arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

~ ow DH .° 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stephen J. Foley © SBN 220752 Dennis M. Young SBN 121178 Roger D. Yuen SBN 221243 FOLEY & MANSFIELD, PLLP ELECTRONICALLY 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1900 FILED Oakland, CA 94612 Superior Court of Califosnia, Telephone: (510) 590-9500 County of San Francisto Facsimile: (510) 590-9595 FEB 21 201 E-mail: ryuen@foleymansfield.com Clerk of the Cou BY: CAROL BALISTRERE Attorneys for Defendant Deputy |Clerk LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, Case No: CGC-10-275731 Plaintiffs, *Asbestos-Related Case” vs. DEFENDANT LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS, et al., MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR| IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY Defendants. ADJUDICATION Date: May 9, 2013 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept.: 303 Judge: Hon. Teri L. Jackson Complaint Filed: December 17, 2010 Trial Date: June 10, 2013 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on May 9, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in Department 503 of the Superior Court of California for the County of San Francisco, Defendant LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC. (hereinafter “LST”’) will hereby move this Court for summary judgment, or in the alternative, summary adjudication, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 437c on the following grounds: ad Plaintiffs ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS (“Plaintiffs”) will be unable to present competent evidence establishing a triable issue of material fact and lack any evidence establishing that Mr. Ross was actually exposed to respirable asbestos fibers attributable to an 1 DEFENDANT LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION~ ow DH .° 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LSI product. (2) Plaintiffs’ Causes of Action for Negligence and Strict Liability Fail as a matter of law as they cannot establish that Mr. Ross was exposed to respirable asbestos fibers to a product attributable to LSI. (3) Plaintiff's employer, as well as Plaintiff himself, are sophisticated users, and, as such, any cause of action relating to failure to warn is precluded against LSI. (4) Plaintiffs’ cause of action for loss of consortium fails as a matter of law as Plaintiffs cannot establish a triable issue of material fact as to any of their causes of actions. (5) There is no evidence, much less “clear and convincing” evidence, that LSI acted with oppression, malice, or fraud to warrant an award of punitive damages. This Motion is based upon this Notice of Motion, the supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities, the Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, the Declaration of Roger D. Yuen, the Court’s files and record herein, any and all exhibits produced during the pleading stages of this Motion, and all oral and documentary evidence, if any, produced before or at the hearing of this Motion. DATED: February 21, 2013 FOLEY & MANSFIELD, PLLP By: Ae a Stephen J. Foley Dennis M. Young Roger D. Yuen Attorneys for Defendant LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC, 2 DEFENDANT LONE STAR INDUSTRIES, INC.’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION