arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

D7 eo MD WH RB WD me = 6 BRAYTON@PURCELL LLP ATTORNEYS ATLAW 222 RUSH LANDING ROAD POBOX 6169 NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6169 (415) 898-1555 eo oN YR YN NN Do CO sR Fw FF BN = SS OG SB SI A A BR WwW ALAN R, BRAYTON, ESQ,, S.B. #73685 DAVID R. DONADIO, ESQ,, S.B. #154436 OREN P. NOAH, ESQ., 8.B. #136310 ELECTRONICALLY BRAYTON*PURCELL LLP FILED Storey 2 Law Road Superior Court of California, PO. Box é ie Ing KO: County of San Francisco Novato, California 94948-6169 FEB 17 2011 (415) 898-1555 Clerk of the Court Tentative Ruling Contest Email: contestashestasTR@braytonlaw.com BY: VANESSA we ty Clerk jeputy Cler Attorneys for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, ASBESTOS No, CGC-10-275731 > Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY AND REQUEST vs. FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS; COLLINS ELECTRICAL COMPANY, Defendants as Reflected on Exhibit 1 INC.’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS” attached to the Summary Complaint } COMPLAINT herein; and DOES 1-8500. Date: March 3, 2011 Time: 9:30 a.m. Room: 220, Hon. Harold &. Kahn Trial Date: Not Set Action Filed: December 17, 2010 INTR Plaintiffs request that the Court take Defendant COLLINS ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC.’s Demurrer off calendar, without prejudice, and to grant plaintiffs at least 10 days’ leave to amend the Complaint herein to rectify and clarify the issue raised in said Demurrer. While plaintiffs believe that their Complaint has properly stated the ultimate facts, as required by the applicable law, plaintiffs are willing to amend their Complaint to specify that the claims against COLLINS ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC. arise from its employees’ disturbance of existing and newly applied asbestos-containing fireproofing and thermal K dered spent COLL: 1 PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY AND REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT COLLINS ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC."S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINTmm OO ODO OO YW DA w & WN Oo me WT A FW fF WN NM NM YN MY NN NN LY et A A BR WH Nm OS insulation during their installation, remodel and repair work in close proximity to plaintiff ROBERT ROSS, to wit (as stated in the Complaint): Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Vallejo, CA., 1959 (on and off for 3 months), 10/1973-12/1973, 3/1974-3/1976, 10/1976-2/1977 (1 month, on and off), 1977 (3 to 4 weeks, on and off); Veterans Administration Hospital, Palo Alto, CA., 1960 - 1962, 1965 - 1966, 1977 (approx. 2 months); San Francisco International Airport, San Francisco, CA., 8/1960-7/1961, 10/1961-6/1962, 5/1965-12/1966, 1/1967-3/1972, 1979 (2 weeks, on and off}; San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA., 8/1960-6/1962, 3/1965-12/1966, 1/1967-3/1972, 1983 (April) (2 weeks, on and off); Children’s Hospital, California Street, San Francisco, CA., 1960-1962, 1965-1966, 1967 - 1972, 1977 - 1981 (on and off); Firestone Tire & Rubber Salinas, CA., 8/1960-7/1961, 10/1961-6/1962, 5/1965- 12/1966 (3-4 weeks); IBM, Cottle Road, San Jose, CA., 1960 - 1962, 1965 - 1966, 1967-1972, 1977-1981; Lockheed, Sunnyvale, CA., 1960 - 1962, 1965 - 1966, 1967-1972, 1977-1981; University of California, Berkeley, CA., 8/1960-7/1961, 10/1961-6/1962, 5/1965-12/1966, 1/1967-3/1972, 4/1977-3/1981; UC Berkeley (Central Steam Plant), Berkeley, CA., 1960 - 1962, 1965 - 1966 (1 week), Standard Oil, Richmond, CA., 7/1961-10/1961, 7/1962-5/1965 G weeks, on and off), 10/1973-12/1973, 3/1974-3/1976, 10/1976-2/1977 (4 months, on and off), 1974 - 1977; University of California, Berkeley, CA. (Boiler Plant), 7/1961-10/1961, 7/1962-5/1965 (3 weeks); Sacramento Convention Center, Sacramento, CA., (16" St.), 4/1972- 9/1973 (3 months, on and off); Aerojet-General, Rancho Cordova, CA., 4/1972-9/1973 (18 working days); Bay View Housing Development (Hunters Point), San Francisco, CA., 1978 (2 weeks, on and off}; University of California, Berkeley, CA. (Warren Hall), 1979 (2 weeks); UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.,1980 - 1989,; 1990 - 1991, 1993, 1992-1993; University of California, Berkeley, CA. (Hearst Gym), 1981 (2 weeks, on and off); University of California, Berkeley, CA. (Gilman Hall), 1981 (1 week, on and off); University of California, Berkeley, CA, (Life Science Building), 1981 (1% weeks, on and off); Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Vailejo, CA. (Building 503); 1981 (6 weeks, on and off); St. Francis Hospital, San Francisco, CA., 1982 (2 weeks, on and off), 1984 (1 week, on and off); University of California (Dwight Derby School for the Deaf}, Berkeley, CA., 1983 (1 week, on and off); University of California Kiiniuredt93.4 ged eave COLELC. demurrer we - PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY AND REQUEST POR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT COLLINS: ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC.’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINTSo 26 Oe NH oT & WN (Harmon Gym), Berkeley, CA., 1983 (Oct.-Dec.) (3 weeks, on and off); University of California (Robbins Hall), Berkeley, CA., 1983 (Oct.-Dec.} (2 weeks, on and off); Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Building 71, Vallejo, CA., 1984 (2 months, on and off); and Mare Island Naval Shipyard (Building 70), Vallejo, CA., 1985 (2 weeks, on and off). I. LEGAL ARGUMENT A. PLAINTIFFS REQUEST LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT TO ADDRESS COLLINS ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC.’S ASSERTION THAT THE COMPLAINT FAILS TO APPRISE IT OF THE ASBESTOS- CONTAINING PRODUCT AT ISSUE HEREIN Plaintiffs do not believe that there are any serious deficiencies in the Complaint and that they have properly pled the “ultimate facts” that make up each of their causes of action against COLLINS ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC., pursuant to Careau & Co. v. Security Pac, Business Credit, Inc. (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 1371, 1390. Nonetheless, in order to expedite the prosecution of this matter and to save the parties and the Court the delay and expense of unnecessary litigation on the point, plaintiffs stand ready to amend the Complaint to address the issue raised by COLLINS ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC. Specifically, plaintiffs would file an amendment to the Complaint making clear that, with regard to COLLINS ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC., the claims arise from its employees’ disturbance of existing and newly applied asbestos-containing fireproofing and thermal insulation during their installation, remodel and repair work in close proximity to plaintiff ROBERT ROSS, to wit (as stated in the Complaint): Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Vallejo, CA., 1959 (on and off for 3 months), 10/1973-12/1973, 3/1974-3/1976, 10/1976-2/1977 (1 month, on and off), 1977 (3 to 4 weeks, on and off); Veterans Administration Hospital, Palo Alto, CA., 1966 - 1962, 1965 - 1966, 1977 (approx. 2 months); San Francisco International Airport, San Francisco, CA., 8/1960-7/1961, 10/1961-6/1962, 5/1965-12/1966, 1/1967-3/1972, 1979 (2 weeks, on and off); San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA., 8/1960-6/1962, $/1965-12/1966, 1/1967-3/1972, 1983 (April) (2 weeks, on and off); Children’s Hospital, Califormia Street, San Francisco, CA., 1960-1962, 1965-1966, 1967 - 1972, 1977 - 1981 (on ENslucedst9340ipidonp-roq jena t2L cou wad, . PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY AND REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMA IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT COLLINS ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS? C42 ON DA HW fF WN 10 and off); Firestone