arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

ELECTRONICALLY FILED . Superior Court of California, DAVID R. DONADIO, ESQ., S.B. #154436 County of San Francisco BRAYTON®PURCELL LUP LLP Atiomeys at Law JUN 14 2011 222 Rush Landing Road Clerk of the Court P.O. Box 6169 BY: JUDITH NUNEZ Novato, California 94948-6169 po nuty Clerk (415) 898-1555 puty Attomeys for Plaintifis SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ROBERT ROSS and JRAN ROSS, ASBESTOS No. CGC-10-2757931 Plaintiffs, STIPULATION THAT ANSWER TO vs, ORIGINAL COMPLAINT MAY STAND AS ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED C.C. MOORE & CG. ENGINEERS, COMPLAINT Defendants as Reflected on Exhibit 1 attached to the Summary Complaint herein; and DOES 1-8500. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiffs and defendant below indicated, through their respective attorneys, that defendant's answer to the original Complaint herein may stand as defendant's answer to the Second Amended Complaint. All new matters are deemed controverted. Dated:___ (2 1 SUN BRAYTON®PURCELL LLP LLP LLP wy 8? “David K. Donadio Attomeys for Plaintiffs Dated; _June 10, 2011 Foley & Mansfield PLP. pee ae Beene yd Attomeys for Defendant FLUOR CORPORATION AAlajpaac Sa ttplPA ADT A AoA OP ed || STIPULATION THAT ANSWER TC ORIGINAL COMPLAINT MAY STAND AS ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINTa A nA & &Y Ce ow 10 ll 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Robert Ross and Jean Ross _vs. C.C. Moore & Co. Engineers, et al. San Francisco County Superior Case No. CGC-10-275731 Our File No. 10587.00219 PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION I, the undersigned, declare as follows: Tam employed in the County of Alameda, California, and I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action. My business address is 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1900, Oakland, CA, 94612. On the date executed below, I electronically served the documents(s) via LexisNexis File & Serve described as: « STIPULATION THAT ANSWER TO ORIGINAL COMPLAINT MAY STAND AS ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT on the recipients designated on the Transaction Receipt located on the LexisNexis File & Serve website. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on June 14, 2011, at Oakland, California. NEXNG 1 PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION