arrow left
arrow right
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

GEORGE D. YARON, ESQ. (State Bar #96246) KEITH E. PATTERSON, ESQ. (State Bar #225753) MICHAEL J. PENG, ESQ. Sy Bar #260852) ELECTRONICALL YARON & ASSOCIATES FILED 601 California Street, 21% Floor Superior Court of California, San Francisco, California 94108 County of San Francisc Telephone: (415) 658-2929 FEB 26 2010 Facsimile: (415) 658-2930 Clerk of the Court BY: CHRISTLE ARRIO! Attorneys for Defendant Deputy Glerk 84 LUMBER COMPANY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO JOYCE JUELCH and NORMAN JUELCH, SR. CASE NO. CGC-09-275212 ) Plaintiffs, ) DECLARATION OF MICHAEL J. ) PENG IN SUPPORT OF 84 LUMBER ) COMPANY’S MOTION FOR ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR, IN THE ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP) As) ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY Vv. ‘Reflected on Exhibits B, B-1, C; and DOES 1-) ADJUDICATION OF ISSUES ‘8500; and SEE ATTACHED LIST, ) ) Hearing Date: March 18, 2010 ) Hearing Time: 9:30 am, Defendants. ) Depart. No.: 220 ) Hearing Judge: Hon. Harold E. ) Kahn ) ) Date Action Filed: | May 20, 2009 ) Date Set For Trial: — April 5, 2010 T, Michael J. Peng declare as follows: 1. 1am an attorney, duly licensed to practice law before all courts of the State of California, and an associate of the law firm Yaron & Associates, attorneys of record for Defendant 84 Lumber Company (“84 Lumber”). 2. The following facts are known to me, and if called as a witness, I could and would competently testify thereto. 3. Attached as Exhibit “A” is a true and correct copy of the Complaint, identifying 84 Lumber, dated May 20, 2009. 4. Attached as Exhibit “B” is a true and correct copy of 84 Lumber’s Special eclaration of Michael J. Peng -l- GAIZ65\MSNDec].Peng.wpdBR wiLy sO Interrogatories, Sct One, which were served on Joyce Juelch on August 24, 2009. 5. Attached as Exhibit “C” is a true and correct copy of 84 Lumber’s Request for Production of Documents, Set One, which were served on Joyce Juelch on August 24, 2009. 6. Attached as Exhibit “D” is a true and correct copy of Joyce Juelch’s Verified Responses to 84 Lumber’s Special Interrogatories, Set One, which were served on 84 Lumber on September 29, 2009. 7. Attached as Exhibit “E” is a true and correct copy of Joyce Juelch’s Verified Responses to 84 Lumber’s Request for Production of Documents, Set One, which were served on 84 Lumber on September 29, 2009. 8. Attached as Exhibit “F” is a true and correct copy of the relevant portions of Joyce Juelch’s deposition testimony, taken on November 20, 2009. 9. Attached as Exhibit “G” is a true and correct copy of the relevant portions of John Chambers’ deposition testimony, taken on January 12, 2010. 10. Attached as Exhibit “H” is a true and correct copy of the Affidavit of Frank Cicero, Vice-President of 84 Lumber Company, dated February 25, 2010. 11, Attached as Exhibit “T’ is a true and correct certified copy of the County of San Joaquin, Building Inspection Department, Application for Permit and Inspection Record, for 251 S. Adelbert, signed by John Chambers. This document is also attached as Exhibit “1" to 84 Lumber’s Request for Judicial Notice. 12. Attached as Exhibit “J” is a true and correct copy of Defendant Hamilton Materials, Inc.’s Verified Responses to Plaintiffs’ Standard Interrogatories to All Defendants, verified on June 8, 1998. This document was served in the Jn re: San Francisco County Complex Asbestos Litigation, Case No. 828684. This document is also attached as Exhibit “4" to 84 Lumber’s Request for Judicial Notice. 13. Attached as Exhibit “K” is a true and correct copy of Defendant Kaiser Gypsum Company’s 2007 Verified Supplemental Responses to Plaintiffs’ Standard Interrogatories to All Defendants, verified on August 8, 2007. This document was filed served in the In re: San Francisco County Complex Asbestos Litigation, Case No. 828684. This document is also attached jeclaration of Michael J. Peng, 2 G:\3265\MSJ\Decl.Peng.wpdas Exhibit “5" to 84 Lumber’s Request for Judicial Notice. 14. Attached as Exhibit “L” is a true and correct copy of a medical report written by Plaintiffs’ expert, Dr. R.M.Luros, dated October 2, 2009. Tdeclare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and this Declaration was executed on February 26, 2010, at San Francisco, California. MICHAEL J. PENG 3 GA3Z6S\MSJWDeel. Peng.wpd cclaration of Michael J. PengEXHIBIT Aou mH A UH RB WN = — —“ oO BRAYTONS PURCELL LLY ATIORNEYS AT LAW 222 RUSH LANDING ROAD POBOK 6169 NOVATO. CALIFORNIA 4946-6109 {515}898-1555 € € DAVID R. DONADIO, ESQ., S.B. #154436 ERIC C, SOLOMON, ESQ,, S.B. #119131 BRAYTON PURCELL LEP SUMMONS, ISBUED Attorneys at Law igen OOF sn biter Court 222 Rush Landing Road wa P.O, Box 6169 (CASE MANNGEMENT CONFERENCE SET MAY 2.0 2009 Novato, California 94948-6169 (415) 898-1555 Clerk a APR LB 2010 rg CORUNA Attomeys for Plaintiffs Bt epuly Claw DEPARTMENT 206 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO SISENSERER sn 3 gsnrsros 7 “7 ) ‘0. CGe-09-275212 Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT FOR PERSONAL INJURY- vs. AND LOSS OF CONSORTIUM - . - ASBESTOS ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B“*P) As Reflected on Exhibits B, B-1, C; gud DOES 1-8500; and SEE ATTACHED lL Plaintiff JOYCE JUELCH was born September 18, 1946. 2. The @Brayton%Purcell Master Complaint for Personal Injury [and Loss of Consortium]- Asbestos (hereinafter "Master Complaint") was filed January 2, 2003, in San Francisco Superior Court. A copy of the Master Complaint and General Order No. 55 may be obtained upon request from Brayton**Purcell, and designated portions of the Master Complaint are incorporated by reference herein pursuant to the authority conferred by General Order No. 55, Plaintiffs’ claims are as set forth in said Master Complaint against defendants herein as follows: Wi M MANDATORY ELECTRONIC FILING Wt PURSJANT TO AMENDED G0, 158 <* SORBED MI INT FOR PERSONA! AND 7Aean awe we nN BRAYTON®PURCELL LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 222 RUSH LANDING ROAD ~~" PQ, Box 6169 NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6100 (HS) 3981555 ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST BUCYRUS INTERNATIONAL, INC. BECHTEL CORPORATION (DE) SEQUOIA VENTURES