arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 _e il Sapa” = 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 G00D/1067474/166908280. MICHAEL J. PIETRYKOWSKI (SBN: 118677) mpietrykowski@gordonrees.com KATHRYN J. LAFEVERS (SBN: 252003) ELECTRONICALLY klafevers@gordonress.com FILED GORDON & REES LLP Superior Court of Gao Embarcadero Center West County ot gan Franciooo 275 Battery Street, Twentieth Floor G San Francisco, CA 94111 AUG 28 2013 Telephone: (415) 986-5900 Clerk of the Court Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 BY: WILLIAM mere eputy Clerk Attorneys for Defendant THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, ) CASENO, CGC-10-275731 ) Plaintiffs, ) DECLARATION OF KATHRYN J. ) LAFEVERS IN SUPPORT OF v. ) DEFENDANT THE GOODYEAR TIRE ) & RUBBER COMPANY’S MOTION IN ALTA BUILDING MATERIAL COMPANY., }) LIMINE TO EXCLUDE REFERENCE etal., )} TO GOODYEAR CANADA, INC. ) {MIL #3] Defendants. ) ) Action Filed: December 17, 2010 ) Trial Date: September 9, 2013 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I, KATHRYN J. LAFEVERS, hereby declare as follows: 1. 1 am an attorney duly licensed to practice before the courts of the State of California. I am an attorney practicing with Gordon & Rees LLP, attomeys of record for defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (“Goodyear”). The facts stated herein are true of my own personal knowledge except those matters stated on information and belief, and, as to those matters, I believe them to be true. I make this declaration in support of Goodyear’s Motion In Limine To Exclude Reference To Goodyear Canada, Inc. [MIL # 3]. -1- DECLARATION OF KATHRYN J. LAFEVERS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT THE GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE REFERENCE TO GOODYEAR CANADA, INC.Gordon & Rees LLP Embarcadero Center West 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Dp oe TD KH 2. Attached hereto as “Exhibit A” is a copy of the Declaration of E.W. DeMarse filed on behalf of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company in the New York City Asbestos Litigation, Index No. 125336-00, James J. Weeden v. A.C. and S., Inc., et al. 3. Attached hereto as “Exhibit B” is a copy of the record of the 1973 sale of asbestos gasket/packing product line from Goodyear Canada, Inc. to Canadian Durabla, Ltd. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at San Francisco, California on August 28, 2013. -2- DECLARATION OF KATHRYN J. LAFEVERS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT THE GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE REFERENCE TO GOODYEAR CANADA, INC.EXHIBIT A ROBERT ROSS AND JEAN Ross Vv. C.C, MOORE & CO, ENGINEERS SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT CASE NUMBER CGC-10-275731SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY | InRe: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION This Docurnent Applies to: JAMES J. WEEDEN, Plaintiff, . AFEIDAVIT - against ~ Index No.: 125336-00 AC. and S., INC, (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) er al, including GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY end GOODYEAR CANADA, INC., Defendants STATE OF OHIO ) COUNTY OF SUMMIT > ss: Now comes E.W. DeMarse, and having been duly placed under oath and cautioned to tel) the truth, deposes and states the following: : : 1. fn 1952, I received a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Washington University in St. Louis., Beginning in 1952 and continuing until] retired iv 1991, I was continuousty employed by the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. From 1952 until approximately 1983, 1 was continuously employed by the Industria) Products department in Goodyear’s Plant 2.in Akron, Ohio, 2. From 1952 - 1959 1 served inthe Industria) Products department as a rubber