arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

Oo wm NR OH RB wD Ym DO NS BPRRe BESS SeEARaAE BH TS BENNETT, SAMUELSEN, REYNOLDS & ALLARD ALAMEDA, ‘CA 94501-1084 (Gio) 24.7888 JOHN G. COWPERTHWAITE, CSB# 96375 BENNETT, SAMUELSEN, REYNOLDS & ALLARD A Professional Corporation Attorneys at Law 1301 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 300 Alameda, California 94501-1084 Telephone: (510) 444-7688 Facsimile: (510) 444-5849 Attorneys for Defendant SLAKEY BROTHERS, INC. ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco MAR 22 2013 Clerk of the Court BY: WILLIAM TRUPEK Deputy Clerk IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, NO. CGC-10-275731 Plaintiffs, EXHIBIT E vs. Date: May 14, 2013 C.C. MOORE & CO., ENGINEERS, et al., pime: 9:30 a.m. ept.: Defendants. { Trial Date: June 10, 2013U. S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON 25, D.C. IN REPLY REFER TO (:rRtR ABE FEB 25 1363 Slakey Brothers, Inc. 1400 North C Street Sacramento, California Gentlemen: This is in reply: to a letter of July 25, 1962, in whicha ruling is requested on your behalf as to the effect, for Federal income tax purposes, of proposed transactions described herein. Reference is also made to letters dated yee 30, August 3, September 4, November 2, and November 20, 1962. . Slakey Brothers, Inc. ("Slakey Brothers") is a California corporation, organized on October 21, 1946, which owns stock of four subsidiaries, and certain other assets described herein. It has outstanding 25,000 shares of Class A common voting stock of which 12,500 shares each are owned by Roger L. Slakey and his brother William H. Slakey, It also has outstanding 25,000 shares of Class 3 nonvoting common stock owned as follows: Roger lL. Slakey and family Shares Roger L. Slakey, Sre 308 Roger Il. Slakey, dre . 936 Roger L. dr. & Zaida Slakey 1,096 Robert F. & Mercedes C. Slakey 2,032 Thomas J. & Marion Ke Slakey . 2,032 Noel J. Slakey 2,032 Dante J. & Marilyn T. Carmazzi 2,032 The Roman Catholic Bishop of Sacramento 2,032 The Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Francisco 1,047 a Gay “i90" aewa” , ANNIVERSARY 7Slakey Brothers, Inc. ~ 20 William H, Slakey and family Shares William H. Slakey Bt Michael James Slakey 1,974 Michael James Slakey as custodian for Wn. R. Slakey 399 Harriet MoCabe Slekey . 751 Paul A. Slakey 2,179 Paul A. and Margaret G. Slakey 774 Linda Louise Slakey 3,124 Albert Michael Carli, Jr. 982 Albert Michael and Diane L. Carli 181 Margaret G. Slakey . LL Adrienne Reese Harris Shs Slakey Brothers Sacramento, Inc. ("Sacramento") is a California corporation organized April 16, 1956, and is engaged in the sale and distribution at wholesale of plumbing, heating and air conditioning equipment in the Sacramento area. Tt has outstanding 29,166 shares of Class A voting common stock, of which 23,934 shares are owned by Slakey Brothers, 3,365 shares by George Biaggi, 595 shares by Robert Slakey, and 1,272 shares by Abbie M. Slakey. It also has outstanding 20,000 shares of Class B nonvoting common stock which are all owned by Slakey. Brothers, and 7,500 shares of nonvoting $10 par value preferred stock which are all owned by The Slakey Brothers, Inc., Employees Profit Sharing Trust ("Profit Sharing Trust"). Slakey Brothers San Jose, Inc. ("San Jose") is a California ‘corporation organized April 16, 1956, and is engaged in the sale and distribution at wholesale of plumbing, heating and air conditioning equipment in the San Jose area, It has outstanding 315,777 shares of Class A voting common stock, of which Slakey Brethers owns 12,464 shares and the employees of San Jose own 3,313 shares. It also has outstanding 15,000 shares of Class B nonvoting commen stock which are all owned by Slakey Brothers, and 10,000 shares of nonvoting $10 par value preferred stock which are all owned by the Profit Sharing Trust. Slakey Brothers Oakland, Inc. ("Oakland") is a California corporation organized April 16, 1956, and is engaged in the sale and distribution at wholesale of plumbing, heating, andSlakey Brothers, Inc. -3e- air conditioning equipment in the Cakland area. It has out- standing 22,551 shares of Class A voting common stock of which Slakey Srothers owns 22,034 shares and the employees of Oakland own 517 shares. -It also has outstanding 20,000 shares of Class B nonvoting common stock which are all owned by Slakey Brothers, and 8,900 shares of §10 par value preferred stock which are all owned by the Profit Sharing Trust. Slakey Brothers, Mcdesto, Inc. ("Modeste") is a California corporation organized April 16, 1956, and is engaged in the sale and distribution at wholesale of plumbing, heating and air conditioning equipment in the Modesto area. It has out~ standing 7,500 shares of Class A voting common stock and 8,422 shares of Class B nonvoting common stock which are all owned by Slakey Brothers. The Class A common stock of each subsidiary of Slakey Brothers is identical with its Class B common stock except with respect to its voting rights. Slakey Brothers formerly carried on