INC. THOMAS DEE ENGINEERING CO,, INC. GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC. METALCLAD INSULATION CORPORATION PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION PLANT INSULATION COMPANY QUINTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION VIACOM, INC, WESTERN MacARTHUR COMPANY MacARTHUR COMPANY WESTERN ASBESTOS COMPANY PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY , GENUINE PARTS COMPANY (GPC) 84: LUMBER COMPANY, A LIMITED PARTNERSIHIP CHEVRON U.S.A. INC, CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY 3M COMPANY, UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION HAMILTON MATERIALS, INC. CSK AUTO, INC, TIMEC COMPANY, INC. RED\WOOD PLUMBING CO., INC. CONSOLIDATED INSULATION, INC. DOUGLASS INSULATION COMPANY, INC. OSCAR E. ERICKSON, INC, SANTA FE BRAUN, INC. AS SUCCESSOR-IN- INTEREST TO C.F, BRAUN, INC, J.T, THORPE & SON, INC. UNOCAL CORPORATION SIJELL OIL COMPANY TOSCO REFINING COMPANY, INC. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY DILLINGHAM CONSTRUCTION, N.A., INC, and DOES 1-8500, Defendants. Joyce Juetch and Noi ieleh, St te fendants (Bet San Francisco Superior CourtCause of Action First (Negligence) Second (Strict Liability) Third (False Representation) Fourth (Loss of Consortium) kr Xm Oo Oo Oo Bw WwW oo 0 & Prech (Premises Owner/ i m Contractor Liability) Sixth, Seventh, Eighth QO Inseaworthiness, Negligence Jones Act],Maintenance and Cure) Ninth (Longshore and Harbor Workers O Compensation Act [LHWCA]) Tenth, Eleventh (F.E.L.A.) Oo Twelfth, Thirteenth (Respiratory Safety Devices) Fourteenth, Fifteenth e Shoe Grinding} Sixteenth (Concert of Action) Seventeenth, Eighteenth (Fraud, Deceit/Negligent Misrepresentation/Concealment} Nineteenth (Fraud/Deceit/ Intentional Misrepresentation) Twentieth (Fraud/Deceit - Kent) Twenty-First (Aiding/Abetting Battery - Met Life) Oo Oo *and their alternate entities as set forth in the Master Complaint or on any Exhibit. O OOr OOF o OoCo amend an ere wn 10 €C C 3, Plaintiff's asbestos-related injury, date of diagnosis, employment status, and history of exposure to asbestos are as stated on Exhibit A. 4, Plaintiffs were married on February 14, 1981. 5. (a) "Exposed persons" in paragraphs 21, 68 and 69 of the Master Complaint include plaintiff JOYCE JUELCH herein and plaintiff's husband, NORMAN JUELCH, SR., and plaintiff's first husband, John Chambers. 6. Plaintiffs’ claims against defendant VIACOM, INC. (successor by merger to CBS CORPORATION which is suceessor-in-interest to WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION) exclude military and federal government jobsites. pated: Sisley BRAYTON‘PURCELL LLP By: David R. Donadio Attomeys for PlaintiffsEXHIBIT AOo end AW ew NY Ss € EXHIBITA € Plaintiff's exposure to asbestos and asbestos-containing products occurred at various locations both inside and outside the State of California, including but not limited to: Employer Dameron Hospital Stockton, CA Naval Supply Depot Stockton, Peay San Joa French Camp, C. Plant Insulation Company Plant Insulation Company Plant Insulation Company 1300 - 64" St. Emeryville, CA 94662 Northern California Insulation aka Metalclad Insulation Corporation Northern California Insulation aka Metalclad Insulation Corporation Northern California Insulation aka Metalclad Insulation Corporation Unknown Northem California Insulation aka Metalclad Insulation Corporation NPS Energy Services ue in General Hospital Location of Ex posure Dameron Hospital Stockton, CA Naval Supply Depot Stockton, eX San Joaquin General lospital French Camp, CA 4" Floor Tosco Oil, Avon, CA Dow Chemical Pittsburg, CA Shell Oit Martinez, CA Shell Oil Martinez, CA Sutter Memorial Hospital Sacramento, CA. Campbell Sou Sacramento, CA Slaughterhouse Sacramento, CA Cheese Factory South Sacramento, CA Rancho Seco Nuclear Powerhouse, Herald, CA Job Title Nurse Janitor Nurse Insulator {Apprentice} Insulator (Apprentice) Insulator (Apprentice) Insulator Insulator (Apprentice) Insulator Insulator Insulator Insulator ~A Exposure Dates 1964-1974 1966 1975-1976 1982-1984 {2 months) 1982-1983 (3 weeks) 1983-1984 (1 month) 1983-1984 (2 months) 1984 {1 -2 weeks) 1984 (1 month) 1984 (3 weeks) 1984 {3-4 weeks) 1984-1992 EXHIBIT ACw ew nd A WY ke WN a eee o R= Oo vy yon WwW RN Re = Fe ce Se BRRRRRBERESBE SEWAGE XH cont'd. Location of Exposure Employer Exposure Job Title Dates Northern Califomia Lassen College Insulator 1985 Insulation aka Metalclad Waste Incinerator (6 months) Insulation Corporation Susanville, CA Norther California Com Products Insulator 1985 Insulation aka Metalclad Stockton, CA (2-3 months) Insulation Corporation Northern California Modules Alaska Insulator 1985 Insulation aka Metalclad Stockton, CA (Apprentice) (4-5 months) Insulation Corporation PARA: TIO SURE: Plaintiff resided with her first husband John Chambers. Plaintiff's husband performed brake and engine repairs on fleet trucks and regularly returned home with asbestos-containing debris on his clothing, Plaintiff recalls shaking out and washing his work clothes in the garage. Plaintiff currently contends she was exposed to asbestos as a result of her husband’s employment. Plaintiff's husband’s work history is as follows: Location of * Exposure Employer Exposure Job Title Dates ‘Dinuba Distributing Dinuba Distributing Mechanic 1971-1977 Stockton, CA Stockton, CA Plaintiff has resided with her husband Norman Juelch Sr., local 16 insulator since 1981. Plaintiff recalls she was exposed to asbestos-containing materials by washing her husband’s laundry after work. Plaintiff recalls her husband frequently returned home with asbestos- containing debris and dust on his clothes from the jobsite, Plaintiff shook out her husband’s dusty clothes before washing them in the garage. Plaintiff recalls vacuuming her husbands’ car which he drove to and from work on a daily basis, Plaintiff's husband’s work history is as follows: Location of Exposure Employer Exposure Job Title Dates Plant Insulation Company Various commercial and Insulator 1981-1983, industrial buildings 1985 Including: Owens Coming World Various locations Insulator 1981-1985 Headquarters including: {6-7 months) 1 Owens Coming Pkwy Sierra Pacific Power Co. Toledo, OH 43659 Valmy Power Station Valmy, NV tit EXHIBIT A KNtsheeo 1046 6 n PE! A . -~~ wean Aw FW ON 10 Employer Pioneer Insulation Contractor Inc 2085 Boxwood Wa’ Fremont, CA 9453} Plant Insulation Company Plant Insulation Company Plant Insulation Company Plant Insulation Company Plant Insulation Company Plant Insulation Company 1300 - 64" St. Emeryville, CA 94662 Fruin-Colnon Crop. 1299 Clayton Road W. Ballwin, MO Fruin-Colnon Crop. 1299 Clayton Road W. Ballwin, MO Plant Insulation Company Metatclad Insulation Corporation 2198 § Dupont Dr P.O. Box 61024 Anaheim, CA 92803 Metalclad Insulation Corp. 2198 S, Dupont Drive P.O, Box 61024 Anaheim, CA 92803 at C EXHIBIT A {cont'd.) Location of . x Job Title Unknown Insulator PG&E, Unit 1 Insulator Pittsburg, CA Tosco Oil, Insulator Avon, CA Union Of! Insulator Oleum/Rodeo, CA Hl Dupont de Nemours & Insulator 0. Antioch, CA Dow Chemical Insulator Pittsburg, CA Shell Oit Insulator Martinez, CA Procter & Gamble, Insulator Sacramento, CA Louisiana Pacific Insulator ulp mill amoa, CA Roman Meal Bread Factory Insulator South San Francisco, CA Campbell Soup Sacramento, CA Pacific Bell Stockton, CA Insulator Insulator -TIUM - ASBES' Exposure Dates 1981 (1 week) 1982 (3 weeks) 1982-1984 (2 months) 1982-1983 1982-1985 1982-1985 1983-1984 (1 month) 1982 (1 month) 1983 (6 weeks) 1983 {approx, 1 week) 1983-1985 1983-1985 (3 weeks) EXHIBIT ACw eo NAW e YN aaron = s 17 Employer Metalclad Insulation Corp. 2198 South Dupont Drive P.O. Box 6102 Anaheim, CA Metalclad Insulation Corp. 2198 S. Dupont Drive P.O, Box 61024 Anaheim, CA 92803 Metalclad Insulation Corp. EXHIBIT A {cont'd.) Location of Exposure Lassen College Waste Incinerator Susanville, CA Shell Oil Martinez, CA Com Products 2198 S. Dupont Drive Stockton, CA P.O. Box 61024 Anaheim, CA 92803 Plant Insulation Company Hormel Meat Packing Stockton, CA Plant Insulation Company —- Sequoia Hospital Rewhwood City, CA Metalclad Insulation Corp, Modules - Alaska 2198 S. Dupont Drive Stockton, CA P.O. Box 61024 Anaheim, CA 92803 N.P.S. Energy Services Inc.; Rancho Seco Nuclear Dravo Constructors Inc. Powerhouse 11 Stanwix St. ~ Herald, CA Pittsburg, PA NON-OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE: C Job Title Insulator Insulator Insulator Insulator Insulator Insulator Insulator Exposure Dates 1983-1984 (6 months) 1984-1985 (2 months) 1984-1985 (3-4 months) 1984 (2 weeks) 1984 1985 (4-5 months) 1986-1988 Plaintiff recalls assisting her first husband John Chambers, building a house in Stockton, California in the early 1970s. Plaintiffrecalls mixing, applying ai sanding asbestos containing KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC. joint and taping compounds purchased from 84 LUMBER. Plaintiff recalls assisting her second husband Norman Juelch, Sr., remove and replace brakes on aused 1977 FORD F-2 NAPA AUTO PARTS, Kalispell, Montana. Wt i it (0, in the early 1980s, Plaintiff recalls purchasing the brake pads at EXHIBIT Aowe N Aw & WN 10 Cc C EXHIBIT A (cont’d.) Plaintiff's exposure to asbestos and asbestos-containing products caused severe and permanent injury to the plaintiff, including, but not limited to breathing difficulties, asbestosis, lung and/or other cancer, mesothelioma, and/or other Jung damage. Plaintiff was diagnosed with lung cancer on or about January 2009. Plaintiff retired from her last place of employment as a result of becoming disabled due to an injury not related to asbestos. She has therefore suffered no disability from her asbestos- related disease as "disability" is defined in California Code of Civil Procedure § 340.2. EXHIBIT A 1086 IPLAINT FOR PERSONAI UR R -EXHIBIT BEFENDANTS ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST BUCYRUS INTERNATIONAL, INC. BECHTEL CORPORATION (DE) SEQUOIA VENTURES INC. THOMAS DEE ENGINEERING CO., INC, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC. METALCLAD INSULATION CORPORATION PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION PLANT INSULATION COMPANY QUINTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION VIACOM, INC. ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST BUCYRUS INTERNATIONAL, INC. GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION EXHIBIT B WESTERN MacARTHUR COMPANY MacARTHUR COMPANY WESTERN ASBESTOS COMPANY PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY GENUINE PARTS COMPANY (GPC) 84 LUMBER COMPANY, A LIMITED PARTNERSUIP CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY 3M COMPANY UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION HAMILTON MATERIALS, INC, SK AUTO, INC. DOES 1-800 ALTERNATE ENTITY BUDA ENGINE CO, BUCYRUS-ERIE. MARION POWER SHOVEL COMPANY, THE OSGOOD COMPANY GENERAL EXCAVATOR COMPANY GARLOCK, INC. COLTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. FAIRBANKS-MORSE, FAIRBANKS MORSE ENGINES. BELMONT PACKING & RUBBER CO. GARLOCK PACKING CO. U.S. GASKET CO. GOODRICH CORPORATION ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC. MATTERN X-RAY HOTPOINT ELECTRIC APPLIANCE COMPANY LIMITED TRUMBULL ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY GE INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS CURTIS TURBINES PARSONS TURBINES GENERAL ELECTRIC JET ENGINES SACOMA-SIERRA, INC. SACOMA MANUFACTURING COMPANY E.LS, AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION CONDREN CORPORATION, THE PARKER SEAL COMPANY DENISON HYDRAULICS INC. GREER HYDRAULICS CORPORATION EXHIBIT B Hwe ws aun kr YW NY 27 SEQUOIA VENTURES, INC. VIACOM, INC. WESTERN MacARTHUR COMPANY GENUINE PARTS COMPANY CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY 28) uv Kiron roacasy ey MPLAIN' ‘Al EXIIIBIT N (cont'd ALTERNATE ENTITY BECHTEL CORPORATION (DE) CBS CORPORATION WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION WESTINGIIOUSE ELECTRIC AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY BF, STURTEVANT KPIX TELEVISION STATION PARAMOUNT COMMUNICATIONS, INC GULF & WESTERN INDUSTRIES, INC, NORTH & JUDD MANUFACTURING COMPANY WESTERN ASBESTOS CO. MAC ARTHUR COMPANY BAY CITIES ASBESTOS COMPANY #.K. PINNEY, INC, NAPA AUTO PARTS GENUINE PARTS COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, INC, RAYLOC BRAKES AUTHORIZED MOTOR PARTS CORP, GENUINE PARTS COMPANY OF WISCONSIN, INC. AUTOMOTIVE PARTS COMPANY COLYEAR MOTOR SALES COMPANY GENERAL AUTOMOTIVE PARTS CORPORATION STANDARD UNIT PARTS CORPORATION BIGERUD AUTO PARTS FANCHER AUTO-TRUCK PARTS CO. CHEVRON U.S.A. PRODUCTS COMPANY CHEVRON CORPORATION PRODUCTS COMPANY CHEVRON CORPORATION CHEVRON OIL REFINERY CHEVRON CHEMICAL COMPANY WILSHIRE OIL, STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN OPERATIONS, INC. GULF OIL COMPANY GULF OIL OF CALIFORNIA GULF OIL CORPORATION GULF OIL PRODUCTS COMPANY CITEVRON RESEARCH AND ‘TECHNOLOGY PACIFIC OIL REFINING PACIFIC REFINING CO. SEQUOIA REFINING CORP. CHEVRON U.S.A., INC. CHEVRON U.S.A. PRODUCTS, INC. EXHIBIT BOo ww aun & WwW HK EXINIBIT B (cont'd) ALTERNATE ENTITY 3M COMPANY MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY IRVINGTON UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION UNION CARBIDE CHEMICALS AND PLASTICS COMPANY, INC, UNION CARBIDE AND CARBON PRODUCTS LINDE AIR PRODUCTS COMPANY CSK AUTO, INC. KRAGEN AUTO SUPPLY CO. NORTHERN AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION | CHECKER AUTO PARTS, INC, TBDPC CORPORATION PACCAR AUTOMOTIVE, INC, GRAND AUTO, INC, AL'S AND GRAND AUTO SUPPLY, INC. SCHUCK’'S AUTO SUPPLY TOPPS AUTOMOTIVE TRAK AUTO PARTS EXHIBIT B ciabatta eed 13 MPLAINT FOR PERSONA! mM ~ AEXHIBIT B-1own an B® Wn EXHIBIT B.A DEFENDANTS ‘TIMEC COMPANY, INC. REDWOOD PLUMBING CO., INC. CONSOLIDATED INSULATION, INC, DOUGLASS INSULATION COMPANY, INC, OSCAR E. ERICKSON, INC. SANTA FE BRAUN, INC. AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO C.F, BRAUN, INC. THOMAS DEB ENGINEERING CO., INC. J.T. THORPE & SON, INC, DOES 1-800; DOES 1001-2000 ALTERNATE ENTITY OSCAR E. ERICKSON, INC. ASSOCIATED INSULATION OF CALIFORNIA. OSCAR E. ERICKSON COMPANY OSCAR ERICKSON, INCORPORATED J.T, THORPE & SON, INC. THE THORPE COMPANY THORPE PRODUCTS CO. AT. THORPE NORTHWEST ok SORAEY 3 15 EXHIBIT B-1EXHIBIT C1 EXHIBIT. 2 || DEFENDANTS 3) PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY OSCAR E. ERICKSON, INC. UNOCAL CORPORATION BECHTEL CORPORATION (DE) 4 || SHELL OIL COMPANY SEQUOIA VENTURES INC, TOSCO REFINING COMPANY, INC. METALCLAD INSULATION CORPORATION 5 || PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY THOMAS DEE ENGINEERING CO,, INC. DILLINGHAM CONSTRUCTION, N.A., INC, J.T, THORPE & SON, INC. 6 || TIMEC COMPANY, INC, PLANT INSULATION COMPANY REDWOOD PLUMBING CO., INC, WESTERN MacARTHUR COMPANY 7 || CONSOLIDATED INSULATION, INC, MacARTHUR COMPANY DOUGLASS INSULATION COMPANY, INC. WESTERN ASBESTOS COMPANY 8 || SANTA FE BRAUN, INC, AS SUCCESSOR-IN- DOES 1001-2000 9 INTEREST TO C.F. BRAUN, INC, 10 ALTERNATE ENTITY. 11 || DILLINGHAM CONSTRUCTION DILLINGHAM CONSTRUCTION N.A,, INC. INTERNATIONAL, INC. 12 DILLINGHAM CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION 13 DILLINGHAM CONSTRUCTION, INC. DILLINGHAM HEAVY CONSTRUCTION 14 GORDON II. BALL INC. BASALT ROCK 15 BASALT ROCK CO,, INC. BASALT SHIPYARD 16 BASALT PRECAST DIVISION DILLINGHAM CONSTRUCTION 17 PACIFIC LTD, DILLINGHAM CONSTRUCTION GUAM, LTD, 18 HD&C-INTERIORS, LTD. HAWAIIAN BITUMULS & PAVING COMPANY 19 HAWAIIAN CONCRETE & ROCK COMPANY HAWAIIAN DREDGING & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 20 WATKINS ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS, INC. INLAND INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTORS, 21 INCORPORATED . NORMAN PETERSON 22 ALBINA ENGINE & MACHINE WORKS ALASKA STEAMSIIIP COMPANY 23 BEACON GASOLINE COMPANY BEACON PETROLEUM COMPANY 24 FOSS TUG & LAUNCH! SIMPSON CONSTRUCTION 25 WILLAMETTE IRON & STEEL COMPANY 26 PETERSON-SIMPSON DIVISION 271 28 |) a EXHIBIT C K Yopenstotctr PLAINT FOR x TORY Al rp =ATOSCO REFINING COMPANY, INC, EXHIBIT-€ (contd.) LTERNATE ENTITY TOSCO CORPORATION THE OIL SUALE CORPORATION DIABLO SERVICES CORPORATION LION OJL COMPANY PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY PACIFIC TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH PREMISES OWNER PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY UNOCAL CORPORATION SHELL OIL COMPANY TOSCO REFINING COMPANY, INC. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY CONTRACTOR, DEFENDANTS DILLINGHAM CONSTRUCTION, NA, INC. BELL TELEPHONE LOCATION PG&E, Pittsburg, CA Union Oil, Rodeo/Oleum, CA Tosco Corp., Avon, CA. Dow Chemical, Pittsburg, CA; EI Dupont De Nemours & Co., Antioch, CA Campbell Soup Company, Sacramento, CA Union Oil, Rodeo/Oleum, CA Shell Oi} Tosco Oit, Avon, CA Pacific Bell, Stockton, CA LOCATION Tosco Corp. (1976-2000) Avon, CA Pittsburg Power Plant (PG&E) Pittsburg, CA Dow Chemical Pittsburg, CA. E.f. Dupont DeNemours & Co, Antioch, CA. 18 TIME PERIOD 1982 1982-1983 1982-1984 1982-1985 1983-1985 1982-1983 1983-1984; 1984-1985 1982-1984 1983-1985 TIME PERIOD. 1982-1984 1982 1982-1985 1982-1985 EXHIBIT COo ON AW ew NH = Bas 13 CONTRACTOR DEFENDANTS. DILLINGHAM CONSTRUCTION, N.A., INC. (cont’d.) REDWOOD PLUMBING CO., INC, CONSOLIDATED INSULATION, INC. DOUGLASS INSULATION COMPANY, INC. a [AL INJURY Al EXUIBIT C (cont'd) LOCATION TIME PERIOD Rancho Seco Nuclear 1984-1992, Powerhouse Herald, CA Procter & Gamble 1982 Sacramento, CA. Union Oil (1896-1983} 1982-1983 Rodeo/Oleum, CA Shell Oil 1983-1984; Martinez, CA 1984-1985 Sequoia Hospital, Redwood City, 1984 CA ‘Union Oil (1896-1983) 1982-1983 Rodeo/Oteum, CA. Shell OFF 1983-1984; Martinez, CA 1984-1985 Campbell Soup Company 1983-1985 Sacramento, CA Sequoia Hospital 1984 Redwood City, CA ‘Louisiana 1983 PacificfHammond ‘Georgia Pacifie/Stockton PacificfEvergreen Samoa, CA Dow Chemical 1982-1985 Piusburg, CA E.1. Dupont DeNemours & Co. 1982-1985 Antioch, CA Union Oil (1896-1983) 1982-1983 Rodeo/Oleum, CA Sequoia Hospital 1984 Redwood City, CA Shell Oil 1983-1984; Martinez, CA 1984-1985 EXHIBIT C 19ww nd Aw WwW N aeoepes CONTRACTOR DEFENDANTS. DOUGLASS INSULATION COMPANY, INC. (cont'd.) OSCAR E, ERICKSON, INC, SANTA FE BRAUN, INC, AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO C.F. BRAUN, INC. “ KNigdereantotoar, i T SURY Al EXHIBIT C (cont'd) LOCATION Tosco Corp. (1976-2000) Avon, CA Dameron Hospital Sacramento, CA Hormel Meat Packing Stockton, CA, Campbell Soup Company Sacramento, CA Shell Oi} Martinez, CA ’ Tosco Corp. (1976-2000) Avon, CA Pirtsburg Power Plant (PG&E) Pittsburg, CA Louisiana Pacific/Jammond ‘Georgia Pacific/Stockton Pacific/Evergreen Samoa, CA E.