD LLP i
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1800 ELECTRONICALLY |
3 1 Oakland, Califarnia 94612-3520 FILED |
Telephone: (510) 444-3131 Superior Court of Californi
4 |) Facsimile: (510) 839-7940 peri Court of Calf
3 | Attorneys for Defendant FEB 24 2010 |
TOSCO REFINING COMPANY, INC. BY. CHRISTE ARRIOLA |
6 Deputy Clerk
8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO :
10
IL | JOYCE JUELCH AND NORMAN CASENO, CGC09-275212
JUELCH, SR,
12 PROOF OF SERVICE
Plaintiffs,
3
ve
14
ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP),
18 | |
i Defendants.
6 osc nnsninnnata nenniutnaieiennpeemaneenenatnsensneneentenieynnnee—ntaannnanannainnn
7
18
9
20
a1
2
23
24
25
26 i
|
27 |
/
et a wl
PROOF OF SERVIC 'E&M

rou pata,
eisa srasce
antic Feoos
eA Ma LSH
sede

PROOF OF SERVICE

JOYCE JUELCH AND NORMAN JUELCH, SR. v. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP
(POSCO REFINING COMPANY)
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. CGC 09-275212

1, MARIE HERNANDEZ, hereby declare:

Tam a citizen of the United States, over 18 years of age and not a party to the within action.
1am employed in the County of Alameda: my business address is Lake Merritt Plaza, 1999
Harrison Street, Kightcenth Floor, Oakland, CA 94612-3541.

On the date listed below, | served the within:

I. TOSCO REFINING COMPANY'S NOTICE GF MOTION AND MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT;

2. MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPO.

TOR TOSCO
REFINING COMPANY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDG 5

3

3. SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT
OF TOSCO REFINING COMPANY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;

4, DECLARATION OF DAVID A. PEREDA IN SUPPORT OF TOSCO REFINING
COMPANY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;

DECLARATION OF JOEL COHEN IN SUPPORT OF TOSCO REFINING
COMPANY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;

6. ORDER GRANTING TOSCO REFINING COMPANY'S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

a

on all parties in this action, as.addressed below, by causing a true copy thereof to be distributed as
follows:

ALL COUNSEL VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION
[SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST]

QO BY MATL: 1am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practi
formailing. Under that practice it would be depos
thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business 8
service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date-is more than one day after date of
deposit for nailing in affidavit,

o BY HAND DELIVERY: 1 caused such envelope, to be hand delivered (via Interceptor Legal

Services) to the stated parties.

of collection and processing correspondence

VIA FACSIMILE: I caused such documents to be transmitted via fax to. the stated parties at their
respective facsimile numbers.

VIA ELECTRONIC SERVICE: | caused 2 true and correct copy of such docwnents to be

electronically served on counsel of record by transmission to Lexis-Nexis File and Serve.

fi

05022 24977 MRI

PROOF OF SERVICEEM,

sgt Baas.
sine STRAT
aso Fuean
ea paetbsue
sees 3185

nD

wa

I declare under penalty-of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregaing fs-true and correct.

Ex

suted.on February 24, 2010, at Oakland, California.

PROOF OF SERVICE

93022 O77 MHERNANDS

EZ O271SKA