Tire & Rubber Salinas, CA., 8/1960-7/1961, 10/1961-6/1962, 5/1965- 12/1966 (3-4 weeks); IBM, Cottle Road, San Jose, CA., 1960 - 1962, 1965 - 1966, 1967-1972, 1977-1981; Lockheed, Sunnyvale, CA., 1960 - 1962, 1965 - 1966, 1967-1972, 1977-1981; University of California, Berkeley, CA., 8/1960-7/1961, 10/1961-6/1962, 5/1965-12/1966, 1/1967-3/1972, 4/1977-3/1981; UC Berkeley (Central Steam Plant), Berkeley, CA., 1960 - 1962, 1965 - 1966 (1 week), Standard Oil, Richmond, CA., 7/1961-10/1961, 7/1962-5/1965 (3 weeks, on and off), 10/1973-12/1973, 3/1974-3/1976, 10/1976-2/1977 (4 months, on and off), 1974 - 1977; University of California, Berkeley, CA. (Boiler Plant), 7/1961-10/1961, 7/1962-5/1965 (3 weeks); Sacramento Convention Center, Sacramento, CA., (16" St), 4/1972- 9/1973 (3 months, on and off}; Aerojet-General, Rancho Cordova, CA., 4/1972-9/1973 (18 working days); Bay View Housing Development (Hunters Point), San Francisco, CA,, 1978 (2 weeks, on and off); University of California, Berkeley, CA. (Warren Hail), 1979 (2 weeks), UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.,1980 - 1989,; 1990 - 1991, 1993, 1992-1993; University of California, Berkeley, CA. (Hearst Gym), 1981 (2 weeks, on and off); University of California, Berkeley, CA. (Gilman Hall), 1981 (1 week, on and off); University of California, Berkeley, CA. (Life Science Building}, 1981 (14 weeks, on and off); Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Vallejo, CA. (Building 503); 1981 (6 weeks, on and off); St. Francis Hospital, San Francisco, CA., 1982 (2 weeks, on and off), 1984 (1 week, on and off); University of California (Dwight Derby Schooi for the Deaf), Berkeley, CA., 1983 (1 week, on and off); University of California (Harmon Gym), Berkeley, CA., 1983 (Oct.-Dec.) (3 weeks, on and off); University of California (Robbins Hall), Berkeley, CA., 1983 (Oct.-Dec.) (2 weeks, on and off); Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Building 71, Vallejo, CA., 1984 (2 months, on and off); and Mare Island Naval Shipyard (Building 70), Vallejo, CA., 1985 (2 weeks, on and off). It is error to deny leave if a reasonable possibility exists to cure a claimed defect: It is an abuse of discretion for the court to deny leave to amend where there is any reasonable possibility that plaintiff can state a good cause of action. (Goodman v. Kennedy (1976) 18 Cal.3d 335, 349; (Okun v, Sup.Ct. (Maple Properties) (1981) 29 Cal.3d 442, 460.) iif sur S040 ia se ave COLL dom “4 PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY AND REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT COLLINS: ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC.’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINTCONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Court should take COLLINS ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC.’s Demurrer off calendar, without prejudice, and to grant plaintiffs at least 10 days’ leave to amend the Complaint herein to rectify and clarify the issue raised in said Demurrer. FE . FEB Dated: 17 20 BRAYTON¢PURCELL LLP By: 2 AS te Oren P. Noah Attorneys for Plaintiffs [To Comply with Department 220's rules regarding tentative rulings, yoa MUST call the Law & Motion Message Line (415) 493-3594 to give us notice if you wish to contest a tentative ruling, A copy of any email notification to Dept. 220 must be sent to contestasbestosTR@braytonlaw.com.] Kitnlured statis opp- req leave, COLEL.Cafemurer ad 3. “ PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY AND REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO AMEND: COMPLAINT TN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT COLLINS. ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC.’5 DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINTtoot OF DW AA & YW HN Be BD OD ww UY A HW PF WN BRAYTON@ PURCELL LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 222 RUSH LANDING ROAD PO BOX 6169 NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6169 (415) 898-1555 RN YP RM YN N NY KR eo W A A BO SS PROOF OF SERVICE BY LEXIS-NEXIS E-SERVICE Iam employed in the County of Marin, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and am not a party to the within action. My business address is 222 Rush Landing Road, P.O. Box 6169, Novato, California, 94948-6169. On February 17, 2011, I electronically served (E-Service), pursuant to General Order No. 158, the following documents: PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY AND REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT COLLINS ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER on the interested parties in this action by utilizing Lexis-Nexis E-service program pursuant to General Order No. 158, to transmit a true copy thereof to the following party(ies): SEE ATTA‘ LIST The above document(s) were transmitted by Lexis-Nexis E-Service. Executed on February 17, 2011, at Novato, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. a Diane 1 Davidowski Robert Ross, ¢t al. v. C.C. Moore & Co. Engineers, et al. San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-10-275731 PROOF OF SERVICE BY E-SERVICEDate Created: 2/16/2011-1:46:23 EM (DED) Brayton~Purceli Service List Created by: LitSupport - ServiceList ~- Reporting Matter Number: 19349.604 - Robert Ross Archer Norris P.O, Box 8035 . 2033 N. Main Street, Suite 800 Walnut Creek, CA. 925-930-6600 925-930-6620 (fax) Defendants: Albay Construction Company (ALBAY) Graybar Electric Company, Inc. (GRAYBR)} Bennett, Samuelsen, Reynolds & Allard 1301 Marina Village Parkway Suite 300 Alameda, CA 94501-1084 510-444-7688 510-444-5849 (fax) Defendants: Slakey Brothers, Inc. (SLAKEY) Breail & Breall 1255 Post Street, # 806 San Francisco, CA 94109 415-345-0545 Defendants: Joseph Bruno Sheet Metal Co., Inc, SMC Buty & Curliano $55'- 12" Street, Suite 1280 Oakland, CA 94607 510-267-3000 510-267-0117 (fax) Defendants: Critchfield Mechanical, Inc. (CRIMEC) Harold Beasley Plumbing ani Heating, Inc. (BEASLY) Foley & Mansfield PLLP 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1900 Oakland, CA 94612 510-590-9500 $10-590-9595 {fax) Defendants: Acco Engineered Systems, Inc. (ACCHEA D.W. Nichaison Corporation ome Fluor Corporation (FLUOR) one Bano Sheet Metal Haight, Brown & Bonesteel evenson Strect, 20" Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2981 415-546-7500 415-546-7505 (fax) Defendants: Kentile Floors, Inc. (KEN) i, Edlin, Huie & Blum LLP Pare alifornia Street, Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94104 415-397-9006 415-397-1339 (fax) Defendants: Balliet Bros. Construction Corporation (BALBRO) Berry & Bers P.O. Box 1607 2930 Lakeshore /Avenue Oakland, CA 94610 510+ 835-8330 510-835-117 (fax) Defendants: Berry & Berry (B&B) Brydon Hugo & Parker 135 Main Street, 20° Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 415-808-0300 415-808-0333 (fax) Defendants: A. Teichert & Son, Inc. (ATEICH, Bayer Cropstience Tne, AYGR Domeco Products Texas, Swinerton Builders Tue Footer. Manion, Jones, Hake, & Kurowski 201 Spear Street Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94105 415-512-4381 415-512-6791 (fax) Defendants: Collins E Electrical Company, Inc. {COLELC Emil J. Weber Electric Co. (e EMIL. Ww Temporary Plant Cleaners, Inc. (TEMPLA) Gordon & Rees LLP Shari Weintraub, Esq. 10f West Broad 16” Floor San Diego, CA 9210 619-696-6700 Defendants: Marsheo Auto Parts, Inc. (MARAPI) Hassard Bonnington LLP Two Embarcadero Center Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 9411 415-288-9800 415- 388.9802 (fax} Defendants: Henry C. Beck Company (HCBECK) Run By : Davidowski, Diane Beckerer, Kannett & Schweitzer Water Tower 1255 Fowell§ Sect Ei 94608-2604 510- 58 “3600 510- O58. 1151 (fax) Defendants: CSK Auto, Ine. (CSKAUT) Os Johnson Controls, Inc. (JOHCON) Bishop, Barry, Drath Waiergate ‘Tower i 2000 owell Srst Suite 1425 Emepulle 94608 510-59 ete” F056. 