}. Dupont DeNemours & Co. Antioch, CA Sequoia Hospital Redwood City, CA Campbell Soup Company Sacramento, CA Dow Chemical Pittsburg, CA Union Oil (1896-1983) Rodeo/Oleum, CA. Shell Oil Martinez, CA Pittsburg Power Plant (PG&E) Pittsburg, CA 20 TIME PERIOD 1982-1984 1964-1974 1984 1983-1985 1983-1984; 1984-1985 1982.1984 1982 1983 1982-1985 1984 1983-1985 1982-1985 1982-1983 1983-1984; 1984-1985 1982 EXHIBIT Cwo ON A BR WN 25 CONTRACTOR DEFENDANTS SANTA FE BRAUN, INC. AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO C.F, BRAUN, INC. (cont’d.) BECHTEL CORPORATION {DEYSEQUOIA VENTURES INC. 26 | METALCLAD INSULATION 27 CORPORATION 28] if iN i R NAL EXHIBIT C (cont'd) LOCATION Dow Chemical Pittsburg, CA, E.I. Dupont DeNemours & Co. Antioch, CA. Corn Products Stockton, CA Union Oil (1896-1983) Rodeo/Oleum, CA Tosco Corp. (1976-2000) Avon, CA Dow Chemical Pitisburg, CA E.L Dupont DeNemours & Co. Antioch, CA. Pittsburg Power Plant (PG&E) Pittsburg, CA Sequoia Hospital Redwood City, CA Sierra Pacific Power Company Valmy Power station Valmy, NV Rancho Seco Nuclear Powerhouse Nerald, CA Shell Oi) Martinez, CA. Union Oil (1896-1983) Radeo/Oleum, CA Tosco Corp. (1976-2000) Avon, CA Procter & Gamble Sacramento, CA 21 “A TIME PERIOD 1982-1985 1982-1985 1984-1985 1982-1983 1982-1984 1982-1985 1982-1985 1982 1984 1981-1985 1984-1992 1983-1984; 1984-1985 1982-1983 | 1982-1984 1982 EXHIBIT Cyp wm NY AW BF wWN 10 CONTRACTOR DEFENDANTS. METALCLAD INSULATION CORPORATION (cont'd) “a a Anfured JOR EXHIBIT C (cont'd) LOCATION EI, Dupont DeNemours & Co. Antioch, CA Campbell Soup Company Sacramento, CA Shell Oil Martinez, CA Union Oil (1896-1983) Rodeo/Oleum, CA Pacific Bell Stockton, CA Sierra Pacific Power Company Valmy Power station Valmy, NV Rancho Seco Nuclear Powerhouse Herald, CA Lassen College Susanville, CA. Dow Chemical Pittsburg, CA Com Products Stockton, CA Hormel Meat Packing Stockton, CA Modules Alaska Stockton, CA Cheese Factory Sacramento, CA Sutter Memorial Hospital Sacramento, CA Tosco Corp. (1976-2000) Avon, CA 22 TIME PERIOD 1982-1985 1983-1985 1983-1984; 1984-1985 1982-1983 1983-1985 1981-1985 1984-1992 1983-1985 1982-1985 1984-1985 1984 1985 1984 1984 1982-1984 EXHIBIT Cwo ed Aw WN CONTRACTOR DEFENDANTS. TIMEC COMPANY, INC. THOMAS DEE ENGINEERING CO,, INC, 4.7, THORPE & SON, INC. PLANT INSULATION COMPANY WESTERN MacARTHUR COMPANY /MacARTHUR COMPANY/WESTERN ASBESTOS COMPANY F ERSONAI EXHIBIT C (cont'd) LOCATION Union Oil, Radeo.Oleum, CA Tosco Oil, Avon, CA Dow Chemical, Pittsburg, CA Shell Oil, Martinez, CA. Various Various Various Various 23 0 RTIOM - TIME PERIOD 1982-1983 1982-1985 1982-1985 1983-1984; 1984-1985 Various Various Various Various EXHIBIT CEXHIBIT Bcmt DH B® WN 10 i 12 13 14 15 16 7 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FORGE D. YARON, ESQ, (State Bar #96246) ITH E, PATTERSON, ESQ. (State Bar #225753) IMICHAEL J. PENG, ESQ. Ase Bar #260852) lYARON & ASSOCIATES 01 California Street, 21" Floor an Francisco, California 94108 ‘elephone: (415) 658-2929 Facsimile: (415) 658-2930 Attorneys for Defendant 84 LUMBER COMPANY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO OYCE JUELCH and ) CASE NO. 275212 IORMAN JUELCH, SR., DEFENDANT 84 LUMBER COMPANY’S SPECIAL Plaintiffs, INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE, TO ) PLAINTIFF JOYCE JUELCH v. ) ) [Code of Civit Procedure §§ 2030.210 - SBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP), 2030.310] Defendants. ) PROPOUNDING PARTY: Defendant 84 LUMBER COMPANY RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff JOYCE JUELCH SET NUMBER: ONE Defendant 84 LUMBER COMPANY (“84 LUMBER”) requests that Plaintiff JOYCE ‘LCH (“Plaintiff’) answer under oath, within thirty (30) days, in accordance California Code of ivil Procedure §§ 2030.210-2030,310, the following interrogatories. You are hereby notified that at the commencement of trial of this case, 84 LUMBER will ask he Court for an order precluding you from introducing evidence related to the subject matter of these interrogatories which has not been disclosed by the answers to these interrogatories. it Special Interrogatories -1- Seria aCOW A eh Bw NY NN BN NON Nw Boe ee ka som BRRREBBRBRERSERARREBEAS DEFINITIONS 1 The terms “YOU” and “YOUR” include Plaintiff JOYCE JUELCH, anyone acting n her behalf, her agents, her employees, her companies, their agents, their employees, their ttomeys, their accountants, their investigators, and anyone else acting on their behalf, as defined in Judicial Council Form interrogatories. 2. The term “84 LUMBER” refers to Defendant 84 LUMBER COMPANY and/or its arent or subsidiary companies, successors, related entities, divisions, partners and joint venturers. 3. The term “DATE(s)” means to state the day, month, and year. 4. The term "PERSON" includes natural persons, a firm, association, organization, artnership, business, trust, corporation or public entity. 5. The term “IDENTIFY,” when used with respect to PERSON(s), shall mean a btatement of the PERSON’s full name, title, residential and business addresses, and telephone faumber(s). 6. The term “IDENTIFY,” when used in reference to a location, means to state the name, street address, city, state, and zip code for each location. 7. The term “DOCUMENT” means a writing, as defined in Section 250 of the KCalifornia Rules of Evidence, and includes, but is not limited to the originals, copies, hand written, rinted, typed, photostat, photograph or otherwise recorded materials, however produced or eproduced, of every kind and description in whatever form (e.g. final and draft versions), in your ossession, custody, care or control, including, but not limited to, all writings, correspondence, letters, notes, memoranda, reports, studies, charts, photographs, videotapes, accounting records, journals, calendars, appointment books, diaries, drawings, sound recordings, computer documents, omputer diskettes, computer files, and other data compilations from which information can be btained or translated. The term “DOCUMENT” also refers to originals and copies of all the above pon which notations in writing, printed or otherwise, which do not appear on the originals. 8. The term “IDENTIFY,” when used in reference to “DOCUMENT(s),” means to escribe specifically the DOCUMENT(s), including a description of its type (e.g. letter memorandum, telegram, chart, etc.), and to state its date, author, addressee, title, file identification pecial Interrogatories -2-umber or symbol, and to identify the present location and the name and last known address of the resent custodian of such DOCUMENT(s). If any such DOCUMENT(s) are no longer in YOUR ossession or subject to YOUR control, state what disposition was made and the time and date of uch disposition, identifying the PERSON having knowledge of its content. 9, The term “IDENTIFY,” when used in reference to a product, means to describe the roduct by the name under which it is sold in the market place (trade name) its generic name, or any Jang or nickname used in YOUR occupation. 10. The terms “SELL” and “SOLD” shall mean to exchange or deliver for money or its uivalent. SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES NTERROGATORY NO. 1: Please state all facts in support of YOUR contention that YOU were exposed to asbestos (through products and/or materials SOLD by 84 LUMBER. INTERROGATORY NO. 2: Please provide each DATE upon which YOU contend that YOU were exposed to asbestos hrough products and/or materials SOLD by 84 LUMBER. NTERROGATORY NO. 3: Please describe all products and/or materials (by brand name, manufacturer, product type or bby a physical description) SOLD by 84 LUMBER that YOU contend were the source(s) of each of [YOUR alleged exposures to asbestos. INTERROGATORY NO. 4: For each product identified in YOUR Response to Interrogatory number 3, please state the IDATE(s) and location(s) where YOU were exposed to each product. NTERROGATORY NO. 5: For each product identified in YOUR Response to Interrogatory number 3, please describe © activity or activities that YOU contend that YOU were exposed to asbestos from mat that YOU ontend were SOLD by 84 LUMBER. Hf 3.Cc OY DAA BW Ne YM YY YY NR RY eB ew Be se eB Be ee eS IAW Bw HY & SB we IA Aa BDH = Ss INTERROGATORY NO. 6: Please IDENTIFY cach PERSON who has knowledge of any facts in support of YOUR ontention that YOU were exposed to asbesios through products and/or materials SOLD by 84 LUMBER. INTERROGATORY NO. 7: Please IDENTIFY any and all DOCUMENTS in support of YOUR contention that YOU ere exposed to asbestos through products and/or materials DISTRIBUTED, SUPPLIED, and/or OLD by 84 LUMBER. ATED: August 24, 2009 YARON & ASSOCIATES » hAQE GEORGE D. YARON KEITH E. PATTERSON MICHAEL J. PENG Attorneys for Defendant 84 LUMBER COMPANY ee Interrogatories -4-PROOF OF SERVICE Lam over 18 years of age and not a party to the within action. | am employed in the County of San Francisco; my business address is Yaron & Associates, 601 California Street, 21st Floor, San Francisco, California 94108-2826. On August 24, 2009, at or about, 3:15 p.m., I served the within: DEFENDANT 84 LUMBER COMPANY’S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE TO PLAINTIFF JOYCE JUELCH addressed to; David Donadio BRAYTON PURCELL 222 Rush Landing Road P.O, Box 6169 Novato, CA 94948 Tel. (415) 898-1555 Fax (415) 898-1247 (Attorneys for Plaintiff's) With Notice to All Defense Counsel via U.S. Mail - See Attached Service List VIA E-MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION. Based on a court order or an agreement of the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, 1 caused the documents to be sent to the persons at the e-mail addresses listed above, 1 did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. VIA U.S. MAIL: am “readily famitiar” with the firms practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. 1 am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. ideclare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on August 24, 2009, at San Francisco, California. /s/ Marisela H. Navarro MARISELA H. NAVARRO MNAVARRO@YARONLAW.COMPage i of 2 LexisNexis File & Serve Transaction Receipt Transaction ID: 26748429 Submitted by: Marisela Navarro, Yaron & Associates Authorized by: Michael 3 Peng, Yaron & Associates Authorize and file on; Aug 24 2009 3:26PM PDT en AR err rn eeteeneeenrnenin rer Court: CA Superior Court County of San Francisco Division/Courtroom: N/A Case Class: Civil Case Type: Personal Injury-Asbestos Case Number: 275212 Case Name: Juelch vs Asbestos Defendants (Brayton) crete ttt A ne erent hear ereeneen===prreerenenne~rrr Transaction Option: Serve Only - Private Billing Reference: 3265 Read Status for e-service: Not Purchased a eeerrneeneeraeemnae mint tte ete erent ener nnerenennyereeiet Documents List 4 Document(s) Attached Document, 9 Pages Document ID; 23854544 PDF Format | Original Format Document Type: Access: Statutory Fee: Linked: Discovery - use for electronic service only Public $0.00 Document title: FORM INTERROGATORIES-GENERAL Attached Document, 8 Pages Document ID: 23854620 PDF Format | Original Format Document Type: Access: Statutory Fee: Linked: Discovery - use for electronic service only Public $0.00 Document title: DEFENDANT 84 LUMBER COMPANY'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE, TO PLAINTIFF JOYCE JUELCH Attached Document, 7 Pages Pocument ID: 23854636 PDF Format | Original Format Document Type: Access: Statutory Fee: Linked: Discovery - use for electronic service only Public $0.00 Document title: DEFENDANT 84 LUMBER COMPANY'S REQUEST FOR ADMISSION, SET ONE, TO PLAINTIFF JOYCE 3UELCH Attached Document, 5 Pages Document ID: 23854674 PDF Format | Original Format Document Type: Access: Statutory Fee: Linked: Discovery - use for electronic service only Public $0.00 Document title: DEFENDANT 84 LUMBER COMPANY'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE, TO PLAINTIFF JOYCE JUELCH Expand All [2] Sending Parties (2) Party Party Type . Attorney Firm Attorney Type 84 Lumber Co LP Defendant Yaron, George D Yaron & Associates Attorney in Charge El Recipients (4) cd Service List_(1) Delivery Option Party Party Type Attorney Firm Attorney Type Method Service Juelch, Joyce Plaintiff Counsel, Asbestos Bp Brayton Purcell LLP-Novato Attorney in Charge E-Service 1 additional Recipients (0) (2) Case Parties httns'//w3 fileandserve lexisnexis com/WebServer/WebPages/FileAndServe/nreReviewSnhmit asn?’dnWh 8/94/9009Page 2 of 2 About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Customer Support - 1-888-529-7587 @ LexisNexis® | Copyrignt © 2009 texisNexis®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. hitne-/An3 fileandserve lexisnexis enm/WehServer/WebhPaves/FileAndServe/nrcReviewSubmit asn?daWh | 8/24/2009EXHIBIT CA PF w NHN = oe IN A 10 M 12 B 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EORGE D, YARON, ESQ, (State Bar #96246) ITH E, PATTERSON, ESQ. (State Bar #225753) ICHAEL J. PENG, Ea {Sas Bar #260852) ARON & ASSOCIATES 01 California Street, 21" Floor an Francisco, California 94108 elephone: {3 658-2929 ARAL Bite facsimile: (415) 658-2930 ttorneys for Defendant 4 LUMBER COMPANY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO JOYCE JUELCH and ) CASE NO. 275212 JORMAN JUELCH, SR., ) DEFENDANT 84 LUMBER COMPANY’S REQUEST FOR Plaintiffs, PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, ) SET ONE, TO PLAINTIFF JOYCE v. ) JUELCH ) ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP), [Code of Civil Procedure §§ 2031.010 - 2031.060] Defendants. } ) PROPOUNDING PARTY: Defendant 84 LUMBER COMPANY RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff JOYCE JUELCH SET NUMBER: ONE Defendant 84 LUMBER COMPANY (“84 LUMBER”) requests that Plaintiff JOYCE ELCH (“Plaintiff”) answer under oath, within thirty (30) days, in accordance with California Code Request for Production of Documents f Civil Procedure §§ 2031.210-2031.320, the following requests. You are hereby notified that at the commencement of trial of this case, 84 LUMBER will ask he Court for an order precluding you from introducing evidence related to the subject matter of these quest for production which has not been disclosed by the answers to these requests.1s 2 DEFINITIONS 3 1, The terms “YOU” and “YOUR?” inchide Plaintiff JOYCE JUELCH, anyone acting 4 ln her behalf, her agents, her employees, her companies, their agents, their employees, their 5 jattomeys, their accountants, their investigators, and anyone else acting on their behalf, as defined 6 |in Judicial Council Form interrogatories. 7 2, The term “84 LUMBER” refers to Defendant 84 LUMBER COMPANY and/or its 8 parent or subsidiary companies, successors, related entities, divisions, partners and joint venturers. 9 3. The term “DATE” means to state the day, month, and year. 10 4, The term "PERSON" includes natural persons, a firm, association, organization, 11 |partnership, business, trust, corporation or public entity. 12 3, The term “IDENTIFY,” when used with respect to PERSON(s), shall mean a 13 {statement of the PERSON’s full name, title, residential and business addresses, and telephone 14 fnumbers). 15 6. The term “IDENTIFY,” when used in reference to a location, means to state the name, 16 street address, city, state, and zip code for cach location. 17 7. The term “DOCUMENT” means a writing, as defined in Section 250 of the 18 {California Rules of Evidence, and includes, but is not limited to the originals, copies, band written, 19 jprinted, typed, photostat, photograph or otherwise recorded materials, however produced or 20 freproduced, of every kind and description in whatever form (e.g. final and drafi versions), in your 21 |possession, custody, care or control, including, but not limited to, all writings, correspondence, 22 jetters, notes, memoranda, reports, studies, charts, photographs, videotapes, accounting records, 23 jjournals, calendars, appointment books, diaries, drawings, sound recordings, computer documents, 24 computer diskettes, computer files, and other data compilations from which information can be 25 jbtained or translated. The term “DOCUMENT” also refers to originals and copies of all the above 26 |upon which notations in writing, printed or otherwise, which do not appear on the originals. 27 8. The term “IDENTIFY,” when used in reference to “DOCUMENT(s),” means to 28 |describe specifically the DOCUMENT(s), including a description of its type (e.g., letter equest for Production of Documents -2-oO wm NY AA BW KH YE NY N NY NY NY NY NN De w]e ee ea i i ony AW & BW NY KF SOD wm I AH RB YW YD SE SD emorandum, telegram, chart, etc.), and to state its date, author, addressee, title, file identification umber or symbol, and to identify the present Jocation and the name and last known address of the resent custodian of such DOCUMENT(s). If any such DOCUMENT(s) are no longer in YOUR ossession or subject to YOUR control, state what disposition was made and the time and date of disposition, identifying the PERSON having knowledge of its content. 9. The term “IDENTIFY,” when used in reference to a product, means to describe the oduct by the name under which it is sold in the market place (trade name) its generic name, or any lang or nickname used in YOUR occupation. 10. The term “RELATING TO” when used with respect to documents shall mean any and 1 documents which in any way or in any manner refer to, relate to, concern, contain, embody, or lescribe the subject matter referred to in this Request for Production of Documents. 11. The terms “SUPPLY” and “SUPPLIED” shall mean to provide, furnish, or make available for use. 12, The terms “DISTRIBUTE,” “DISTRIBUTED,” and “DISTRIBUTION” shall mean to provide or the provision of, supply or supply of, deliver or the delivery of, goods and/or products. 13. The terms “SELL” and “SOLD” shall mean to exchange or deliver for money or its quivalent, 14. The terms “ADVERTISE” and “ADVERTISED” shall mean to engage ina form of mmunication whose purpose is to inform potential customers about products and services and how © obtain and use them. 13. The terms “MANUFACTURE” and “MANUFACTURED” shall mean the organized tion of making goods and services for sale. 16. The terms “MODIFY” and “MODIFIED” shall mean to change, cause to change, ake different, or cause a transformation to. 17. The terms “LABEL” and “LABELED” shall mean to mark or assign a brief escription for purposes of identification. 18. The terms “ASSEMBLE” and “ASSEMBLED” shall mean to piece, set up, or to put logether the parts of. equest for Production of Documents -3-we mnt DA BW HY we NM YY WY NNN ND BD ew re ee ee Oe PF It DA F&F WM |— SO wD HN Aw BB WHY SE S 19, The terms “MARKET” and “MARKETED” shal! mean to engage in the commercial romotion, sale, or distribution of products and services. 20. The terms “REBRAND” and “REBRANDED” shall mean the process by which a roduct or service developed with one brand or company or product line affiliation is marketed or istributed with a different identity. 21, The terms “TEST” and “TESTED” shall mean to examine in order to determine the ality, properties, or certain characteristic of a product and/or material. 22, The terms “DESIGN” and “DESIGNED” shall mean the act of working out the form f something; deliberate ordering of components, 23. The terms “INSPECT” and “INSPECTED” shall mean to audit, examine carefully, 1 a formal evaluation applied to certain characteristics in regard to a product and/or material. 24. The terms “REPAIR” and “REPAIRED” shall mean the act of putting something in orking order again. WRITINGS AND OTHER TANGIBLE THINGS REQUESTED REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 1: All DOCUMENTS supporting YOUR contention that 84 LUMBER expressly represented to YOU that asbestos and asbestos-containing products were of merchantable quality, and safe for e use for which they were intended. QUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 2: All DOCUMENTS supporting YOUR contention that 84 LUMBER expressly represented YOUR ex-husband, John Chambers, that asbestos and asbestos-containing products were of erchantable quality, and safe for the use for which they were intended. IREQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 3: All DOCUMENTS supporting YOUR contention that 84 LUMBER expressly represented to members of the general public that asbestos and asbestos-containing products were of Imerchantable quality, and safe for the use for which they were intended. IREQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 4: All DOCUMENTS supporting YOUR contention that YOU made purchases from any 84 equest for Production of Documents -4-UMBER retail location, including, but not limited to, sales receipts. UEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 5: All DOCUMENTS RELATING TO the amount or extent of asbestos exposure that YOU ontend YOU experienced while working with products and/or materials YOU contend that YOU urchased from any 84 LUMBER location. UEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 6: All DOCUMENTS RELATING TO the duration (minutes, hours, days, etc.) of exposure to sbestos YOU contend YOU experienced while working with products and/or materials YOU ontend that YOU purchased from any 84 LUMBER location. QUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 7: All DOCUMENTS RELATING TO any and all safety precautions which YOU took with Oo Oo MD mw EF WwW = ° —_ oo Do gard to YOUR work with any asbestos-containing products YOU allegedly purchased from any _ we 4 LUMBER location, including, but not limited to, the use of respiratory protection or any other & afety equipment or practice. UEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 8: All DOCUMENTS supporting YOUR contention that 84 LUMBER DISTRIBUTED Se oe oe a Aw sbestos-containing products, to which YOU were exposed. EST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 9: All DOCUMENTS supporting YOUR contention that 84 LUMBER SOLD asbestos- — oo Noe ao 2 ontaining products, to which YOU were exposed. UEST FOR PRODUCTION NO, 10: All DOCUMENTS supporting YOUR contention that 84 LUMBER SUPPLIED asbestos- Noo nb = N we pontaining products, to which YOU were exposed. IREQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 11: All DOCUMENTS supporting YOUR contention that 84 LUMBER ADVERTISED bo & Von aniwn lasbestos-containing products, to which YOU were exposed. IREQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 12: All DOCUMENTS supporting YOUR contention that 84 LUMBER MANUFACTURED Nw x N 0 ‘equest for Production of Documents -5-sbestos-containing products, to which YOU were exposed. UEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 13: All DOCUMENTS supporting YOUR contention that 84 LUMBER MODIFIED asbestos- taining products, to which YOU were exposed. IREQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 14: All DOCUMENTS supporting YOUR contention that 84 LUMBER LABELED asbestos- containing products, to which YOU were exposed. IREQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 15: All DOCUMENTS supporting YOUR contention that 84 LUMBER ASSEMBLED asbestos- oOo RW A A BR WN ° containing products, to which YOU were exposed. IREQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 16: Ali DOCUMENTS supporting YOUR contention that 84 LUMBER MARKETED asbestos- Se oe oe Pee ee products, to which YOU were exposed. QUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 17: All DOCUMENTS supporting YOUR contention that 84 LUMBER REBRANDED asbestos- — ee Aw Icontaining products, to which YOU were exposed. EST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 18: All DOCUMENTS supporting YOUR contention that 84 LUMBER TESTED asbestos- ~ me Oo 0 containing products, to which YOU were exposed. UEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 19: All DOCUMENTS supporting YOUR contention that 84 LUMBER DESIGNED asbestos- y Co Now bp ontaining products, to which YOU were exposed. N a QUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 20: AILDOCUMENTS supporting YOUR contention that 84 LUMBER INSPECTED asbestos- bh no ontaining products, to which YOU were exposed. EST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 21: we aa All DOCUMENTS supporting YOUR contention that 84 LUMBER REPAIRED asbestos- wy oe ontaining products, to which YOU were exposed. equest for Production of Documents -6-wc oN DH BRB WD w NM WYN NNR NN KY Be SB BP eB Re ew me oe oe 2 2 A wA BY NHN SF SOD ww IAA B® BW KH SF SD QUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 22: All DOCUMENTS IDENTIFIED in YOUR Responses to 84 LUMBER’S Special terrogatories, Set One, served concurrently herewith. ATED: August 24, 2009 By: Request for Production of Documents YARON & ASSOCIATES 7 LD *t GEORGE D. YARON KEITH E. PATTERSON MICHAEL J. PENG Attorneys for Defendant 84 LUMBER COMPANYPROOF OF SERVICE Tam over 18 years of age and not a party to the within action. I am employed in the County of San Francisco; my business address is Yaron & Associates, 601 California Street, 21st Floor, San Francisco, California 94108-2826. On August 24, 2009, at or about, 3:15 p.m., J served the within: DEFENDANT 84 LUMBER COMPANY’S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE TO PLAINTIFF JOYCE JUELCH addressed to: David Donadio BRAYTON #PURCELL 222 Rush Landing Road P.O. Box 6169 Novato, CA 94948 Tel. (415) 898-1555 Fax (415) 898-1247 (Attorneys for Plaintiff's) With Notice to All Defense Counsel via U.S. Mail - See Attached Service List VIA E-MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION. Based ona court order o