arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview 
						
                                
Preview

                                Becherer
Kannett &
Schweitzer

oO eon Ona FW NY

YY Ne ee ee ew ee ei
8 fF SO wmMAKDaA AHN ES

23

Mark S. Kannett (SBN 104572) ©

Paul S. Lecky (SBN 154480)
BECHERER KANNETT & SCHWEITZER
The Water Tower @ 1255 Powell Street
Emeryville, CA 94608

Telephone: (510) 658-3600

Facsimile: (510) 658-1151

Email: plecky@bkscal.com

Attorneys for Defendant
JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.

ELECTRONICALLY
FILED

Superior Court of California,
County of San Francisco

FEB 22 2013

Clerk of the Court
BY: ALISON AGBAY
Deputy Clerk

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS
Plaintiffs,
vs.
C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS;
Defendants as Reflected on Exhibit 1 attached
to the Summary Complaint herein; and DOES
1-8500.

Defendants.

CASE NO. CGC-10-275731

DEFENDANT JOHNSON CONTROLS,
INC.’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Date: May 9, 2013

Time: 9:30 a.m.

Dept: 503 .
Judge: Hon. Terri L. Jackson
Complaint

Filed: December 17, 2010

(Filed Concurrently with Notice of Motion;
Memorandum of Points And Authorities,
Separate Statement Of Undisputed Facts,
and Declaration of Paul S. Lecky In Support
Of.

DEFENDANT JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENTee

Defendant JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. hereby requests that the Court take judicial
notice of the following documents pursuant to Evidence Code §452 (d), (g) and (h):

1. Declaration of Howard Spielman and exhibits thereto, filed in Eugene Millard v.
Associated Insulation of California, Superior Court of the County of San Francisco, case No.
CGC-09-275091. A true and correct copy of said declaration is attached as Exhibit H to the
Declaration of Paul S. Lecky’s Declaration in Support of Johnson Control, Inc.’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (“Lecky Dec.”).

2. Declaration of Richard Cohen filed by plaintiff in Betty Peterson, et al., v.

oOo man Da oO fF WY ND

Associated Insulation of California, et al., Superior Court of the County of San Francisco, case
10 || No, CGC-10-275498. A true and correct copy of said declaration is attached as Exhibit J to the
11 | Johnson Decl.

2 3. Order granting Robert Shaw Controls Company’s motion for summary judgment
3 | in the matter of Eugene Millard v. Asbestos Defendants, Superior Court of the County of San

14 | Francisco, Case No. CGC-09-275091, finding that sophisticated user defense is applicable. The

5 | court's order implicitly finds that Asbestos Workers local 16 in San Francisco, and by extension
16 | plaintiff Millard, were sophisticated users of asbestos. A true and correct copy of Order is

17 | attached as Exhibit L to the Johnson Decl.

+

8
9 | Dated: Februag 2013 BECHERER KANNETT & SCHWEITZER
20
21 (oo
By:
22 Paul S. Lecky
. Attorneys for Defendant
23 JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. *
Bech
eecharm, 24
Kennet a
25

‘510-658-3600

DEFENDANT JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENToo oO N DW HO FF YW DY =

NNN NN 8&8 @ |=@ ew ew Bw Bw Bw Be
wow nN = O90 © @©@ NN MO oo FF W NY =

24

Becherer
Kannett & 2.

5...
Schweitzer

——— 26
1255
Powell St

Emeryville, CA,
94608 27

” 810-858-3600

28

PROOF OF SERVICE

|, Sonjua R. Fisher, declare that | am employed in the County of Alameda, State of California; | am
over the age of eighteen (18) years and not a party to the within entitled action; my business address is 1255
Powell Street, Emeryville, California 94608.

On February 22, 2013, | caused to be served the foregoing:

¢ DEFENDANT JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR,
IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION;

* MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION;

¢ SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT JOHNSON
CONTROLS, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION;

» REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION;

* DECLARATION OF PAUL S. LECKY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION;

« EXHIBIT A (PART 1 of 2) TO THE DECLARATION OF PAUL S. LECKY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT JOHNSON,
CONTROLS, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION;
¢ EXHIBIT A (PART 2 of 2) TO THE DECLARATION OF PAUL S. LECKY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT JOHNSON
CONTROLS, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
«EXHIBITS B thru F TO THE DECLARATION OF PAUL S. LECKY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT JOHNSON
CONTROLS, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION;
+ EXHIBIT G (PART 4 of 3) TO THE DECLARATION OF PAUL S. LECKY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT JOHNSON
CONTROLS, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION;
+ EXHIBIT G (PART 2 of 3) TO THE DECLARATION OF PAUL S. LECKY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT JOHNSON
CONTROLS, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION;
¢ EXHIBIT G (PART 3 of 3) TO THE DECLARATION OF PAUL S. LECKY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT JOHNSON
CONTROLS, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION;
and
« EXHIBITS H thru L TO THE DECLARATION OF PAUL S. LECKY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT JOHNSON,
CONTROLS, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

In said action by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope and served in the manner and/or manners
described below to each of the parties herein and addressed as follows:

Attomeys for Plaintiff {Hand Delivery & Lexis Nexis}
David Donadio, Esq.
BRAYTON PURCELL LLP
222 Rush Landing Road, P.O. Box 6169
Novato, CA 94948-6169
Telephone: {415} 898-1555 Facsimile {415} 898-1247

[4 (By Personal-Delivery) | caused such envelope to be delivered by hand to the office of the addressee(s). {One Hour
Delivery ~ Brayton Purcell LLP} .

Bi (By Electronic Service) (via electronic filing service provider) By electronically transmitting the document(s) listed above to
LexisNexis File and Serve, an electronic filing service provider at www.fileandserve.lexisnexis.com. To my knowledge, the

transmission was reported as complete and without error. See GalR. Ct. R--2053, 2055, 2060. {To All Counsel}
I declare under penaity of perjury that the for sina nd oss a i i

~ 2013, af Emeryville, California. WY

PROOF OF SERVICE