arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

oD MO YN DH BR WwW BY YE N NY DY NY ND RD NR RD ea ea a a i ony A nA BY HO &§ SF De UY He BF DB HP = GABRIEL A. JACKSON, State Bar No. 98119 ANTHONY C. CHIOSSO, State Bar No. 209014 JACKSON JENKINS RENSTROM LLP 55 Francisco Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94133 Tel: 415.982.6300 Fax: 415.982.6700 Attorneys for Defendant COSCO FIRE PROTECTION, INC. ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco APR 28 2011 Clerk of the Court BY: RAYMOND K. WONG Deputy Clerk IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ROBERT ROSS AND JEAN ROSS, Plaintiff, v. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS; Defendants as Reflected on Exhibit 1 attached to the Summary Complaint herein; and DOES 1-8500., et al. Defendants. Case No. CGC-10-275731 DEFENDANT COSCO FIRE PROTECTION, INC.’S OBJECTION TO STIPULATION OF HEARING BY COMMISSIONER PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant COSCO FIRE PROTECTION, INC., does not stipulate and hereby objects to any Discovery Commissioner hearing any discovery matter in this action pursuant to San Francisco Superior Court Rules. Dated: April 28, 2011 JACKSON JENKINS RENSTROM LLP By: /s/ ANTHONY C. CHIOSSO 1928262 ANTHONY C. CHIOSSO COSCO FIRE PROTECTION, INC. -I- DEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO STIPULATION OF HEARING BY COMMISSIONERCo em YN DHA FB WH = Roe ee ee we ee Be ee BRMRRERBRBRE BSE RDREBEESHEES Ross v. C.C. Moore & Co. Engineers, et al. S.F.S.C #CGC-10-275731 PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION I, the undersigned, declare that am a citizen of the United States and employed in San Francisco County, California. | am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within- entitled action. My business address is 55 Francisco Street, 6th Floor, San Francisco, California 94133. On April 28, 2011, | electronically served pursuant to General Order No. 158, the following document(s): DEFENDANT COSCO FIRE PROTECTION, INC.’S OBJECTION TO STIPULATION OF HEARING BY COMMISSIONER on interested parties in this action by causing Lexis Nexis E-Service program pursuant to General Order No. 158, to transmit a true copy thereof to the email address(es) of the following party(ies): BRAYTON PURCELL LLP and 222 Rush Landing Road eee i i jepee Novato CA 94948 Please See Lexis Nexis Service List The above document(s) were transmitted by Lexis Nexis E-Service and the transmission was reported as complete without error. | declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and was executed on April 28, 2011, at San Francisco, California. f{s/ JOYCE VIALPANDO Joyce Vialpando 1928262