compounder for & variety of products, including sheet gaskets products, From 1959-1966, headed the Process Development Group, with responsibilty for rubber formulation reccrds and the factory processing of all Alcon Industrial Products, including the gasketing products, From 1966 ~ 1977, Iwas Chief Engincer for of the department's Special Products Group that was responsible for development control of various products including sheet gasket products, In the course of my work in thatdepartment, I became personally familiar with the design and formulation of the sheet gaskets products, some of which contained compressed asbestos encapsulated within a rabber binder, 3. Compressed asbestos sheet gasket was produced by The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company for approximately 50 years with production terminati ng for economic reasons in 1969. This product consisted of a blend of asbestos fibers and # solvent solution of compounded rubber thoroughly mixed together so that the mubber ‘component covered and adhered to the asbestos fibers, This material was produced in sheet form on equipment known as calendars at temperatures between 280° F and 300° F. The hot temperature resulted in evaporation of the solvent and curing of the rubber component. The end product was a stiff, rubber-sorfaced sheet made in thicknesses that was never any greater than '/4," No loose asbestos fibers were present in the finished sheet, E,W, DeMasse Further, Affiant sayeth naught. Subscribed and sworn to before me under Oath this 220 day of 272g. 2002 My commission expires on /0-7-02EXHIBIT B ROBERT ROSS AND JEAN Ross V. C.C. MOORE & Co. ENGINEERS SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT CASE NUMBER CGC-10-275731ETHER! “rig COODYEAR TINE § RUCKER SOND or CARAD ” Eee area ‘@ Conpony Incorpora . . a eto having ite Nond Office in the Dorough Of Rtobicoke, Sn the Honicipnlsty of Hotropeliten Toronto, __ ihevatnatter colled “the, vandor"} . of the FIN5e PART: “M- gunorn _PANDIE LUNTED, 4 Comeany y tneerperated | . fanadey having dt Mood Office ~" the City of Belleville, in the County of . Hastings, Ontario, . : {herainofter calied “tho Yurchssor*} “of tho UECOND PART. THEREAS tha Vendor hee boon mancfeeturing Durabba ~ Asbestos Guckot material {"tha product") exclusively for the Purchazor over the past many yours using secret forsules pro~ 1 vida by the: ‘Purchioer ord now proponda to discantinua suuh :° panutsctures . . Nw MURAEAS tha Purobanyr vilL manufacture Uin product nertatter nad for such porposs doskroo to purchaco wh} the “ machinary an’ eyoipaont fe the pousonrion of Vendor weed by tt gy eno anufgstare of the prodent und to sovaequire tha baste | formulas ond know-how as hexeinaftor provides . oH SHEREFORE ‘pnTa nenEEaNY HIYRESETEUt h pubjast to the terms ant conditions hevolnafter ect forth + (a) The ‘Yentor agrocs to soli to the Porchnser and at Ube i - purchagex's exponao to, deliver and Instead at the Pucchasor Plont dp Dollevilie, Ontorie (rpurchanor's Plant") dp opayating coutition, sintlar be that no enieking is Vondurte Plant, sptastectory te tha Perokagar, a2) tho machinasy and aquipaent used by tho Vendor ia tho sau factare of the product at tha Vendor's Plant in ee city of pvebec, Province of Quebec, (“Vandor's Phant*) o# . dorcribul in Schedule .A* harctor Ald of which is here~ . : leafter roferred to es “the oquipaant’. , oun 00976 CYOSOANEAS . nls yaar noch” AGREENINT mods, in triplicate, this di gay of toomll 28 |“( —_e GY01-070535, edged by the Vendor? ” -2- , Upen delivery, $f any part or pioco of the equipmont ot. aubstantindy correspond to ite description in Bchodule *A*, thin the Vendor may clact either to poduce the perchase price by the volue ef sush part or pleco ‘of the equipment as indionted ‘In Schudole *A*, ; ox, the Vendor may replace the pert or piece of tho aquipnent which falls to corrospond with its dongription in Gehadule "A* with a part or pioce of equipment which _ Gods tubstantially correspond with its deseription 4x { Bchodalo "A*. * . . the Purchoser hercby agrees io purchase tho oquipnont from the Vondor nnd te pay for the sane {exclusiva of Qativery and installation charyos) the cum of f16s,769,00 ("She Purchase Prica") as follower = ¢ "$) 625,000.00 by cheque paynbla to the Vendor ot dtu Mead Office on the execution and Jalivary of thie : Agreenont; the receipt of vhich cheque Ls horeby acknow- (14) ' §60,000,00 ty ehogua payable to the Vondor at its Rend Officn within two weks after receipt of suvoice ‘ox weitton donpnd by the Vendor #ollowing upon Selivexy ot Purchaser's Plant of oguipment having an nggregate: voluo based on the valuos set out in Schagule "AT of nat less than $50,000,007 i * (44) $50,000.00 payable by cheque to tha Vendor at ite tend Office one week efter receipt of Savoice or wedtten demond of the Vendor following upon the delivery by tho Vendor of al} tha ‘ogadpment at the Pureecerts i Flank, . fh. DUR 00377(iv) the balance of purchase price, viz. + 443,769.99. by cheque payable to the Vendor at its lead ottice one wouk attor invoice or written | pdomand of the vendor folleving upon the achievement of consistant standard quality production (aimiles to that currently botng prodyced at Vondor'y Fleat) off both calendars at Purchacor's Mant under tho . suporvicion of Vondor's’raprosentative and to the . catisfoction of the Forchozer, bit in any event net Jeter than Doconbor "21, 2973. | , fe) “Te ds undorstood that tho aforesaid’ purchise priso does not include any applicable colec tok (whether roderal, Provinetal of otherwise) ox Itcsnce foes all of which shall be pats os required by tha Purchaser ‘ in Gadition Go the wold purchnas prica.. : 2. | Tha Vendor abol2 at purchaser's exponag dismmntie the oquipuant ek tho Vendor's Qeobes Plant and transport the cane &. the Porshaccr's Plant ond thore dngtell the aquiprent: in oparating conddtion. ‘tho Purchaser shill notify,Vandor in welting os soon as possible folloving the oxecvtion of thie agresnont, but dn any ovont no Intex than the 30th aay of: : Beptanber, 1972, of the data on which Puxchaser shall accept Gelivecy of the first instalment ef the squipaent and upon . xecoipt of such notices Vonidor shall Proceod, unintorrupted}y ao far os practical, vith the Alsmantiing, tromporting and Sheteiling of the oquipeont nt Porchaser's Plont, ALL such + Work thal be completed by the Vendor not later then the 3tat doy of Doconber, 1973, Purchaser chal prepare and provide 11 piping, viring and othr f4ellittes required ta Murstnsur’s Plant tor installing, connecting and operating the oquipnant. ; : DUK 00378 GY01-010538GY01-010537 wae a. tele te exen part and piace of the equipment shaly pass ¢e the -Purchotor upon dedivory of tha samo ot Purchaser's Plant end until ouch tine tha risk of lomm, dannge to any port or piece of equipmont shell be borne by the Vondor and Vondor eholL insure and Koop insured each part and ploce of the equip- mont until oveh time; in the evant of. Joss or damage to any part ° or picce of equipmont prior to delivery the Vendor's xresponai- bility to the Purchaser ohald bo Lnlted to reducing tho pure ehnce prise by the value of such part or pince au shown én ‘Cehedule *A*, the Vondur being relessed of the obligation.to deliver auch part os plnee or ot ite option the Vendor may reppir or replace such port or piece. ‘ 4. The Purchaser acknowledges having viewod the siachinery and cquipmant uscd by tho Vendor st ite quobes Plant in the mamifacture of the profuct prior to the cxcrution ani éelivary of thio Agceement and that tha camo comprise substantially tho articles Ganoribed in tchotule “A” to this agraonant. Purchaser hao nek axanined the ogvipmont with o view to determining itu chhdition tut recognizos that it de wold onan “se ds* busta, that £€ has been ond fe dn oparntiny sondition capable of annu- tecburing the product: and thot upon imetaliation at the Par~ chosor's Plunt 1n siuiles oparating condition it will bo sit for the wanvfacture of the product es jorein contemplated, 5. Subject to tho torus and conditions of this Agrocuant, the'Vandor grants and conveys’ all ite right, title and futerest (ehether a Jaw or cguity) in the equipmunt to the Purchaser - ond to the absolute wee ef tho Purchaser, ite successors ond eapigna, = : : DUR 00379. . " , 6. The Vondor covenants that fo) Te hap the right to soli the oquipnmanty (4) Purchaser shalt potceably and quictly possess the equipsentr and : to) the egajpnent tv-froe from 211 charges and oncuabrances, . ne the Vandor agroos! Ia) To provide ona of ite ceployeen satisfactory to the Purchaser to oversoe the removal of the oes pment ab, at the Vendor's Quchos Plant; G. Ay Blake or A. M. Darcie are antiatactory Ee tho Purchasers . : . th} Yo provide one OF ita cuployees satisfactory te the Purchaser #08 Suparyivor & to avarsae the Snotnllation . of the syed poe: pment at the } sorts Plant; A. W. Darxio io satisfactory to the paruheuer) * provided that the Purchaser enal2 raishurse the Vander for ite costs of providing Vendor's caployean aforesaid to ovarcee tho | ronoval ond AnstelJation ef tho equiymont, Voter's costs ara to include woyos ond -any cupplonantal venotite'viiel Vendor : customily provides ite employuas nnd the costs of rofwmrssmont , are to bo paid by the.Purchaser upon demand, hy eloque, in such auount af Suvosced to the Purchaser -by the Vendor boned on the 1+ qepte of ondary and wayap sot out in Schoiule “B* bereto, 3. + ALL work to de with the Aimmntiing, trencportotion ant Insta} lation ‘of tha oquizment shall ba tho Vondor‘s responsibility « bot at tho Purchaual's axpenso with ouch zorponelbility me ‘ cxponeas to include. Labour, Iaboor euporvision, and any muturinte . an aro require’, Zn the ovant the Vendor onploys indopandant controctoxs for all ox any part of the removal, transportation and’ Lnstalistion of the oguipsant, Purchaser shall psy the proper conte thereof, incivding all toxos, dncurance -ané. othor charges , of such independent contrsckar, forthwith upon roseipk by Yendor of invoices for tha sumo from the indepondent contractor, 4 , : oun ooxso GY01-010538% (a) The Venddr agroos te provide "know-how" (as horéin~ after defined) to the Turchtsor during ene single sparied of thnoe ‘sonths with such period to connonoe upon completion Gf tho fnataliation ‘in operating condltion of tho aquipnent at Purchaser's Plont. {bh} The Purchaser agrees to uccopt’ao Vendor's full. patformence of its obligation to provide "know-how" such programe to truin Purchaner's onployess as may be exstablishod by Vendor's Dupervioor who is . te be such responsible ond skilled Employes of tho. . Vendor as tho Vondor shall appoint and ad’ sho} bo approved by the Purchnsor. F, Cote is a rovod by tha Purenosse awn A084 A Mater: wt) Rs {s) Por tha parpores of this Agracment the tere senpe-how shat be doaned to {nolode ald Information in thd” . poxscusion of the Vendor including ony corived froa 2 the Goodyoar Tira & Rubber Company of Akron, Chic, . rolating £ the uanofoctara, final motheds of inspection, " \ | (and, packing of tha produst Sneluding without tindtiog tha gonorality of the foregoing information With respect “go the following matters, bat only to tho extent Le ix readily avaiiahler : ‘ 1. Yormulao for body and skin - cost stocks. 2. Proceso tpocitteations «dias opéexttonal . sequences. 3, Operating npocttteations = detail of operating - Baquences, a ‘ opestticns) contzals end tonto, oo + gus pont sesgetption and specifications, — . . |) eapacitios, 6, safaty sng {011 movlodge of dotodt bacardy a for both parronnel and operations, + GYO1-010539no do, {0} 3 . 1 RYAF-NANGSA that vpon complation of tho dismantling of tho oquipment ot “ its Quobse Plant an@ ceasing. to manufacture the products . 7, Bourca of supply of oli materials, , 4, Pinal-producte equipment snd nathods of test. 3. ALL changes, dmprovenents and additions in conneetian with any of the foragoing end oll i related sgtoriale and documents, with the Purchesor ‘Tho Vander covenonts ond agro: ‘The Vendor wil rotorn to the Purchaser thoas sceret formulae provided by the Purchaser relating to the manufacture of the pedduct Sncluding a1 com pounding sections mooter formulae, aid Bil factory formelée uatch carda; the Vandor‘may olso provide the Porchaser with reloted formulss not originally t ! | 1 peovided by tho Purchaser, bet chail not be obliged to de 50, . The Vendor will pot anywhero et any tine thoreatter either itse2f or in assodietion with any other pacson, , Eiger corporstion ongege in the manugscture, seloy or other afatribution of the product spactfigaliy ith tho sscunt and grade of ashostos fibor now weed ip the Ourabis product, ‘nor will it make use of or Uioclono or knowingly pormit other's to mnke use of or disclosa . any doteiis of the secret formmlne originslly provided” by the Purchaser relating to the manufacture of the product including specifically tha onount and grada of asbestos fiber vsed in such manufecture: provided that th forapodng covenant shall not be deemed to prevent the use by the Vendor of formulations of tha cotmint for manufactura of ofo in opaxntions oF procosnos mubstantially unconnected with the nonutecture DE asbaptos chist packing. pun ootezGYa1-010545 Vendor's foventory of raw materials and finished goods on “hand ‘ot the time Vendor discontinuas its manufacture (all . -o- “ . ‘ . VM. The Vendox shall cell and Purchaser shall boy allof of wideh 4s horehiafter called Inventory). Tho quantity of | anventory to ba sold vholl be as datarninéd’ by the Vander 1 and rhoii not include anything which the Vonder way ue Ln ' procoxaes substantdhlly unconndoted with the manufacture of the product unlocs avreed to otherviso with the Purghaisar. the porchuap prico for the Inventory shell be calcvlotad hy "tho Vender cubjogt to generally accepted sound neeounting + practices including Vendor's purchaxo coskn fox row materials ond Vendor's current peice levels to Purchasor for fintched i goods, the purchace price shall be pale abgect to’ Vendor ts : vsvel terms of sattlowent for Iika quonti ties ‘upon roselpt by Vorchaser’ of Vondor's {avolea, Upon receipt of cick fnvolca the Porchasbr shall have the right to hava the purchaso price as invoiced authentseatnd i” the vondor to tho purehasar’ et metiefaction, 42, Vendor chol2 not ba rosyonsdlde or Mable for any t Lion or duengo dua to Suy Aulays tn the: transportation and {ndtallotion of any or nll of the-aquipwent ardeing from eny . causes reasonably beyond the control of the Vendor. 13, Side Agrocnant of ante and porchave, the rights and ” ptaigations of the partieg and all intarpentations of this Agroaxcnt chal be governed in all Yespects: by tha Lows of Canada * cand of the Province of Oaterle, , + . an wrrumss wntexcor the Partice horoto, have executed thnee prosente, an of the Jay and yaar firet above writton. + | 4 “ “. ‘scurpunr AS : Agreanept of Sala dsted the « 9" day of al. 4 Nee gE we 2 2973, botwoen THE GOODYFAR (TIRE F RUUBER COMPANY OF CANADA, LIMITED, Vendor, “and CANADIAN DURAMLA LIMITED. Pyrchoser. . , 130 “ACKING MENT Aegct toe . Description. « Qan2 Tabin, wood 1464 x 30 x 34" high ' 52000: Trucks Galv, fron $2 x 30 x 30" 221 my From eee 822 . oe .? . 