the business of the sale and distribution at wholesale of plumbing, heating and air conditioning equipment in Northern California. Sacramento, San Jose, Modesto and Cakland were formed by Slakey Brothers on April 16, 1956, and the assets relating to the business carried on within each named area were transferred to the respective corporations in exchange for their common stock. The only other asset owned by Slakey Brothers at that time was real property which was thereafter, and remains currently, partially leased to Sacramento for use in its wholesale plumbing supply operations. Another portion of the real property is leased to Seaport Sacramento, Ince, an unrelated corporation. . With regard to all the real property owned by Slakey Brothers, the following is disclosed:Slakey Brothers, Inc.. -4e Annual Cost Less Net Fair Net In- Accumulated Market come Depreciation Value Approximate 5 years or older Parcel 3 leased to Slekey Brothers Sacramento, Inc. $107,398.14 $225,000 $24,000 Unimproved Land facing N.B. Street 8,500.00 50,000 -O- Potal $116, 398.00 $275,000 $24,000 Less than 5 years eld Improvements on property leased to Slakey Brothers Sacramento, Ince $121,687.00 $150,000 $ 7,800 Improvements on portion leased to Seaport Sacramento, Ince 107,754.18 145,000 12,30 Total $229 4h1.18 $295,000 $20,100 The balance sheet of Slakey Brothers, as of January 31, 1962, discloses total current assets of $39,552.50, total in- vestment in the common stock of the four subsidiaries of. $1,214,456.61, total fixed assets of buildings, street improvements and land of $331,211.01, and other assets of $1,666.26. It also discloses total liabilities of $253,234.41 and total capital of $1,333,651.97. On February 7, 1958, Slakey Brothers Redding, Inc. ("Redding"), a California corporation, was organized by Sacramento which transferred cash to Redding in exchange for all its common vstock. Redding then purchased a wholesale plumbing supply business in Redding, California, which it continues to operate. Sacramento owns all the outstanding stock of Redding. It is stated that the stockholders of the Class B common stock of Slakey Brothers listed above under Roger L. Slakey and family ("Roger Slakey family"), include, in addition to Roger L. Slakey, only his children and their spouses. It is also stated that the stockholders of the Class B common stock listed above under William H, Slekey and family ("William Slakey family") include, in addition to William He Slakey, only his children, their spouses, and his grandchild.Slakey Brothers, Inc. “5 Roger L. Slakey has assumed management responsibilities in Sacramento and Modesto, while William Slakey has assumed management responsibilities in Oakland and San Jose, It is stated that consumer demands and market requirements differ considerably between each area in which the sub- sidiaries operate. In addition there are basic differences in the business philosophies of the two brothers. It is believed that a division into two groups of corpo- rations will permit managers within the respective areas to participate in the profits and have a proprietary interest in the corporations located in that area, achieve -greater operating efficiency, provide more flexible in- strumentalities for the development of methods, pricing and policies best suited to lecal operating conditions, and avoid indecision resulting from a conflict im the business policies of the two brothers. Accordingly, it is proposed to take the following steps: 1. Sacramento and Modesto will each pay pro rata cash dividends to their Class A and Class B common stockholders totaling $77,684. and $60,000. respectively. 2. Sacramento, San Jose, Modesto and Oakland will each issue new shares of their Class A voting common stock in exchange for all the outstanding shares of their Class B nonvoting common stock (which are all held by Slakey Brothers) on a share for share: basise 3, Sacramento, San Jose, Modesto and Oakland will each issue new shares of $100 par value voting preferred stock in exchange for all their outstanding shares of $10 par velue nonvoting preferred stock (which are all held by the Profit Sharing Trast) on the basis of one new share of preferred stock for each ten shares of preferred stock outstanding.Slakey Lrothers, Inc. Oo" . Slakey Zrothers will transfer to Oakland all its assets (other than the common stock of tts subsidiaries) subject to its liabilities in exchange for that number of shares of the Class 4 voting common stock of Oakland which have aa aggregate par value equal to the net ook value of the assets received from Slakey Srothers. It will be assumed that the sum of the amount of the liabilities to which the assets Will be subject, plus the amount of any liabilities assumed, will not exceed the total of the adjusted basis of the assets transferred: 5, Slakey Brothers will be lisuidated and the Class A voting common stock of Sacramento and Modesto will be distributed to the Roger Slakey family and The Roman Catholic Bishop of Sacramento ("group A shareholders") on a pro rata-basis in exchange for all the Class A and Class B common stock of 3lakey Brothers held by them; end the Class A common stock of Oakland and San Jose will’ be distri- puted to the William Slakey family and the Poman Catholic Archbishop of San Francisco (“group B shareholders") in exchange for all the Class A and Class B commen stock ‘of Slakey Brothers owmed by them. Tumediately thereafter, Slakey Brothers wiil dissolve. It is stated that the management has no knowledge of any concerted plan by any of the shareholders to sell or otherwise dispose of any of the stock of the subsidiary corporations when received, and has no intention to liquidate them or dispose of substantially ell their assets following the re- organization, . Based solely on the information submitted, and the assumptions set forth above, it is held as follows:Sleakey Srothers, Inc. -2- Q) (2) The distribution by Sacramento of 377,634 and by Hodesto of $60,000, in cash, to their common stockholders, will in each instance constitute a distribution of progerty under section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. Each such distribution will constitute a taxable dividend, under section 501, to the extent of the earnings and nrofits of the corporation available for the payment of dividends within the meaning of section 516 of the Code. Under section 243, there will be allowed as a deduction to Slakey Brothers an amount equal to 85 percent of the enount of the dividends so received. (a) ‘he exchange of all the outstanding shares of Class B nonveting common stock for new shares of Class 4 voting stock and the ex- change of all the outstanding shares of $10 par value nonvoting preferred stock for new shares of 9100 par value voting preferred stock of Sacramento, San Jose, Modesto and Oakland will in each instance constitute a recapitalization and therefore a reorganization within the meaning of section 368(2)(1)(Z) of the Code, and no gain or loss will be recognized to Sacramento, San Jose, Modesto or Cakland as a result thereof. (b) In accordance with the provisions of section 554(a)(1), no gain or loss will be recog- nized to Slakey Brothers as the holder of all the outstanding Class B common stock of each corporation upon the surrender of such stock for the Class A common stock of such corporation or to the Profit Sharing Trust as the holdér of all the outstanding preferred stock of each corporation upon the surrender of such stock for the new shares of preferred stock of such corpo- ration, on the basis deserided above.Slakey Brothers, Inc. ~3- CH) (ce) () (a) The vesis of the Class A commen stock recsived, by Slakey Brothers and of the new preferred stock received by the frofit Sharing Trust will be the sane as the Federal income tax basis, as of the date of the recapitalization, of the stock exchanged therefor (section 358). : No gain or loss will be recognized to Slekey Brothers or Calsland upon the transfer by Slakey Brothers to Oakland of its assets gubdject to its liabilities, or the assumption of any of its liabilities by Oakland, solely for the Class. A common.stock of Cakland. (Sections BSL and 357.) The basis of the assets received by Oakland will be the same as the basis of those assets in the hands of Slakey Brothers immediately prior to the transaction. (Section 362.). Under section 353, the basis of the Orkland stock received by Slakey Brothers will be the same as the basis of the property trans- ferred, less the sum of the amount of the _ljabilities to which the property is subject plus the anount of any additional liabilities assumed. . In accordance with the provisions of section 355 of the Code, no gain or Loss will ve recognized to (and no amount will be includible in the income of) the group 4 shareholders of Slakey Brothers upon the receipt by them of all the outstanding stock of Sacramento” and Modesto on a pro rata basis and the group B shareholders of Slakey Brothers upon the receipt by them of all the out- standing stock of Oakland and San Jose on a pre rata basis as a distribution in ex~ caange for all their stock of Slakey Brothers.Slakey Brothers, Inc. ~Oe (b) (c) ~ (a) The basis of the shares of Sacramento, Sen Jose, Modesto and Oakland stock received by the. Slakey Brothers share~ holders will be the same as the basis of the shares of Slakey Brothers stock surrendered. (Section 358(a).) No gain or loss will be recognized to Slakey Brothers on the receipt of its stock in exchange for the stock of | Sacramento, San dose, Modeste and Oakland. As provided in section 312(i) of the Code, proper allocation with respect to the earnings and profits of Slakey Brothers - and Sacramento, San Jose, Nodesto and Oakland will be made in accordance with section 1312-10 of the Regulations. A copy of this letter should be attached to the Federal income tax return of each interested party for the taxable year in which the transactions sre consummated. Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to Mr. Henry W. Howard. Very truly yours, WA pestle irector, Tax Rulings’ Division