arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

BRAYTON@PURCELL LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 222 RUSH LANDING ROAD POBOX 6169 NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6169 (415) 898-1555 NN RN ND Nek eo YW HR SON = SO we NI DHA & WN = Oo Hw WD MH RB WN | DAVID R. DONADIO, ESQ., 8.B, #154436 | NANCY T. WILLIAMS, ESO., $.B. #201095 ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California, Novato, Calif 94948-6169 County of San Francisco jovato, California 415) 898-1555 MAR 08 2011 entative Ruling Contest Email: contestasbestosTR@braytonlaw.com Clerk of the Court BY: JUDITH NUNEZ BRAYTON&PURCELL LLP Attorneys at Law 222 Rush Landing Road P.O. Box 6169 | Attorneys for Plaintiffs ~ Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, ASBESTOS . . No. CGC-10-275731 Plaintiffs, . EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER vs. DIRECTING SERVICE OF SUMMONS ON DEFENDANT MARINE C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS; ENGINEERING AND SUPPLY Defendants as Reflected on Exhibit 1 . COMPANY, BY DELIVERY OF - attached to the Summary Complaint PROCESS TO SECRETARY OF STATE herein; and DOES 1-8500. CCP. § 416.20(b); Corp. Code § 201 1b); Koaner bom Coe §33 5] 8 Date: March 9, 2011 Time: 11:00 am. Dept.: 220, Hon. Harold E. Kahn Trial Date: N/A Filing Date: December 17, 2010 ea! eee Application is hereby made for an Order directing that process in the above-entitled action be served on defendant MARINE ENGINEERING AND SUPPLY COMPANY, (hereafter "defendant"), a dissolved corporation, by personally delivering to the California Seeretary of State, or to an assistant or deputy Secretary of State, two copies of the Brayton%Purcell LLP Master Complaint, together with two-copies of the Order herein requested. if T MARINE ENGINEERING AND SUPPLY COMPANY, BY DELVERY OF PRoeEss TO SECRETARY OF STATECoe mw NR KN OH FH YE Co DA wm FF wD BK VeoN hb NM wy ww w wy eSrynnetr ON OS L LEGAL ARGUMENT C.C.P. § 416.20 states that a summons may be served on a corporation which has forfeited its charter to do business or has been dissolved. C.C.P. § 416.20(b), by reference to Corp. Code § 2011, provides that service may be made upon a dissolved corporation by personal delivery to the Secretary of State or to an assistant or deputy Secretary of State of the Summons, Complaint and the Order. Under C.C.P. § 416.20(b) and Corp. Code § 2011(b), this Court may order that Summons or other process be served upon defendant by personally delivering a copy thereof, together with acopy of the Order, to the Secretary of State or an assistant or deputy Secretary of State. Corp. Code § 2011 became effective January 1, 1977. This Court may still order that © service upon defendant be made by personally delivering a copy thereof to the Secretary of State pursuant to the former Corp. Code § 3305, A true and correct copy of the text of former Corp. Code § 3305 is attached to the accompanying request for judicial notice. Former Corp. Code § 3305 states in relevant part: Summons or other process against a corporation dissolved on or after August 14, 1929, may be served by delivering a copy thereof to an officer, director, or other person having charge of its assets, or if no such person can be found, to any agent upon whom process might be served at the time of dissolution. [f none of such Persons ean be found with due diligence and it is shown to the satisfaction of the court or judge, then the court or judge may make an order that summons or other process be served upon the dissolved corporation by delivering a copy thereof, together with a copy of the order, to the Secretary of State or to an assistant or deputy secretary of state, Under Corp. Code § 2011 and former Corp. Code § 3305 service of summons by delivery of process to the Secretary of State is proper where no person having charge of the assets of a dissolved corporation is found in the exercise of due diligence. As set forth in the accompanying declaration of Montie Derby, filed herewith, all persons having charge of such assets are Mt Mit Wt K NInjured\9549\g\APP-XPT-SRV-CASOS-MARENG 2 EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ‘ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF SUMMONS 9 N DEFENDANT MARINE EXE ARR Ne aS SUPPLY COMPANY, BY DELIVERY OF PROCESS TO SECRETARY OF STATEnow deceased, and plaintiffs have not been able to locate any such other person in the exercise of due diligence. (See Declaration of Montie Derby, filed herewith.) Dated: z alt BRAYTON*PURCELL LLP By: fancy T. Williams Attorneys for Plaintiffs KAbjuredhi934 #-XPT-SRV-CASOS-MARENG, 3 EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF SUMMONS ON DEFEN| Dat MARINE ENGINEERING AND SUPPLY COMPANY, BY DELIVERY OF PROCESS TO SECRETARY OF S'