arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview 
						
                                
Preview

                                CIV-110

ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):

Alan R. Brayton (State Bar # S.B. #73685)
rayton <> Purcel.

222 Rush Landing Road
Novato, CA 94948
TELEPHONE NO: (415) 898-1555 FAX NO. (Optionay: (415) 898-1247
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional):
ATTORNEY FOR (Nemo): Plaintiff, ROBERT B. ROSS, et al.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF San Francisco
strect asoness: 400 McAllister Street

FOR COURT USE ONLY

ELECTRONICALLY
FILED

Superior Court of California,
County of San Francisco

MAILING ADDRESS:
erry ano zi cove: San Francisco 94102

RANCH NAME:

FEB 10 2012

Clerk of the Court
BY: WILLIAM TRUPEK

Deputy Clerk
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ROBERT B. ROSS, et al.

DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: C,C, MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS, et al,

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL .

X_] Personal Injury, Property Damage, or Wrongful Death

Motor Vehicle LX} Other

Family Law Eminent Domain

[3c] Other (specify) : Asbestos
~ A conformed copy will not be returned by the clerk unless a mothod of return is provided with the document, -

‘CASE NUMBER;

CGC-10-275731

1. TO THE CLERK: Please dismiss this action as follows:

a. (1) With prejudice (2) [X_] Without prejudice
b. (1) x] Complaint (2) Petition
(3) Cross-compilaint filed by (name): on (date):
(4) Cross-complaint filed by (name): on (dale):
(5) Entire action of all parties and all causes of action
(6) DX] Other (specify):* Claims arising from the May 2009 diagnosis of asbestosis and asbestos-related pleural disease

only, as defendant SLAKEY BROTHERS, INC. only.
2. (Complete in all cases except family law cases.)

Court fees and costs were waived for a party in this case. (This inform
checked, the declaration on the back of this form must be complet;
Date: February 9, 2012 >

obtained from the clerk, If this box is

Ce

(TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF X_| ATTORNEY PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY) (SIGNATURE)
“If cismisgal requested Is of specified parties only of specified causes of action Attorney or party without attorney for:

for Alan R.Brayton

iy 5 tal eet ae
oS Benes onseeconp Bit fo be dicniaced” and Ieenty the partes, XJ} Plaintiff/Petitioner Defendant/Respondent
Cross—Complainant
3. TO THE CLERK: Consent to the above dismissal Is hereby given.**
Date: >
ive on print name or CX] arrorney L__] parry witHour ATTORNEY) (SIGNATURE)
"If a cross-complaint - or Response (Family Law) seeking affirmative Attomey or party without attorney for:
Sign is Songentitroqurodby Gode of GM tainant (responder ea Plaintiff/Petitioner X] Defendant/Respondent
or. Cross-Complainant
(To be completed by clerk)
4, Dismissal entered as requested on (date):
5 Dismissal entered on (date): as to only (name):
6, [__] Dismissal not entered as requested for the following reasons (specify):
7a Attorney or party without attorney notified on (date):
b. [__] Attorney or party without attorney not notified. Filing party failed to provide
a copy to be conformed means to return conformed copy
Date: Clerk, by , Deputy
Pago 4 of 2

Gedo of Givi Procedure, § 581 el seq;
Gov, Code, § 68637(¢); Cel, Rules of Cou, rule 3.1395
‘wen. couilafo.ca.gov
FqvteRlactel®\ Avtamatad Corlania tndininl Coasanit Rowan

Form Adopted for Mandatory Use
Judicial Gouneil ef California
‘GIV-A10 (Rov, July 1, 2009}

REQUEST FOR DISMISSALGIV-110

| PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ROBERT B. ROSS, et al. CASE NUMBER:
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS, et al. CGC-10-275731

Declaration Concerning Waived Court Fees

The court has a statutory lien for waived fees and costs an any recovery of $10,000 or more in value by
settlement, compromise, arbitration award, mediation settlement, or other recovery. The court's lien must
be paid before the court will dismiss the case.

1. The court waived fees and costs in this action for (name):
2, The person in item 1 (check one):

a. is not recovering anything of value by this action.
b. (__] is recovering less than $10,000 in value by this action.
c. is recovering $10,000 or more in value by this action. (If item 2c is checked, item 3 must be completed.)
3. All court fees and costs that were waived in this actian have-been paid to the court (check one): Yes No

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information above is true and correct.

Date: _
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF| ATTORNEY [| PARTY MAKING DECLARATION} (SIGNATURE)
CIV-110 (Rev. duly 1, 2008) REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL Pago 2 of 2

LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Counctl FormsSo Oo ae NN OO oO B wry =

mw NM NM NM NM NY HN ew ww ow Be Se
NO an fF WY | 0D GC ON DW OH FF OW NY =

PROOF OF SERVICE

Case Name: Robert and Jean Ross v. C.C. Moore & Co. Engineers, et al.
Court: San Francisco Superior Court
Case No.: CGC-10-275731

| am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years and not a party to
the cause herein. | am an employee of BENNETT, SAMUELSEN, REYNOLDS &
ALLARD, A Professional Corporation, 1301 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 300,
Alameda, California 94501-1084. | am readily familiar with the standard business
practices of this office in connection with the mailing, delivering (via messenger and
overnight), facsimiling and e-file/serve via LexisNexis of documents from this office.

On February 10, 2012, | served the following listed documents(s), by method
indicated below, on the parties in this action:

Request for Dismissal [as to defendant Slakey Brothers, Inc. Only]

(V) ELECTRONIC SERVICE: By electronically transmitting the document(s) listed
above to LexisNexis File and Serve, an electronic filing service provider, at

www .fileandserve.lexisnexis,com pursuant to the Court’s Order mandating electronic
service. The transmission was reported as complete and without error,

| declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on February 10,
2012, in Alameda, California.

& - New,

B. Meier