arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

LAW OFFICES OF COOLEY MANION JONES Hake Kurowsk1 LLP 0 Oo NDA HD BP YW NY bo oN NN BNR N ND De ee ee BRS BE Ge Fs S Be ARH BW KH SK Oo William M. Hake, Esq. (State Bar No. 110956) Joanna L. Drozd, Esq. (State Bar No.253707) Daniel B. Merrick, Esq. (State Bar No. 267276) ELECTRONICALLY COOLEY MANION JONES HAKE KUROWSKI LLP FILED 201 Spear Street, Suite 1800 Superior Court of California, San Francisco, CA 94105 County of San Francisco Tel: (415) 512-4381 FEB 02 2011 Fax: (415) 512-6791 Clerk of the Court BY: CHRISTLE ARRIOLA Attorneys for Defendant Deputy Clerk COLLINS ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ROBERT ROSS AND JEAN ROSS, Case No. CGC-10-275731 Plaintiffs, COLLINS ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC.’S NOTICE OF DEMURRER AND v. DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BeP), Defendants. Hearing Date: March 3, 2011 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept.: 220 Complaint: December 17, 2010 Trial Date: TBD TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on March 3, 2011, at 9:30 a.m., in Department 220 of the above-captioned Court, Defendant Collins Electrical Company, Inc. (“CEC”) will demur to Plaintiffs’ Complaint for Personal Injury — Asbestos, as filed December 17, 2010, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) section 430.10(e)-(f) and California Rules of Court, rule 3.1320. if Mit -l- (COLLINS ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC."S NOTICE OF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINTLAW OFFICES OF COOLEY MANION JONES HAKE KurowskI LLP po OY DH HW PF BN | RmowM MN MY ON NR NR De ee ee co ta fF A BF Yb YN =F SD BO we Mw AH HA RB WN KH SS CEC demurs on the following grounds: 1. Plaintiffs’ entire complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and is uncertain, ambiguous, or unintelligible. CCP § 430.10(e)-(f); Bockrath v. Aldrich Chem. Co. (1999) 21 Cal.4th 71. 2. Plaintiffs’ first cause of action for “Negligence” fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and is uncertain, ambiguous, and unintelligible. CCP § 430.10(e)-(); Bockrath v. Aldrich Chem. Co. (1999) 21 Cal.4th 71. 3. Plaintiffs’ second cause of action for “Strict Liability” fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and is uncertain, ambiguous, and unintelligible. CCP § 430.10(e)- (D; Bockrath v. Aldrich Chem. Co. (1999) 21 Cal.4th 71, 4, Plaintiffs’ third cause of action for “Loss of Consortium” fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and is uncertain, ambiguous, and unintelligible. CCP § 430.10(e)-(f). 5. Plaintiffs’ fourth cause of action for “Premises Owner/Contractor Liability” fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and is uncertain, ambiguous, and unintelligible. CCP § 430.10(e)-(f); Bockrath v. Aldrich Chem, Co. (1999) 21 Cal.4th 71. CEC bases its request on this notice and demurrer, the accompanying Memorandum of Points and Authorities, the accompanying Declaration of Daniel B. Merrick, the records and files of this case, any matter on which the Court takes judicial notice, and any evidence or arguments presented at the hearing. A proposed order has been provided. Respectfully Submitted, Dated: February 2, 2011 COOLEY MANION JONES HAKE KUROWSKI LLP By: DP. Monrrich. Daniel B. Merrick, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant COLLINS ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC. -~2- COLLINS ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC.’S NOTICE OF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT