arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

wow en Dw FF WN & Ny YY NY NY NN NY NSO Be BS BP OS Se PS El Pl NF GG 8 OD NM & SG CC DWN BD UW fF WB NH SF DS 28 BryDON, HUGO & PARKER 135 MAINSTREET 20 FLOOR San Francisco, CA 94205, Edward R. Hugo [Bar No. 124839} P.M Bessette [Bar No. 127588] Josette D. Johnson [Bar Nb. 195977] BRYDON HUGO & PARKER ELECTRONICALLY 135 Main Street, 20th Floor FILED San Francisco, CA 94105 Superior Court of California, Telephone: (415) 808-0300 County of San Francisco Facsimile: (415) 808-0333 FEB 20 2013 Email: service@bhplaw.com Clerk of the Court Attorneys for Defendant BY: ALISON aoe puty Clerk RO EE PLUMBING & HEATING, INC. SUPERIOR COURT - STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, (ASBESTOS) Case No. CGC-10-275731 Plaintiffs, vs. DECLARATION OF JOSETTE D. JOHNSON IN SUPPORT OF C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS, et al., | ROUNTREE PLUMBING & HEATING, INC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY Defendants. JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION [Filed Concurrently With Notice of Motion; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Separate Statement; Request for Judicial Notice; Declaration of Josette D. Johnson] Date: May 9, 2013 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept: 503 Judge: Hon. Teri L. Jackson Complaint Filed: | December 17, 2010 Trial Date: June 10, 2013 L JOSETTE D. JOHNSON, declare as follows: 1. Lam an attorney licensed to practice before all the courts of the State of California and am a senior associate with the law firm of Brydon Hugo & Parker, attorneys of record for Defendant Rountree Plumbing & Heating, Inc. in the above-referenced matter. Ihave personal knowledge of the facts stated herein, or have gained such knowledge from 1 DECLARATION OF JOSETTE D. JOHNSON IN SUPPORT OF ROUNTREE PLUMBING & HEATING, INC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATIONwow en Dw FF WN & Ny YY NY NY NN NY NSO Be BS BP OS Se PS El Pl NF GG 8 OD NM & SG CC DWN BD UW fF WB NH SF DS 28 BryDON, HUGO & PARKER 135 MAINSTREET 20 FLOOR San Francisco, CA 94205, my review of the records and documents maintained in our file in the regular course of business and, if called as a witness, I could and would testify competently thereto. 2. Attached hereto as Amended Complaint. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff’s Third Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of request for dismissal of plaintiffs’ false representation and punitive damages claims. 4. Attached hereto as Interrogatories to Plaintiffs (Set One). 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of Rountree’s Special Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Rountree’s Special Interrogatories, Set One. 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of pertinent portions of plaintiff Robert Ross's transcript of deposition in the matter of Robert Ross v. Asbestos Defendants, San Francisco County 7. Attached hereto as Superior Court, case number 274099, Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of pertinent portions of plaintiff Robert Ross’s transcript of deposition in this action. 8. Attached hereto as of the transcript of deposition of Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of pertinent portions Robert Cantley taken in the matter of Robert Ross v. Asbestos Defendants, San Francisco County Superior Court, case number 274099. 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of Declaration of Howard Spielman and exhibits thereto, filed in Eugene Millard v. Associated Insulation of California, Superior Court of the County 10. Attached hereto as deposition of Stephen Steele, taken in the County of San Francisco, case No. 11. Attached hereto as Exhibit Exhibit of San Francisco, case No. CGC-09-275091. is a true and correct copy of transcript of Sylvia Currier v. Asbestos Defendants, Superior Court of CGC-06-454323, dated August 21, 2009. is a true and correct copy of declaration of Richard Cohen filed by plaintiff in Betty Peterson, et al., v. Associated Insulation of California, et al., Superior Court of the County of San Francisco, case No. CGC-10-275498. 2 DECLARATION OF JOSETTE D. JOHNSON IN SUPPORT OF ROUNTREE PLUMBING & HEATING, INC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATIONwow en Dw FF WN & Ny YY NY NY NN NY NSO Be BS BP OS Se PS El Pl NF GG 8 OD NM & SG CC DWN BD UW fF WB NH SF DS 28 BryDON, HUGO & PARKER 135 MAINSTREET 20 FLOOR San Francisco, CA 94205, 12. Attached hereto as Exhibit K is a true and correct copy of declaration of Richard Cohen filed by plaintiff in John Casey et al., v. Asbestos Defendants, Superior Court of the County of San Francisco, case No. CGC-10-275517. 13. Attached hereto as Exhibit L is a true and correct copy of Order granting Robertshaw Controls Company’s motion for summary judgment in the matter of Eugene Millard v, Asbestos Defendants, Superior Court of the County of San Francisco, case No. CGC-09-275091, finding that sophisticated user defense is applicable. The court’s order implicitly finds that plaintiff Millard, and his union, Asbestos Workers local 16 in San Francisco, were sophisticated users of asbestos. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February 20, 2013, at San Francisco, Califomia. osgtte D. Johnson 3 DECLARATION OF JOSETTE D. JOHNSON IN SUPPORT OF ROUNTREE PLUMBING & HEATING, INC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION