arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

CSC wo ND TF eR Ww NH RoR NR NN NN YD BB Re Be Be oe om oR OR SRG 8 ON S&F SF Oe NA aE DH Se DS 28 BRYDON: Huo & PARKER 135 Main Sree 20 FLOOR San Francisco, CA 945 Edward R. Hugo [Bar No. 124839] P.M. Bessette (Bar No. 127588] Josette D. Johnson [Bar No. 195977] BRYDON HUGO & PARKER 135 Main Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 808-0300 Facsimile: (415) 808-0333 Email: service@bhplaw.com Attorneys for Defendant PERINI CORPORATION ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco FEB 22 2013 Clerk of the Court BY: ALISON AGBAY Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT - STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, Plaintiffs, vs. C.C. MOORE & CO, ENGINEERS, et al., Defendants. (ASBESTOS) Case No. CGC-10-275731 DECLARATION OF JOSETTE D. JOHNSON IN SUPPORT OF PERINI CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Filed Concurrently With Notice of Motion; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Separate Statement; Request for Judicial Notice; Declaration of Josette D, Johnson] Date: May 9, 2013 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept: 503 Judge: Hon. Teri L. Jackson Complaint Filed: | December 17, 2010 Trial Date: June 10, 2013 | JOSETTE D. JOHNSON, declare as follows: 1 I am an attorney licensed to practice before all the courts of the State of California and am a senior associate with the law firm of Brydon Hugo & Parker, attorneys of record for Defendant PERINI CORPORATION in the above-referenced matter. [have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein, or have gained such knowledge from my review of the records and documents maintained in our file in the regular course of business and, if called as a witness, I could and would testify competently thereto. 1 DECLARATION OF JOSETTE D. JOHNSON IN SUPPORT OF PERINI CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENTeo wm N BF Oo FO Ne ea Oo SN DH FF WN B&B D 20 Brypon HUGO & PARKER 135 MAIN STREET 20" 300K Son Feanclsco, CA 94305, 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint. 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of Perini Corporation’s Special Interrogatories to Plaintiffs (Set One). 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff's Amended Response to Defendant Perini Corporation’s Special Interrogatories, Set One. 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of pertinent portions of plaintiff Robert Ross’s transcript of deposition in the matter of Robert Ross v. Asbestos Defendants, San Francisco County Superior Court, case number 274099. 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of pertinent portions of plaintiff Robert Ross’s transcript of deposition in this action. 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of pertinent portions of the transcript of deposition of Robert Cantley taken in the matter of Robert Ross v, Asbestos Defendants, San Francisco County Superior Court, case number 274099. 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of Declaration of Howard Spielman and exhibits thereto, filed in Eugene Millard v, Associated Insulation of California, Superior Court of the County of San Francisco, case No. CGC-09-275091. 10. Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of transcript of deposition of Stephen Steele, taken in Sylvia Currier v. Asbestos Defendants, Superior Court of the County of San Francisco, case No. CGC-06-454323, dated August 21, 2009. Ii. Attached hereto as Exhibit Lis a true and correct copy of declaration of Richard Cohen filed by plaintiff in Betty Peterson, et al., v. Associated Insulation of California, et al, Superior Court of the County of San Francisco, case No. CGC~10-275498. 12. Attached hereto as Exhibit J is a true and correct copy of declaration of Richard Cohen filed by plaintiff in John Casey et al., v. Asbestos Defendants, Superior Court of the County of San Francisco, case No. CGC-10-275517. 13. Attached hereto as Exhibit K is a true and correct copy of Order granting Robertshaw Controls Company's motion for summary judgment in the matter of Eugene 2 DECLARATION OF JOSETTE D. JOHNSON IN SUPPORT OF PERINI CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENTec Om N DT BR DO Ne NNR NN DB Be Be Be Be oR BR oR oR HE oe 8S RRR BBR SF SEP R Ge BH S 28 BRYDON HUGO & PARKER 135 Mam Srmeny 20" FLOOK San Brancisee, CA 94105 Millard v, Asbestos Defendants, Superior Court of the County of San Francisco, case No. CGC-09-275091, finding that sophisticated user defense is applicable. The court's order implicitly finds that plaintiff Millard, and his union, Asbestos Workers local 16 in San Francisco, were sophisticated users of asbestos. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February 22, 2013, at San Francisco, osétte D. Johnson 3 DECLARATION OF JOSETTE D. JOHNSON IN SUPPORT OF PERINI CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR, SUMMARY JUDGMENT