arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

Jeffrey S. Gillespie, State Bar No, 192495 Walter C. Rundin, State Bar No. 072475 BURNHAM BROWN ELECTRONICALLY A Professional Law Corporation P.O, Box 119 FILED Oakland, California 94604 Superior Court of California, a County of San Francisco 1901 Harrison Street, 14th Floor FEB 21 2013 Oakland, California 94612 Clerk of the Court Telephone: (510) 444-6800 BY: ALISON AGBAY Facsimile: (510) 835-6666 Deputy Clerk Attorneys for Defendant CALIFORNIA DRYWALL CO. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, No. CGC-10-275731 Plaintiffs, DECLARATION OF WALTER C. RUNDIN IN SUPPORT OF Vv. DEFENDANT CALIFORNIA DRYWALL CO.’S MOTION FOR C.C. MOORE & CO, ENGINEERS; SUMMARY ADJUDICATION Defendants As Reflected on Exhibit 1 attached to the Summary Complaint herein; Date: May 9, 2013 and DOES 1-8500, Time: 9:30a.m. Dept.: 503 Defendants. Judge: Hon, Teri L. Jackson 3rd Amend Cmplit Filed: May 11, 2012 _ . Trial Date: June 10, 2013 1, WALTER C. RUNDIN, do hereby declare: 1. lam an attomey licensed to piactice before all courts in the State of Califomia. Iam a senior associate with the law firm of Burnham Brown, attorneys of record for Defendant CALIFORNIA DRYWALL CO. (“California Drywall”) in this action. The following is based on my personal knowledge and, if called as a witness, I could and would testify competently thereto. 2. Attached to the California Drywall’s Index of Documentary Evidence [hereinafter “Index”] as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the Third Amended Complaint in this matter. 3. Attached to the Index as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff Robert Ross’ response to California Drywall’s Special Interrogatories, 1 DECLARATION OF WALTER C. RUNDIN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT No. CGC-16-273731 CALIFORNIA DRYWALL CO.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATIONoD OB wR DR A BR WH RB RP RP RP BRB R RP RR Ee RB Be ee me ome ee ee 2a A HG & OB BSB BR SF © ee BE RD Hh FE RB NH SB S 4, Attached to the Index as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of California Drywall’s Special Interrogatories to Plaintiff Robert Ross. 5, Attached to the Index as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff Robert Ross’ response to California Drywall’s Supplemental Interrogatories. 6. Attached to the Index as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of California Drywall’s Supplemental Interrogatories to Plaintiff Robert Ross. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this Declaration was executed on February 21, 2013, at Oakland, California. WU poAz WALTER C, RUNDIN 4817-2786-6898, ¥. 1 2 DECLARATION OF WALTER C: RUNDIN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT No, CGC-10-273731 CALIFORNIA DRYWALL CO.’$ MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION