arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

Co SF ND TR DW Ne a a a a a a nn nN DF F&F OO NH RF DS BryDON Huco & PARKER TS Main SeREcT 20" FLOOR ‘Sart Franciseo, CA 94105 Edward R. Hugo [Bar No. 124839] P.M. Bessette [Bar No. 127588] Josette D. Johnson [Bar No. 195977] BRYDON HUGO & PARKER ELECTRONICALLY 135 Main Street, 20th Floor FILED San Francisco, CA 94105 Superior Court of California, Telephone: (415) 808-0300 County of San Francisco Facsimile: (415) 808-0333 FEB 20 2013 Email: service@bhplaw.com Clerk of the Court Attorneys for Defendant BY: ALISON ae puty Clerk SWINERTON BUILDERS SUPERIOR COURT - STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, (ASBESTOS) Case No. CGC-10-275731 Plaintiffs, vs. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF SWINERTON BUILDERS C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS, et al, | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. {Filed Concurrently With Notice of Motion; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Separate Statement; and Declaration of Josette D. Johnson] Date: May 9, 2013 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept: 503 Judge: Hon. Teri L. Jackson Complaint Filed: | December 17, 2010 Trial Date: June 10, 2013 Defendant SWINERTON BUILDERS hereby requests that the Court take judicial notice of the following documents pursuant to Evidence Code §452 (d): 1. Declaration of Howard Spielman and exhibits thereto, filed in Eugene Millard v. Associated Insulation of California, Superior Court of the County of San Francisco, case No. CGC-09-275091. A true and correct copy of said declaration is attached as Exhibit H to the Declaration of Josette D. Johnson in Support of Swinerton Builders’ Motion for Summary 1 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT SWINERTON BUILDERS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENTCo SF ND TR DW Ne a a a a a a nn nN DF F&F OO NH RF DS BryDON Huco & PARKER TS Main SeREET 20" FLOOR ‘Sart Franciseo, CA 94105 Judgment (“Johnson Decl.”). 2. Declaration of Richard Cohen filed by plaintiff in Betty Peterson, et al., v. Associated Insulation of California, et al., Superior Court of the County of San Francisco, case No. CGC-10-275498. A true and correct copy of said declaration is attached as Exhibit J to the Johnson Decl. 3. Declaration of Richard Cohen filed by plaintiff in John Casey et al., v. Asbestos Defendants, Superior Court of the County of San Francisco, case No. CGC-10-275517. A true and correct copy of said declaration is attached as Exhibit K to the Johnson Decl. 4, Declaration of Richard Cohen filed by plaintiff in Steven Peterson v. Asbestos Defendants, Superior Court of the County of San Francisco, case No. CGC-08-274707. A true and correct copy of said declaration is attached as Exhibit M to the Johnson Decl. 5. Order granting Robertshaw Controls Company’s motion for summary judgment in the matter of Eugene Millard v. Asbestos Defendants, Superior Court of the County of San Francisco, case No. CGC-09-275091, finding that sophisticated user defense is applicable. The court’s order implicitly finds that plaintiff Millard, and his union, Asbestos Workers local 16 in San Francisco, were sophisticated users of asbestos. A true and correct copy of Order is attached as Exhibit L to the Johnson Decl. Dated: February 20, 2013 BRYDON HUGO & PARKER By: _/s/ Josette D. Johnson. Josette D. Johnson Attorneys for Defendant SWINERTON BUILDERS 2 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT SWINERTON BUILDERS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT