arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

SONJA E. BLOMQUIST, SBN #099341, sblomquist@lowball.com PAMELA Y. LOUIE, SBN #259391, plouie@iowball.com LOW, BALL & LYNCH ‘k ELECTRONICALLY 505 Montgomery Street, 7" Floor San Francisco, California 94111-2584 scope bold ED. Telephone (415) 981-6630 County of San Francisco Facsimile (415) 399-1506 AUG 30 2013 Clerk of the Court Attorneys for Defendant BY: ALISON AGBAY PACIFIC MECHANICAL CORPORATION BA ty Clare SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, } Case No. CGC-10-275731 d Plaintiffs, ) MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 3 ) v. }) PACIFIC MECHANICAL }) CORPORATION’S MOTION IN C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS; ) LIMINE TO EXCLUDE NON-PARTY Defendants as Reflected on Exhibit I ) WITNESSES FROM THE attached to the Summary Complaint herein; } COURTROOM EXCEPT FOR and DOES 1-8500, ) EXPERTS ) Defendants. } Judge: Hon. Teri L, Jackson ) Dept: 503 ) ) Trial Date: September 9, 2013 )} Complaint Filed: Decernber 17, 2010 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Defendant PACIFIC MECHANICAL CORPORATION (“PMC”) moves the court for an order in limine excluding all non-party witnesses from the courtroom except for expert witnesses] Authority for this motion is set forth in Evidence Code Section 777, which allows the court to exclude non-party witnesses from the courtroom at the time that other witnesses are under examination, so that such witnesses cannot hear the testimony of the other witnesses. Watson v. Department of Rehabilitation (1989) 212 Cal.App.3d 1271, However, with regard to expert witnesses, courts have held that it is appropriately within the discretion of the trial court to allow such experts to be present in order to hear testimony that -[- {Server igen-inst2 | £8SFTORAPMC MELs\MIL 3 - Exef Non Pany Witness. doca MOG may be pertinent to their own expert opinion. People v. Maxey (1980) 28 Cal.App.3d 190, 198- 199. Based on the foregoing, PMC respectfully requests that all non-party witnesses, other than expert witnesses, be excluded from the courtroom. Counsel will alert the court and opposing counsel as to the identity of any expert witness in the courtroom, and the reason for their presence before the expert hears any testimony or proceedings. Dated: August_?% , 2013 LOW, BALL & LYNCH Zi « py: [PR pe SONTH EBLOMOUST PAMELA Y. LOUIE Attorneys for Defendant PACIFIC MECHANICAL CORP. wD PMC’S MIL TO EXCLUDE NON-PARTY WITNESSES FROM COURTROOM EXCEPT FOR EXPERTS \\Serverd\gen-insiZ} 1 SSPI043\PMC MILs\MIL 3 - Exel Non Party Witness.doc