0899 (fax) Defendants: Foley Electric Co. (FOLELE) Burnham Brown 1901 Harrison Street 11 Floor Oakland, CA 94612 510-444-6800 I aa s.cebe (fax) Defendants: Bell Products Inc. (BELLFR) California Drywall Co. ‘GALDRY) Drinker Biddle & Reatk LLP 40 Fremont Strect, 20" Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2235 415-591-7500 415-591-7510 (fax) Defendants: Pharmacia Corporation, which will do business in California as Pharmacia Pharmaceutical Corporation (PHARCA) Gordon & Rees LLP. Embarcadero Center West 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 415-986-5900. 415-986-8054 (fax) eeadycar Tire & Rubber Company, Th joodyear Tire & Ru mpany, The (GOOBYR) pany Imai, Tadlock, Keeney & 6 & fordery, LLP 100 Bush Street, Suit 300 San Francisco, CA 94164 415-675-7000 415- 675-7008 (fax) Defendants: Clausen-Patten, Inc. (gesneny Commair Mechanical Services (COMMAR)Date Created: 2/16/2011-1:46:23 PM {DID} Brayton-Purcell Service List Created by: LitSupport ~ Servicelist - Reporting Matter Number: Jess Joseph Aguilar, Esq. Law Offices 31 East Jalian Sureet San Jose, CA_ 9511 408-279-; sito 408-279-8448 (fax) Defendants: Jones Plastering Company JONESP) Law Offices of Glaspy & Glaspy One Walnut Creek Center 100 Pringle Aver Avenue, Suite 750 Walnut CA 9: 925-947- 1300. obs 947.1304 (fax) Defendants: Fairmont Hotel Company (FAIRE) Manning & Kass, Elrod, Ramirez, Tester LLP 861 S. Figueroa Str Street, 15" Floor Los Any 213-1 SHRS500. Sis 624-6999 (fax) Defendants: Henry C. Beck Company (HCBECK) Pray, Price, Williams & Picking 355 East Ocean Bivd., Suite 310" Long Beach, CA 90: 802 562-435-6384 (fax) S62436-1951 Defendants: c 1 Investment Company, Inc. RAGG) pany, Steptoe & Johnson LLP 633 West Fath ee one Floor Los Angeles 213-43 380. ‘i 59.9599 (fax) ore at Life I ai fetropolitan Life Insurance Company (MET) Walsworth, Franklin, Bi icyins & McCall 601 Montg igomery Str Sues 3 Floor San Francisco, 415-781-7072. he 391-6258 (fax) Defendants: D. Zelinsky & Sons, Inc. (ZELIN! Su jen Engineering Co. EVER . Henry Company, Wabcor Huilders, inc. stb Wh 19349.004 ~ Robert Ross Last & Faoro 520 South El Camino Real Ste. 430 San Mateo, CA 650-696-8350 60:696-8365 {fax} Defendants: Allen-Simmons Heating & Sheet Metal Company Inc. (ALSIMS)Y Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP 22] North Figueroa Street Suite 1200 ‘Los Angeles, CA 9001. 213-259-1800 19380-7942 (fax) Defendants: tment C 1 investment Company, Inc. Riedy McGivne: 100 Prin; Suite 73 Walnut Creek, CA. 94596. 925-947-1300 925-947-1594 (fax) Defendants: Kentile Floors, Ine. (KEN) ‘5 Kluger & Glaspy le Avenue Prindle, Amaro, Goetz, Hillyard, Barnes & Reinholtz LLP. One California Street, Suite 1910 San Francisco, CA 94111 415-788-8354 “fst88- 3628 (fax) Defendants; JW. McClenahan Company, Inc. GWMCCL Red ie) lectric Co. Emeryville, Inc. (REDEL my fioddard, Pfeiffer, Bergquist & Wood 1470 Maria Lane, Suite: 90 Walnut Creek, CA. 925-938-6100 $05. 938-0354 (fax) Defendants: Walnut Creek Sheet Metal, Furnace & Air Conditioning, Inc. (WCSM) Run By : DavidowsKi, Diane a ee lin, Falbo, bevy & Moresi 535 eh 2" Street, #1900 Oakland, CA 94607 $10-628-0496 510-628- oss (fax) Defendants: Insulation Specialties, Inc. ONSULA) j Low, Ball & Lyngh | Street, 7° Bloor 505 Montgome: San Francisco, CA 94111-2584 415-981-6630 415-. 399-1306 (fax) Defendants: jiampolini & Co. (Gi! 0) Pane ie Ronancal coroyetion {PACMC! Poole & Shaffery, LLP 445 South Figueroa Street | Suite 2520 Los Angeles, CA 90071} 213-439-5390 213-439-0183 (fax) Defendants: H&C investment Associates, Ine. (H&CINV) ' | 2 Selman Breitman LLP 33 New Montgomery §* floor : San Francisco, CA 94105 415-979-0400" 415-979-2009 (fan) Defendants: Oakfabco, “inc. (OAKFAB Rountree Plumbing & Heating Inc. (RNTPLU) 1 Sweeney, Mason, Wilson a Bosomworth A Professional Law Corporation 983 University Ave., Suite 104C Los Gatos, CA 95032-7637 408-356-3000 408-354-8839 (fax) ea ene El tric Co. Es ‘lle, b ‘op Electric meri je, Inc. {REDEL] LE)