arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

LAW OFFICES IMAI, TADLOCK, KEENEY & CORDERY, LLP 100 BUSH STREET SUITE 1360 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 (415) 675-7000 bB woN Bruce Imai, Esq. (Bar No. 053800) Tina Yim, Esq. (Bar No. 232597) IMAI, TADLOCK, KEENEY & CORDERY, LLP RONICALLY 100 BUSH STREET, SUITE 1300 ELECTRONIC SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 FILED Telephone: (415) 675-7000 Superior Court of California, Facsimile: (415) 675-7008 County of San Francisco MAR 26 2012 Clerk of the Court BY: WILLIAM TRUPEK Deputy Clerk Attorneys for Defendant COMMAIR MECHANICAL SERVICES IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, CASE NO.: CGC-10-275731 (ASBESTOS) Plaintiffs, DECLARATION OF TINA YIM IN v. SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT COMMAIR MECHANICAL SERVICES’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS, et al., CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS AND CONTINUE TRIAL DATE Defendants. Complaint Filed: December 17, 2010 Trial Date: Not yet set Date: April 2, 2012 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept: 503 Judge: Hon. Teri L. Jackson I, Tina Yim, declare: 1. lam an attorney at law duly licensed to practice law before all the courts of the State of California and am an associate with Imai, Tadlock, Keeney & Cordery, LLP, attorneys of record for defendant COMMAIR MECHANICAL SERVICES, in the above-entitled matter. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the relevant portions of Robert Ross’ Complaint captioned Robert Ross v. Asbestos Defendants (BP), San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-07-274099. -1- DECLARATION OF TINA YIM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT COMMAIR MECHANICAL SERVICES’ OPPOSITION TO PILAINTIFFS' MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS AND CONTINUE TRIAL DATBLAW OFFICES LLP SUITE 1360 KEENEY & CORDERY, IMAI, TADLOCK, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 (415) 675-7000 0 OM ND HM FB YW NO DN Y N YN NN NY SB Be Be we we Be eB ew Be oe AYA we oN SF 5S Oe AAA BBD H FS 3. Attached hereto-as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the relevant portions of Plaintiffs Robert and Jean Ross’ Complaint captioned Robert Ross and Jean Ross v. C.C. Moore & Co. Engineers, et al., San Francisco Superior Court Casé No. CGC-10-275731. 4, Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of dismissals of claims arising from the May 2009 diagnosis of asbestosis and asbestos-related pleural disease of defendants Webcor Builders, Inc.; Henry C. Beck Company; Commair Mechanical Services; Clausen Patten, Inc.; H & C Investment Associates; Giampolini & Company; Pacific Mechanical Corporation; Cahill Construction Services, Inc.; Slakey Brothers, Inc.; Albay Construction Company; Foley Electric, Inc.; California Drywall Co.; Johnson Controls; Inc,; Temporary Plant Cleaners, Inc.; A. Teichert & Son, Inc.; Swinerton Builders; Kentile Floors, Inc.; Van-Mulder Sheet Metal, Inc., ACCO Engineered Systems, Inc.; D.W. Nicholson Corporation; Marshco Auto Parts, Inc.; J.W. McClenahan Company, Inc.; Red Top Electric Co. Emeryville, Inc.; I declate under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at San Francisco, California on March 23, 2012. 2. DECLARATION OF TINA YIM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT WEBCOR BUILDERS, INC.’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIEFS' MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS AND CONTINUE TRIAL DATE» LLP LAW OFFICES KEENEY & CORDERY, IMAI, TADLOCK, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 24104 (415) 675-7000 wn oc Oo ND 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, declare: Tam a resident of the State of California and over the age of eightcen years, and not a party to the within action; my business address is 100 Bush Street, Suite 1300, San Francisco, CA 94104. On the date of execution below, I served the within documents: DECLARATION OF TINA YIM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT COMMAIR MECHANICAL SERVICES’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS AND CONTINUE TRIAL DATE by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax number(s) set forth below on this date before 5:00 p.m. by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at San Francisco, California addressed as set forth below. by personally delivering the document(s) listed above to the person(s) at the address(es) set forth below. >} On the date of execution below, I electronically served the document via LexisNexis File & Serve on the recipients designated on the Transaction Receipt located on the LexisNexis File & Serve Web site. Brayton Purcell, LLP 222 Rush Landing Road Novato, CA 94945-2469 Jam readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter datc is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. Executed on March 23, 2012, at San Francisco, California. Samantha Oryal: Ross, Robert and Jean v. C.C. Moore & Co. Engineers, ct al.. SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT NO. CGC-10-275731 _3- DECLARATION OF TINA YIM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT COMMAIR MECHANICAL SERVICES’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS AND CONTINUE TRIAL DATE