arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

Cm Ww KH Rh kh YW BP RP NR BRB NY RP NN SB RP RF BR Re ee ee ee Se 2H we BF GB YN SF SF Be ew A RH BF BW HR =e S Jeffrey 8, Gillespie, State Bar No, 192495 Walter C. Rundin, State Bar No, 072475 BURNHAM BROWN A Professional Law Corporation P.O. Box 119 Oakland, California 94604 1901 Harrison Street, 14th Floor Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 444-6800 Facsimile: (510) 835-6666 Attorneys for Defendant CALIFORNIA DRYWALL CO. ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco FEB 21 2013 Clerk of the Court BY: ALISON AGBAY Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, Plaintiffs, v. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS; Defendants As Reflected on Exhibit 1 attached to the Summary Complaint herein; and DOES 1-8500, Defendants. No. CGC-10-275731 DEFENDANT CALIFORNIA DRYWALL CO.’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION Date: May 9, 2013 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept. 503 Judge: Hon, Teri L. Jackson Supporting documents filed with this Notice: Memorandum of Points and Authorities, Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts; Index of Documentary Evidence with Exhibits A through E; Declaration of Walter C. Rundin; Declaration af Kent Bowles; [Proposed] Order; Proof of Service 3rd Amend Cmplit Filed: May 11, 2012 Trial Date: June 10, 2013 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on May 9, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., or as soon theréafter as this matter may be heard in Department 503 of the above-entitled court, Defendant CALIFORNIA DRYWALL CO. (“California Drywall”) will move and hereby does move for an order for summary adjudication in favor of California Drywall and against Plaintiffs ROBERT ROSS and : 1 DEFENDANT CALIFORNIA DRYWALL CO.'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION No. CGC-10-275731ee UW KD Rh ke BH RP Rom RR RP RP R MN NR RP Se ee Be oe oR SP eB Se & 39 F& & 8 BB 8 fF FSF FC eB A RA Bw HM S JEAN ROSS (“Plaintiffs”) for costs of suit incurred herein, and for such other and further relief as may be just and proper. Defendant California Drywall’s motion for summary adjudication is based upon the ground that Plaintiffs have no evidence to support their strict liability cause of action against this defendant which is not a legally cognizable cause of action against a contractor defendant such as California Drywall. ‘This motion is based on this notice of motion and motion, separate statement of undisputed material facts, the memorandum of points and authorities, the declarations of Walter C. Rundin and Kent Bowles and the index of documentary evidence attached to this notice and served and filed herein, as well as papers and pleadings on file in this action, and such other further evidence and/or testimony as may be presented at the hearing. DATED: February 21, 2013 BURNHAM BROWN Nhe. Porn WALTER C. RUNDIN Attorneys for Defendant CALIFORNIA DRYWALL CO. 4831-8345-2274, v. 1 ~ 2. DEFENDANT CALIFORNIA DRYWALL COS NOTICE OF MOTION AND No. CGC-10-275731 MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION