arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

HAKE Law, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Roe wo ew oO 0 wm NI OD il William M. Hake, Esq. (State Bar No. 110956) Melissa Ippolito, Esq. (State Bar No. 239811) Kathryn L. Hoff, Esq. (State Bar No. 260420) HAKE LAW, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 655 Montgomery Street, Suite 1000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: 415-926-5800 Fax: 415-926-5801 bill@hakelaw.com. melissa@hakelaw.com lucy@hakelaw.com Attorneys for Defendant BELL PRODUCTS, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ROBERT ROSS AND JEAN ROSS, Plaintiffs, PROOF OF SERVICE vs. Hearing Date: May 9, 2013 C.C. MOORE & CO., ENGINEERS, et al., Time: 9:30 a.m. Judge: Hon. Teri Jackson Defendants. Dept.: 503 Complaint: December 17, 2010 Trial Date: le Case No.: CGC-10-27573 1 ELECTRONICAULY FILE Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco MAY 03 2013 Clerk of the Court BY: CAROL BALISTRERI Deputy Clerk June 10, 2013HAKE Law, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION UA & Bw NK PROOF OF SERVICE I, Meagan Gordon, declare as follows: 1 am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. My business address is Hake Law, A Professional Corporation, 655 Montgomery St., Ste. 1000, San Francisco, California, 94111. Tam over eighteen years old and not a party to this action. On the date set forth below, I served the following document(s) described as: e REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT BELL PRODUCTS, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT * DECLARATION OF KATHRYN L. HOFF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT BELL PRODUCTS, INC.’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT « [PROPOSED] ORDER ON EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS AND MOTION TO STRIKE THE DECLARATION OF DAVID A, SCHWARTZ, M.D. IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT BELL PRODUCTS INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ¢ DEFENDANT BELL PRODUCTS INC.’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFE’S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF DISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN OPPOSITION TO ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT & BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE: in the ordinary course of business, the foregoing documents were served to all parties and counsel registered with LexisNexis File & Serve, as designated on the Transaction Receipt available on the LexisNexis website. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed May 3, 2013, at San Francisco, California. Meadgin Gordon 2s PROOF OF SERVICE