arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

MATA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet May-03-2011 12:06 pm Case Number: CGC-10-275731 Filing Date: May-03-2011 12:06 Juke Box: 001 Image: 03200508 ORDER ROBERT ROSS et ai VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS 001C03200508 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.222 RUSH LANDING ROAD PO ROX 6169 NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6169 (415) 898-1555 BRAYTON@PURCELL LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW eC em NU DA HW BR YN we NM KRY NN NN NYSE BS Fe Be ee Be eB Se eo aan ek oN = So we YN DH BF WN YH SO DAVID R. DONADIO. ESR: S.B. #154436 SPut of Caltomia BRAYTON®PURCELL MAY 9 8 2014 Attorneys at Law CLERK OF T P.O. Box 6169 F Court: Novato, California 94948 BY. thi Ea (415) 898-1555 Sana Ere 222 Rush Landing Road Tentative Ruling Contest Email: contestasbestosTR@pbraytonlaw.com Attomeys for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO TID #3635345 ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, ASBESTOS No. CGC-10-275731 Plaintiffs, i“ vs. } ORVER DIRECTING SERVICE OF )} | MARINE ENGINEERING AND SUPPLY C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS; COMPANY, BY DELIVERY OF Defendants as Reflected on Exhibit 1 PROCESS TO SECRETARY OF STATE attached to the Summary Complaint _—SSsSSSSsSssSssssssssssesese herein; and DOES 1-8500. ) [C.C.P. § 416.20(b); Corp. Code § 2011(b)} Date: March 9, 2011 Time: 11:00 a.m. Dept.: 220, Hon. Harold E. Kahn Trial Date: N/A Filing Date: December 17, 2010 On reviewing the application of Brayton¢Purcell LLP on behalf of plaintiffs, the declaration of Nancy T. Williams for an Order Directing Service of Summons on Defendant MARINE ENGINEERING AND SUPPLY COMPANY, by delivery of process to Secretary of State, and it satisfactorily appearing to this Court that Defendant MARINE ENGINEERING AND SUPPLY COMPANY, was a domestic corporation, now forfeited or dissolved, and that all of Defendant's former corporate officers are deceased or unlocateable, and therefore Defendant cannot be served. “it Mit K Anjred\i9349%pld\ORD-XPT-SRV-CASOS-MARENG. 1 ‘KMjuredi9349\pld\ORD-XPT-SRV-CASOS-MARENG. pd ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF SUMMONS ON DEFENDANT MARINE ENGINEERING AND SUPPLY COMPANY BY DELIVERY OF PROCESS TO SECRETARY OF STATE7 ™~ ITIS ORDERED that service on Defendant MARINE ENGINEERING AND SUPPLY COMPANY be made by personal delivery to the Sccretary of State of California, or to an assistant or deputy secretary of state, of two copies of the Brayton¢*Purcell LLP Master Complaint along with a summons listing the actions. Moreover, two copies of this order shall also be served by personal delivery to the Secretary of State of California or to an assistant or deputy Secretary of State. Service is deemed complete on the tenth (10") day after delivery of the process to the Secretary of State. Dated:_4 lagly : VY Judge of the Superior Court HAROLD KAHN KAlsurasi 19349 ORD-XPT.SRV-CASOS-MARENG wp 2 ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF SUMMONS ON DEFENDANT MARINE ENGINEERING AND SUPPLY COMPANY BY DELIVERY OF PROCESS TO SECRETARY OF STATE