arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

BUTY & CURLIANO 28 uP 555. 12" StRcET ‘Sue 1260 CAo¢607 "540.287.3000, MADELINE L. BUTY [SBN 157186] GEORGE S. SULLIVAN [SBN 187793] BUTY & CURLIANO LLP 555 — 12" Street, Suite 1280 ELECTRONICALLY Oakland, California 94607 FILED Tel; 510.267.3000 . oe Bex: $102670117 sete cf tain Email: mlb@pbutycurliano.com FEB 22 2013 jsullivan@butycurliano.com Clerk of the Court Attomeys for Defendant BY: WESLEY ork S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, No. CGC-10-275731 Plaintiffs, DEFENDANT S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.’S NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION Date: May 9, 2013 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept: 503 v. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS; et al., Defendants. Trial: June 10, 2013 Ne ee a a il ae el el Ne ee el TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on May 9, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. in Room 503 of the San Francisco Superior Court located at 400 McAllister Street in San Francisco, California, defendant S.J. Amoroso Construction, Co., Inc. (“Amoroso”) will, and hereby does, move this court for an order granting summary judgment. Hil 1 DEFENDANT S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.’S NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY SUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION28 BUTY RCURLANO LLP Sh 12Sracer ‘Sue 1 OAKLAND, CA 95607 "510.287 8000 Amoroso is entitled to summary judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 437¢ because plaintiffs cannot establish Amoroso’s employees were negligent when they disturbed purportedly asbestos-containing materials in plaintiff Robert Ross’s presence. Alternatively, Amoroso seeks summary adjudication on plaintiffs’ Second Cause of action for Strict Liability because Amoroso was not in the business of selling asbestos products. Amoroso also seeks summary adjudication on Jean Ross’s Fourth Cause of Action for Loss of Consortium because it is purely derivative of Mr. Ross’s claims. This motion is based on this notice, memorandum of points and authorities, separate statement of undisputed material facts, declaration of George S. Sullivan and all supporting exhibits, the papers and pleadings on file in this action, and on such other further oral and documentary evidence presented at the hearing on this motion. DATED; February 21, 2013 BUTY & CURLIANO LLP mS She GEORGE S"SULLIVAN Al leys for Defendant 8. lOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 2 DEFENDANT S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.’S NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY ADJUDICATIONoD Oo me ND 28 BUTY & CURLIANOLLP. 385-12" 51REET ue (OAKLAND, CA 94807 910.207 $000 PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION I declare that: Iam employed in the County of Alameda, California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within entitled cause; my business address is 555 - 12" Street, Suite 1280, Oakland, CA 94607. I served the following document(s) via LexisNexis File & Serve as described as: DEFENDANT S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.’S NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION w/SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS; EVIDENCE; and DECLARATION OF GEORGE S. SULLIVAN on recipients designated on the Transaction Receipt located on the LexisNexis File & Serve website. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February 21, 2013, in Oakland, California. Rogan Balinton ‘sl Regaw Balintow Print Signature 3 DEFENDANT S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO.,, INC.’S NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION