arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

oD OM NKR OH Dennis M. Young, Esq. SBN 121178 Lauren C. Mcleod, Esq. SBN 255886 FOLEY & MANSFIELD, PLLP 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1900 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 590-9500 Facsimile: (510) 590-9595 E-mail: dvoung@foleymanstfield.com Attorneys for Defendant ACCO ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, INC. ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco FEB 25 2013 Clerk of the Court BY: ALISON AGBAY Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, Case No: CGC-10-275731 Plaintiffs, “Asbestos-Related Case” VS. PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS, et al. Date: May 9, 2013 Time: 9:30 a.m. Defendants. Dept: 503 Trial Date: June 10, 2013 Judge: Hon. Teri L. Jackson Complaint Filed: December 17, 2010 I PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSIONoD OM NKR OH PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS ys. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS, et al. San Francisco Superior Court No.: CGC-10-275731 Our File No.: 12006-000023 1, the undersigned, declare as follows: Lam employed in the County of Alameda, California, and I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action. My business address is 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1900, Oakland, California, 94612, On the date executed below, | electronically served the following document(s) via LexisNexis website described as: INDEX OF EXHIBITS [A-I] TO DECLARATION OF DENNIS M. YOUNG IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT ACCO ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT EXHIBIT “A” TO DECLARATION OF DENNIS M. YOUNG IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT ACCO ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION EXHIBIT “B” TO DECLARATION OF DENNIS M. YOUNG IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT ACCO ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION EXHIBIT “C -D” TO DECLARATION OF DENNIS M. YOUNG EN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT ACCO ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION EXHIBIT “E” TO DECLARATION OF DENNIS M. YOUNG IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT ACCO ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION EXHIBIT “F - G? TO DECLARATION OF DENNIS M. YOUNG IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT ACCO ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION EXHIBIT “H - I? TO DECLARATION OF DENNIS M. YOUNG IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT ACCO ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION [X] (By Personal Service) I caused cach such envelope to be delivered to a courier with whom we have a direct billing account, who personally delivered each such envelope to the office of the addressee on the date last written below. Brayton & Purcell 222 Rush Landing Road PO Box 6169 Novato, CA 94948-6169 2 PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSIONI declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on February 25, 2013 at Oakland, California. Rondi L. Preston 3 PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION