arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

PATRICIA G. ROSENBERG, SBN 154820 HAAS & NAJARIAN, LLP 58 Maiden Lane, Second Floor San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: 415.788.6330 JAMES N. SINUNU, SBN 62802 JUNIPER BACON, SBN 256687 SINUNU BRUNI LLP 333 Pine Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415.362.9700 Facsimile: 415.362.9707 jsinunu@sinunubruni.com jbacon@sinunubruni.com Attorneys for Defendant MCCLURE ELECTRIC, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO-UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, Plaintiffs, VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS: Defendants as Reflected on Exhibit 1 attached to the Summary Complaint herein; and DOES 1-8500. Ne ee eee Defendants. 1 ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco FEB 28 2013 Clerk of the Court BY: CAROL BALISTRERI Deputy Cle Case No.: CGC-10-275731 EXHIBIT J TO DECLARATION OF JUNIPER BACON IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT MCCLURE ELECTRIC, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION Complaint Filed: December 17, 2010 Trial Date: June 10, 2013 EXHIBIT 3 TO DECLARATION OF JUNIPER BACON IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT MCCLURE ELECTRIC, INC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION ekExhibit J: PATRICIA G. "ROSENBERG, SBN 154820 | HAAS & NAJARIAN, LLP . 1/58 Maiden Lane, Second Floor San Francisco, CA 94108: 3 Telephone: Als. 788.6330. JAMES N. SINUNU, SBN 62802. JUNIPER BACON, SBN 2 256687 Telephone: 415.362.9700 > Facsimile: 415:362.9707 jsimunu@sinunubruni.com ‘Attorneys for ce MCCLURE ELECTRIC, INC o ‘SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA : CTY AND COUNTY OF SAN. FRANCISCO-UNLIMITED JURISDICTION Case No. CGC-10.275731 : . 2S ode STIPULATION ‘TO SHORTEN. NOTICE fe PERIOD FOR MCCLURE ELECTRIC, | 0 | _INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY — a JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ): ALTERNATIVE, | SUMMARY : ADJUDICATION — od: December 1, 2010 Date “June 10, 2013 - 2 ||ROBERT ROSS and JEANROSS, cc. ‘MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS; BASS {| Defendants as Reflected on Exhibit 1. || attached to the Sunmnecy Complaint oS herein; and DOES 1-850.” : 5. Taalits Motion for Summary Judgment andlor M Motion for Summary Adjudication ona shortened : notice period of. sixty-eight (68) days rather than the Statutory ‘noticed period set forth i in : Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") section “43 7e(a).. ‘The notice period for plaintiffs opposition : is unchanged, and will be due pursuant to ccP 437¢(b\2), not less ‘than 14 days. Preceding oS : the date of hearing. Further, the notice period for. MCCLURE ELECTRICs reply to the. : opposition is unchanged, ‘and will be due Pursuant to CCP: A3TC(OKA), not less than five days : 1 preceding the date of hearing. Finally, the ‘hearing date will remain unchanged. : "Pursuant to this Stipulation, the Notice of Motion will include the following o : oe language, capitalized ‘and emboldend: “THIS MOTION. Is SERVED PURSUANT TO : : STIPULATION ALLOWING SHORTENED TIME;” and a copy. of: the Stipulation will be attached to the Notice and Motion for. Summary Judgment and/or Summary ‘Adindication. ° Dated: February ZL, 2013 Ss "SINUNU BRUNILLP 14 INUNU - IPER BACON 15 - Attorneys for Defendant ~~ MCCL' RE ELECTRIC, INC.” Dated: FebruaryS1,2013. 9 ‘BRAYTON PURCELL LLP ~ Attorn forPlaintifs ROBE! ROSS and JEAN ROSS a -. STIPULATION TO SHORTEN NOTICE PERIOD FOR MCCLURE ELECTRIC, INC:S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. : oePROOF OF SERVICE "Robert Ross vc. C Moore & Co. Engineers, etal, San Francisco County Superior Court Case No.: ccc. 10-275731 “ -Lam over the age of eighteen years and not a party tothe above-captioned matter. My business address is 333 Pine Street, Suite 400, San Francisco, California 94104-3311, where the service described below took place on the date set forth below. : Person(s) Served and Manner of Service: see Electronic Service: On the date executed below, I electronically served the ‘document(s) via LexisNexis File & Serve described below on recipients designated a on the Transaction Receipt located « on the. LexisNexis File & Serve website. : Document ment(s) Served: oe STIPULATION To SHORTEN NOTICE PERIOD FOR MCCLURE ELECTRIC, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT COR, IN THE : ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION. 1 declare under. penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of: California that the | foregoing i is trae and correct. : : Dated: February 21, 2013: 2 : ee 4 PROOF OF SERVICE