arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

ACOOONOO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Apr-17-2013 4:28 pm Case Number: CGC-10-275731 Filing Date: Apr-16-2013 4:25 Filed by: DANA OKAZAKI Juke Box: 001 Image: 04021690 ORDER ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS 001004021690 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.BRAYTON®PURCELL LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 222 RUSH LANDING ROAD POBOX 6169 NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6169 (415) 898-1555 Co oY AY FPF WN Lads 5144b101|- ALAN R. BRAYTON, ESQ,, 8.B. #73685 ANNE T. ACUNA, ESQ,, S.B. #245369 F BRAYTON®PURCELL LLP st I LE E Attorneys at Law nicks 222 Rush Landing Road 900 Cot, D P.O. Box 6169 . APR Novato, California 94948-6169 16 2013 (415) 898-1555 CLE Tentative Ruling Contest Email: contestasbestosTR @brayton\gw.co: Attorneys for Plaintiffs a Ca SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, ASBESTOS No, CGC-10-275731 Plaintiffs, ) VS. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER Aduran C.C. MOORE & CO, ENGINEERS; ) -SHORTENING-FHEFIME-TO-HEAR-AND Defendants as Reflected on Exhibit 1 ) —BREFPLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO ~ attached to the Summary Complaint herein; ) © COMPEL THE DEPOSITION OF and DOES 1-8500. ) DEFENDANT CAHILL CONTRACTORS, INC.’S PERSON MOST QUALIFIED AND CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS; MOTION FOR SANCTIONS ee Date: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 Time: 11:00 a.m. Dept.: 503, Hon. Teri L. Jackson Trial Date: June 10, 2013 Action Filed: December 17, 2010 This matter came on ex parte on April 16, 2013, in Room 503 of the above entitled Court, with counsel for plaintiffs and defendant appearing. Based on the papers filed herein, and upon hearing of oral argument, and for good cause Ponti kon Ie Advwne Ve Heeriny IT 1S ORDERED that PLAINTIFF: 8 MOTION TO COMPEL THE DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT CAHILL CONTRACTORS, INC.’S PERSON MOST QUALIFIED AND uf K Alnjuroctt9349\plciord ex pie OST MTC CAMILL wd 1 ATA ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER SHORFENING-FHE-FIME-LO. HEAR ADII-BRIEEODN , PLAINTIEES’ MOTION TO COMPEL THE DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT CAHILL CONTRACTORS, INC.’S PERSON MOST QUALIFIED AND CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS; MOTION FOR SANCTIONSoOo NIN DA HM BF YW NN PNM NY NY YN NKR NY EH Be ee Ee ee Be ee ow AA FB ONH fF So we I DA FF WN = CO CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS; MOTION FOR SANCTIONS is GRANTED. avveady been secwed Plaintiffs’ motion } ee e. a hearing and defendant’s opposition to said motion is due to be served and filed before 4:00 p.m. on Agu 24% , 2013. Plaintiffs’ reply brief is deemed waived. The hearing on plaintiffs’ Motion hen" 1 ee Motion for Sanctions against CAHILL VS advange dA from CONTRACTORS, INQ wilbbeheard-on 2013 at 9:00 a.m.. Dated: ~~ / G6 7 3 ec Le TERI L. JACKSON KAlnjuredts9349iptord ex pte OST MTC CAHILL wod 2 ATA ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFES’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER , PLAINTIEES' MOTION TO COMPEL THE DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANT CAHILL CONTRACTORS, INC.'S PERSON MOST QUALIFIED AND CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS; MOTION FOR SANCTIONS