arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

28 BUTY & CURLIANOLLE 555-12 Sacer MADELINE L. BUTY [SBN 157186] GEORGE 8S. SULLIVAN [SBN 187793] BUTY & CURLIANO LLP 555 — 12" Street, Suite 1280 ELECTRONICALLY Oakland, California 94607 FILED Tel: 510.267.3000 Superior Court of Califomia, Fax: 510.267.0117 County of San Francisco Email: mib@butycurliano.com FEB 22 2013 jsullivan@butycurliano.com Clerk of the Court BY: WESLEY G. RAMIREZ Attorneys for Defendant Deputy Clerk S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO — UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, No. CGC-10-275731 Plaintiffs, DECLARATION OF GEORGE S. SULLIVAN IN SUPPORT OF v. DEFENDANT S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION Date: May 9, 2013 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept; 503 C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS; et al., Defendants. Trial: June 10, 2013 ee ee i ae ee ee ee I, George S. Sullivan, declare: 1. Tam an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all of the courts of the State of California and an attorney with the law firm of Buty & Curliano LLP, attorneys of record for S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc. (“Amoroso”). 2. This declaration is made to present evidence in support of Amoroso’ s Motion for Summary Judgment or, Alternatively, Summary Adjudication. I DECLARATION OF GEORGE S. SULLIVAN EN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT S.J, AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION Co., INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION28 BUTY & CLRLIANOLLP ‘855. 12" STREET ‘Sure 1260 ‘AKLAND, CA 94807 ‘510.267.3008 3. Tam one of the attorneys responsible for handling this file and, in that capacity, have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration; except as to those matters stated on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be true. If called upon as a witness, I would and could competently testify as to the facts set forth in this declaration. 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint for Personal Injury and Loss of Consortium — Asbestos. 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the Defendants’ Standard Interrogatories to Plaintiff (Personal Injury), Set 1. 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit C are true and correct copies of plaintiffs’ Answers to Interrogatories and verifications. 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit D are true and correct copies of the Title Page, Pages 300-301, 1479, 1505-1506, 1651-1654, 1784-1810, 2928-2930, and 3021-3030, and reporter’s certificate from the deposition of Robert Ross in San Francisco Superior Court Case No. 274099. 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit E are true and correct copies of the Title Page, Pages 743-756, and 2206-2208, and reporter’s certificate from the deposition of Robert Ross in San Francisco Superior Court Case No. 275731. 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit F are true and correct copies of the Title Page, Pages 1304-1305, 1309-1311, and 1314-1315, and reporter’s certificate from the deposition of Robert Cantley in San Francisco Superior Court Case No. 274099. 10. Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc.’s Special Interrogatories to Plaintiffs, Set One. 11. Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc.’s Request for Production of Documents to Plaintiffs, Set One. 12. Attached hereto as Exhibit | is a true and correct copy of S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc.’s Request for Admissions to Plaintiffs, Set One. 13. Attached hereto as Exhibit J is a true and correct copy of S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc.’s Form Interrogatories to Plaintiffs, Set One. Mf 2 DECLARATION OF GEORGE S. SULLIVAN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY ADJUDICATIONCeo ND HW BP YW NY vv — vet RRP RR RB E BSG eR AAA SKR ES 28 BUTY ZOURLANOLLP '555- 12" Steer ‘Sure 1200, LAND. A "540.267.3000 14, Attached hereto as Exhibit K are true and correct copies of Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc.’ s Special Interrogatories, Set One and verification. 15. Attached hereto as Exhibit L are true and correct copies of Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc.’ s Request for Production of Documents, Set One and verification. 16. Attached hereto as Exhibit M are true and correct copies of Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc.’ s Requests for Admission, Set One and verification. 17. Attached hereto as Exhibit N are true and correct copies of Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc.’ s Form Interrogatories, Set One and verification. 18. Attached hereto as Exhibit O are true and correct copies of the Title Page, Pages 229-240, 524-525, 575-576, 580-581, 605-625, 633-644, 656-661, 670-674, 701-706, 716-732, 780-782, 792-794, and 994-1003, and reporter’ s certificate from the In Re: Complex Asbestos . Litigation (SFSC No. 438260) deposition of Arthur R. Klimack. 19. Attached hereto as Exhibit P are true and correct copies of the Title Page, Pages 32 and 46-55, and reporter’ s certificate from the Deposition of Arthur Klimack in Klimack y. Asbestos Defendants (SFSC No. 438260). 20. Attached hereto as Exhibit Q is a true and correct copy of excerpts from The Asbestos Worker from April 1957. 21. Attached hereto as Exhibit R is a true and correct copy of excerpts from The Asbestos Worker from October 1957. 22. Attached hereto as Exhibit S is a true and correct copy of excerpts from The Asbestos Worker from April 1958. 23. Attached hereto as Exhibit T is a true and correct copy of excerpts from The Asbestos Worker from May 1959. 24. — Attached hereto as Exhibit U is a true and correct copy of excerpts from The Asbestos Worker from February 1963. Hl 3 DECLARATION OF GEORGE S, SULLIVAN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION Co., INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY ADJUDICATIONro om OND 10 WW 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2 23 24 25 26 27 28 BUTY BCURLIANOLLP ‘555. 12" S1REET Suite 1200 ‘OAKLAND, C8 84607 25. Attached hereto as Exhibit V is a true and correct copy of the Declaration of Kyle Dotson in Support of Defendant S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment or, Alternatively, Summary Adjudication. I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws for the State of California that foregoing is true and correct. Executed on this 21st day of February 2013, at Oakland, California. Kx 2S JR George S. Sullivan 4 DECLARATION OF GEORGE S, SULLIVAN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION Co., INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION