arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview 
						
                                
Preview

                                fs WN

28
BUTY BCURLANOLLE
885.12" SrREEY

‘Sure 1280
‘OAKLAND, CA 04607
‘SHo.2e7.$000"

MADELINE L, BUTY [SBN 157186]
GEORGE S. SULLIVAN [SBN 187793]

BUTY & CURLIANO LLP
555 — 12" Street, Suite 1280 ELECTRONICALLY
Oakland, California 94607 FILED
Tel: 510.267.3000 Superior Court of California,
Fax: 510.267.0117 County of San Francisco
Email: mlb@butycurliano.com FEB 22 2013

jsullivan@butycurliano.com Clerk of the Court

. BY: WI

Attorneys for Defendant esuey o Sepety Clerk

S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO — UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, No, CGC-10-275731

Plaintiffs, EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANT S.J. AMOROSO
CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR,
ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION

Vv.
C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS; et al.,
Defendants.
Date: May 9, 2013
Time: 9:30 a.m.
Dept: 503

Trial: June 10, 2013

ee ee eee eee

Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(b) and Rule 3.1350 of the California

” Rules of Court, defendant S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., inc. (“Amoroso”) submits the following

evidence in support of its motion for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication.
tif
iif

1
EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY ADJUDICATIONOo Oe MW NR WH BR WN

NW NM NY BN DW BD Qe em mt
aI A G&G 8B BN SF SF OD we NY DH BF BN =

28

BUTY A CURLIANOLLP
555-12" Sacer

EVIDENCE

Declaration of George S. Sullivan in Support of S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc.’s

Motion for Summary Judgment or, Alternatively, Summary Adjudication, with attached Exhibits A
through Y:

e Exhibit A — Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint for Personal Injury and Loss of
Consortium — Asbestos

e Exhibit B— Defendants’ Standard Interrogatories to Plaintiff (Personal Injury), Set 1

e Exhibit C Plaintiffs’ Answers to Interrogatories

e Exhibit D — Title Page, Pages 300-301, 1479, 1505-1506, 1651-1654, 1784-1810, 2928-
2930, and 3021-3030, and reporter’s certificate from the deposition of Robert Ross in San
Francisco Superior Court Case No. 274099

¢ Exhibit E - Title Page, Pages 743-756, and 2206-2208, and reporter’s certificate from the
deposition of Robert Ross in San Francisco Superior Court Case No. 275731

e Exhibit F —Title Page, Pages 1304-1305, 1309-1311, and 1314-1315, and reporter’s
certificate from the deposition of Robert Cantley in San Francisco Superior Court Case No.
274099

e Exhibit G —§.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc.’s Special Interrogatories to Plaintiffs, Set
One

e Exhibit H— S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc.’s Request for Production of Documents to
Plaintiffs, Set One

e Exhibit I - S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc.’s Request for Admissions to Plaintiffs, Set
One

e Exhibit J— S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc.’s Form Interrogatories to Plaintiffs, Set
One

e Exhibit K ~ Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant $.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc.’s
Special Interrogatories, Set One and verification

e Exhibit L — Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc.’s

Request for Production of Documents, Set One and verification
2

EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT S.J, AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION28

BUTY S CURLIANOLLE
855-12" Srrecr
‘sure 1200)
‘OAKLARD, CA 94607
‘510.267 3000

« Exhibit M — Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc.’s
Requests for Admission, Set One and verification

e Exhibit N — Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc.’s Form
Interrogatories, Set One and verification

¢ Exhibit O —Title Page, Pages 229-240, 524-525, 575-576, 580-581, 605-625, 633-644,
656-661, 670-674, 701-706, 716-732, 780-782, 792-794, and 994-1003, and reporter’s
certificate from the In Re: Complex Asbestos Litigation (SFSC No. 828684) deposition of
Arthur R. Klimack

» Exhibit P — Title Page, Pages 32 and 46-55, and reporter's certificate from the Deposition
of Arthur Klimack in Klimack v. Asbestos Defendants (SFSC No, 438260)

« Exhibit Q — Excerpts from The Asbestos Worker from April 1957

* Exhibit R— Excerpts from The Asbestos Worker from October 1957

© Exhibit S — Excerpts from The Asbestos Worker from April 1958

e Exhibit T — Excerpts from The Asbestos Worker from May 1959

© Exhibit U — Excerpts from The Asbestos Worker from February 1963

« Exhibit V— Declaration of Kyle Dotson in Support of Defendant S.J. Amoroso
Construction Co., Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary

Adjudication

| DATED: February 21, 2013 BUTY & CURLIANO LLP

By

VA om 2

CE
ates for Defendant
S.J“AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.

3

EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION