arrow left
arrow right
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JOYCE JUELCH, ET AL VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, anc address)! Alan R. Bri {State Bar # 8.B. #73685) Brayton <> uireel 222 Rush Landing Road Novato, CA 94948 ‘TELEPHONE NO: (415) 898-1555 Fax no. (Optoneh: (415) 898-1247 E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional: ATToRney For (vamet Plaintiff, JOYCE JUELCH SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF San Francisco street aponess: 400 McAllister Street CIV-110 1 FOR COURT USE ONLY ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: JOYCE JUBLCH, et al. DEFENDANTRESPONDENT: ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP) MAILING ADDRESS: MAR 30 2010 civ ano ze cove: San Francisco 94102 Clerk of the Court _BRANGH NAME: BY: LUCIA RAMOS Deputy Clerk _ REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL XJ Personal injury, Property Damage, or Wrongful Death [<1 Motor Vehicle Other (""] Family Law (] Eminent Domain XK] Other (specify): Asbestos CASE NUMBER: CGC-09-275212 - A conformed copy will not be returned by the clerk unless a method of retum is provided with the dopument, ~ 1. TO THE CLERK: Please dismiss this action as follows: a. (1) ((_] With prejudice (2) (X] Without prejudice b. (1) CX | Complaint @) Petition (3) [__] Cross-compiaint filed by (name): on (date): (4) [7] Cross-compiaint filed by (name}: on (date): () (] Entire action of ali parties and all causes of action @Dd) 2. (Complete in ali cases except family law cases.) [2] Court fees and costs were waived for a party in this case. (This information may be obtained from the checked, the declaration on the back of this form must be completed). Date: March 10, 2010 £ Other (specify)" As to defendant KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC. only, with a mutugl waiver of costs. wo If this box is for Alan R.Brayton A srayt CTYPE OR PRINT NAME OF avrorney [__] PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY} (SIGNATURE) i gismoiscal requested is of specified parties only of specified causes of action Attorney or party without attorney for: CRU of aRGn or cess compas i be istraces” “SEM MPRENSS (ST piaintittiPetitioner —- [__]_Defendanl/Respotident Cross~Complainant 3. TO THE CLERK: Consent io the above dismissal is hereby given.** Date: > (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF | artorwey PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY) (SIGNATURE) Attomey or party without attorney for: (7) PlaintifPetitioner ("] Defenda: [~~] Cross-Complainant “if a cross-campiaint ~ or Response (Family Law) seeking affirmative relief ~ is on file, the attamey for cross- ani (respondent) must eh this consent if required by Code of Civi Procedure section 581 () ‘Respondent {To be campleted by clerk} 4, Dismissal entered as requested on {date}: 5 Dismissal entered on (dafe}: as te only (name): 6. [-_] Dismissal not entered as requested for the following reasons (specify): 7 a Attorney or party without attorney notified on (date): b. [7] Attorney or party without attorney not notified. Filing party failed to provide . a copy to be conformed means te return conformed copy Date: Clerk, by : Deputy Page 4 of 2 rocwdure, § SB% Forge Couctat Calorie REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL ov. Code § aR sa CIV120 Rev, July 1, 2006} inlo.c&s Faviediaie®\ hestnenctad Califawt lov Fertinéedd Pourentd KivmaneCiV-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: JOYCE JUELCH, et al. CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP) CGC-09-475212 Declaration Concerning Waived Court Fees The court has a statutory lien for waived fees and costs on any recovery of $10,000 or more in value by settlement, compromise, arbitration award, mediation settlement, or other recovery. The court's fien must be paid before the court will dismiss the case. 1. The court waived fees and costs in this action for (name): 2. The person in item 1 (check one): a. is not recovering anything of value by this action. b. is recovering less than $10,000 in value by this action. c. [1 is recovering $10,000 or more in value by this action. (if item 2c is checked, item 3 must be completed.) 3. All court fees and costs that were waived in this action have been paid to the court (check one): Ye¢ No I declare under penaity of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information above is true and correct. Date: (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF | ATTORNEY [] PARTY MAKING DECLARATION) {SIGNATURE} CIV=110 (Rev. duly 4, 2008) Page 2 of 2 en REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL LexisNexis® Automated Californih Judicial Council Forms lBIS & SMITH LP ARORNEYS ATLA Joyce Jueich v. Asbestos Defendants, et al. San Francisco County Superior Court Case No. CGC-09-275212 PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Tam employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am and not a party to the within action. My business address is One Sansome Street, Francisco, California 94104, yer the age of 18 suite 1400, San On March 30, 2010, I electronically served (E-Service) via LexisNexis FiJe and Serve pursuant to General Order No, 158, the following document described as: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL- KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC. on all interested parties in this action by placing [X]a true copy [ ] the original in sealed envelopes addressed as follows: Attorneys for Plaintiff: BRAYTON PURCELL LLP 222 Rush Landing Road P.O. Box 6169 Novato, California 94948 Telephone: (415) 898-1555 Facsimile: (415) 898-1247 thereof enclosed The above document was transmitted by Lexis-Nexis E-Service and the transmission was reported as complete and without error. [X} (STATE) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State off the above is true and correct. Executed on March 30, 2010, at San Francisco, Californi 4 California that 4850-6172-5 185.3