23 * wa wk, oe oo. BACHE Bive Sient . a i” Reducor Radicom Whealbrator 4,vailve 12 Rote: arong 02007 Micebrator 3eiveive 42 Rotary G2009-p1020 Coddector WhonILrntor DoT & velve 12 Rotery 252 _ Fan, 54° sturtevant with vent 255 -Motée 30 IP G00/440/60/2 He 258. Calender, Asbestos & x 9 x $0.52 + Pressure : Rell Drive ober + Safety fxako 29 Stoam & Aielinos to Calender . 2630s Miixor, Asbostow , . a71 Hixer, dough so 372 uixer, dough , sac Notor 15 HB, 580, 2750 NH . . 0a? Hotor 15 NP, 530V, 1750 RPM 287 Focking Rolling Hachino a8 ‘Reducar’ Speed + 969 Motor 30 Hi 473 Shoar, 72 in. #/H 1983 . ae. Rogusse & Eo ‘coupling : 576 Printer 877 Brivo Varinkle 380 - = Caleniter . 908 Hover 30 i * spebysso/iar0 aH veg Fon, Fone ceectevaat 47F) 36 in. 236 Rotor Hostinghouss 60 RP woe it . Grinder, Mownarnil? “+ 93 peter, Brook 25 1 SRX359156 ' eo M12 Bkndaay far. 2685 shordan, 942 040K oto Brook 30 Ur ENKIBI4606 . 44,965 ‘V8 20 MP Frama 2567 and . Hover Eniengo Model 19 oO, . L~ Conment 71 {Signa Med) 2 Cosont Hixer (small alxor? . 4 = toledo scale 3 = Hotors 3 im 1240/350/3/60, _ Ea Rolling Hachine Botor with lolroyd . 30 Hotor 3he 360/580 1750 THN. on 72" Franter w/incloding Lavallen Variable Drive . a Motor toe" 37segsso/1¥0n on 12 om, £208, Pan wha. Rotor 5nP 3/60/5506 aay - ROkRE 1Gi0P,3/60/550/1750 op at $5 boosh Mixer 92083 Toledo Bente 2 q2078 reledo Ecole 304 bind i o— gored Yoledo Scdic LODE Din? 408 Base o299 Soledo Gesle 300 Cap Pigaunt Weiyhing a30n4 Toledo ccalo 308 Cop Rubber Welghis 0395 Toludo Regle 3005 ang. 1508 om tond ruck = bor Tiros at okie : 2 Stepping Hi Nght nes at hehieue 7 © Stock Tablas ~ $53.09 oooh 3 = Frocks, GalvsZron $2" a 20° x 30° $38.00, on. ° rook. ° 1 - 45 Gallon Toxine Service Tonk 2 1: 2 = 48 Gallon Soding (voter Glass) Tank DUR GO38¢ > GYO1-610542 333,09 $21.00 39,776.00 1,607.00 pS5.00 * 10,367.00 638.00 1,484,00 24795,09 2,798.00 752.00 o = 2c GYO1-010543 2 Dough Pone fer Asbestos Calender Pood = & = 300; 09) ja Tone for fubbar {Tub 386,00) | < 321 'Fon Chain dipeks at 660.00 each 4200 Ll 1/2 Ton Aix iodet 430, 1 ORAL EQUIPHIORT . Above schedule "A items for salo at prices Listed ond included in Tt shovld be potod-that itens say ba sddad or dotetad at - Contract. thich Ebso the ovorsll contract price’wiil be adjusted accordingly. tia Vondor declarce thats , ‘ fa) There d= np worxanty or condition thet any of the equipment de of ony spocdfied quality or fit for + . “Uany particular purpose, ot of a noxchantablo quality . Se than instaliselon ané operation es Geccribed 4 in the Aqrecrent. . tdtdalled for identification byt . CAMADIAR DURALLA LINIZED yatta . pe ey bur cos8sI: Vendor's costs for Yondor's personnel to supervise the renova) and ta) tb) fe iw GY01-010544 transfer of tho oquipmant from Qucbea Plant to Purcks plant, includes ‘ ut . SCUNDULE "RY to the ngragment af Sato dated the”? goy of ~ fy 1973, between THK GOODYRAR TIRE & WWHUEK LUMBANT UY CANADA, LaniTED, Vendor. enc CANADLAM DURADLA LIMITED, Purchoser, CANADIAN DURADLA LIMITED CONTRACT ADDENDUM ‘Inetadlotion of the equipment during‘and after Purchaser's | t Supervisor at 6102.30 por day. ‘ | Whore the Supervisor's hours of work exceed § hoves in + 4 day, ench ndditiqnes hour shalt be at a cost of snes! per hour, and . Whore Supervisor's hours of work ore upon Soturdsy, thon, the coat shall be §282.86 por day, and £2 the supervisor) hoors of work pon a Seturday oxcood 8 hours ino day, | each-adaitional hour shall be at a cost of $22.38 per | hour, und , | whare the Supdrvisox'» houra of work aro upon Guntey, ” _ thon Ge cost shall be $202.20 por day, ond tf tho - Superviser's hours of work npen a sunday axcced & hours 4a, 8 day, ach sdaitional hoor shull be ot a cont of 425,20 pox hour, and Sts , * where supervisor's hours of vork ure upon & Holiday oF “statutory Holidey, then the cost chal? bo $303.60 per. day ond 42 Suparvivor’s hours of work upon 8 Noliday ox ‘Statutory Holtday axceod | hoors in a day, then cach additonal howg shall ha at = cont of §37.95 por