arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

, LLP LAW OFFICES KEENEY & CORDERY, IMAI, TADLOCK, (415) 675-7000 0 OW DN DAW 10 i 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Theodore T. Cordery, Esq. (Bar No. 114730) Stephen E. Carlson, Esq. (Bar No. 104279) Tina Yim, Esq. (Bar No. 232597) IMAL TADLOCK, KEENEY & CORDERY, LLP ELECTRONICALLY 100 BUSH STREET, SUITE 1300 FILED SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 Superior Court of California, Telephone: (415) 675-7000 County of San Francisco Facsimile: (415) 675-7008 MAR 23 2012 Clerk of the Court Attorneys for Defendant BY: WILEIAM TRUPEK HENRY C. BECK COMPANY Deputy Clerk IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, CASE NO.: CGC-10-275731 (ASBESTOS) Plaintiffs, DECLARATION OF TINA YIM IN v. SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT HENRY C. BECK COMPANY’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS; CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS AND Defendants as Reflected on Exhibit 1 attached | . CONTINUE TRIAL DATE to the Summary Complaint herein; and DOES 1-8500., Complaint Filed: December 17, 2010 Trial Date: Not yet set Defendants. Date: April 2, 2012 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept: 503 Judge: Hon. Teri L. Jackson I, Tina Yim, declare: 1. Iam an attorney at law duly licensed to practice law before all the courts of the State of California and am an associate with Imai, Tadlock, Keeney & Cordery, LLP, attorneys of record for defendant HENRY C. BECK COMPANY, in the above-entitled matter. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the relevant portions of Robert Ross’ Complaint captioned Robert Ross v. Asbestos Defendants (BP), San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-07-274099. -l- DECLARATION OF TINA YIM.IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT HENRY C. BECK COMPANY’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS AND CONTINUE TRIAL DATE‘LAW OFFICES SUITE. 1300 100 BUSH STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 IMAI, TADLOCK, KEENEY & CORDERY, LLP (415) 675-7000. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the relevant portions of Plaintiffs Robert and Jean Ross’ Complaint captioned Robert Ross and Jean Ross v. C.C. Moore & Co. Engineers, et al., San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-10-275731. 4, Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of dismissals of claims arising from the May 2009 diagnosis of asbestosis and asbestos-related pleural disease of defendants Webcor Builders, Inc.; Henry C. Beck Company; Commair Mechanical Services; Clausen: Patten, Inc.; H & C Investment Associates; Giampolini & Company; Pacific Mechanical Corporation; Cahill Construction Services, Inc.; Slakey Brothers, Inc.; Albay Construction Company; Foley Electric, Inc.; California Drywall Co.; Johnson Controls, Inc.; Temporary Plant Cleaners, Inc.; A. Teichert & Son, Inc.; Swinerton Builders; Kentile Floors, Inc.;. Van-Mulder Sheet Metal, Inc.; ACCO Engineered Systems, Inc.; D.W. Nicholson Corporation; Marshco Auto Parts, Inc.; J.W. McClenahan Company, Inc.; Red Top Electric Co. Emeryville, Inc.; I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at San Francisco, California on.March 23, 2012. -2- DECLARATION OF TINA YIM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT HENRY C. BECK COMPANY'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS AND CONTINUE TRIAL DATELAW OFFICES , LLP 'Y & CORDERY, 00 IMAI, TADLOCK, KEEN! suin SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 (415) 675-7000 PROOF OF SERVICE I, Heather Cherry, declare: Tam a resident of the State of California and over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the within action; my business address is 100 Bush Street, Suite 1300, San Francisco, CA 94104. On the date of execution below, I served the within documents: DECLARATION OF TINA YIM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT HENRY C. BECK COMPANY’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS AND CONTINUE TRIAL DATE by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax number(s) set forth below on this date before 5:00 p.m. by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at San Francisco, California addressed as set forth below. by personally delivering the document(s) listed above to the person(s) at the address(es) set forth below. > On the date of execution below, I electronically served the document via LexisNexis File & Serve on the recipients designated on the Transaction Receipt located on the LexisNexis File & Serve Web site. Brayton Purcell, LLP 222 Rush Landing Road Novato, CA 94945-2469 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. Executed on. March 23, 2012, at San Francisco, California. /s/ Heather Cherry Heather Cherry Ross, Robert and Jean v. CC. Moore & Co. Engineers, (HCB). SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT NO. CGC-10-275731 3- DECLARATION OF TINA YIM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT HENRY C. BECK COMPANY'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS AND CONTINUE TRIAL DATE