hoor, the Veléor'a onployoe’s oxpensas will be charged ot sctukl vatew in accordance with Vendor's stondard * praction. + Vendor's cost for Yondor's pereonnal to trodn Purchoser's onployous at Purchasor's plant, inclndar — Lo 4a)” . (ot ' Supervisor at $73.60 per dey Whore the Supervisor's hours of work excned # hours in, + a day, cagh additions? hour chall be at « cost of 1 i ! $42.90 por hour, and ! i OUR 00385avnt.nansas Nr a | & + fe) ° nhove supervisor's nours of work ore vpon saterdey, then the cost shall be $220.40 pex day, and S£ the s . “Sopexvixor's hours of work upon a Setoréay exceod @ hours Sn e day, each additional hour. shall bo at | fh cost of 413.80 por hoor, and tay Where the Supervisor's hours of ‘work sxe upon sunday, then the cot shell be §247.20 por day, and df the Supervisor's hours of work upon # Sunday oxeeod 8 hours in a Ony, eoch edditional hour shall be ot # cost of ” $18.40 per hour, ond + {el ‘Where the “guperviser's hours of vork are upon & Wo2sdey, + or Btotutory Hodieey, then the cost chol? be $220.80 per doy and Sf supervicor's hours of vork opon o Nolidey; er Statutory Holiday axcead & Hours in a Ony, then each © additional hour chall be at a cost of 627.60 por hovr, and ‘oy (th The Vendor's employee's expenses wii? be charged at actual fates in accordance with Vender’s ctondard practs _Tavolyas wil bo subst tted on w'mcnthiy bade for Vondor's costs ” tn providing tho, services ‘ot ito employues. we Inftielled for idontification by: ” . . . CANADIAN DUDANLA, LIMITED Loo 7el titnye” _G 2k Fe Podaxt Pleasant Chenical Plant Diode Te ase Noveaber 2, 1978 ‘ : x J Burkett/1100 . ee . . Vo hava eLixinated the use of asbestos and asbestos-bearing anteriale Sa {ids plert sxoept where vv here been wahle t find scceptahle wubeti tutes, te ee vy. Le 20, haxardl & "Be Be geibeta Dave ibe pot WSpasiae aps ct tapaeod of packing “Se Xn isolation besoscsry for an aren to cat geakets from chest wtock? re re at wee cae ak OE eto . dn Dendling material with « seal) percentage asbestos as the 1008 asbestos? I aspme that you are avere thet a plant Like this Le Joeded with insolation, Ve are constantly rencring and replacing Insulation to ‘pipeline and work ~ my costa increase stil? . I uitt eppreciate guidance you can give mo 20 that ve can ecnfora to the regulations at a intets conte . ” : . 0 Spar at . 7 ¥ Soom | O Kerager « Boginenring og oe GorP 008365 GY01-014384PROOF OF SERVICE ROBERT ROSS AND JEAN ROSS V. C.C. MoorE & Co. ENGINEERS SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT CASE NUMBER CGC-10-275731 Iam a resident of the State of California, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the within action. My business address is: Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000, San Francisco, CA 94111. On August 28, 2013 I served the within documents: DECLARATION OF KATHRYN J. LAFEVERS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE REFERENCE TO GOODYEAR CANADA, ENC, [MIL#3] by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax number(s) set forth below on this date before 5:00 p.m. by personally having Nationwide Legal, Inc. delivery the document(s) listed above to the person(s) at the address(es) set forth below. O od by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in United States mail in the State of California at San Francisco, addressed as set forth below. by electronically serving the document(s) described above via File & Serve Xpress on the recipients designated on the Transaction Receipt that is located on the File & Serve Xpress website and as set forth below: x BRAYTON PURCELL 222 Rush Landing Road Novato, CA 94948 Tele: 415-898-1555 Plaintiffs’ Counsel 1am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. Executed on August 28, 2013 at San Francisco, California. + f Sy » ta Sl) ie Vanessa Santellan Proof of Service