arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

Civ-110 * (ATTORNEY GA PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY | number, and address): - ~ sia Bra aa A ONICALILY - ‘SRain dee FILE Superior. Court of California, Gounty of San Francisco: MAY 01 op 2 ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS _ | SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF — ~ sect appnese: 400 McAlli ter. Street Clerk ofthe Court ” PLAINTIFFPETITIONER: ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS .- DEFENDANTIRESPONDENT: C.C. MOORE & CO, ENGINEERS, et al. - REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL, | casemunper ~ CGC-10.275731 A conformed copy wil! not be returned by the clerk unless a method of return Is provided with the document. ‘This form may pot be used for dlemissal of a derivative action oF a class aotion oF of any party oF cause of action in B class action. (Cal, Rules of Court, rules 9.760 and 3.770.) 1, TO-THE CLERK: Please diemigs this action aa follows: ws 2. (1) [_] With prejugice ~ (2) [7 Without prejudice — b. (1) 3] Complaint (2) [7] Petition 2 : ce os {3)[—] Cross-complaint filed by (name): wo : . on dates @ CJ Cross-complaint filed by (name): . . oy “on (date) ©) 1 Entire action of all parties and all causes @CE) Ober toot 5 CORSE TRS Sh only, as to defeadant MCCLURE ELECTRIC, INC. only. 2 (Complete in all cases except tamity taw cases.) ‘The court LJ did TST ae nol waive cout tees and come tor party inthis case, (Ths the clerk. court foes and casts were walved, the daciaration on the back of form. Attomey or party without eS eu serpraceeere rererenrsese — 1] Detondanvespondent ross—Comp! von OL rie th ove does herby gen - wf 29] 208 Sao fon eon p eee on er swam or: EXC] arronmey [] parry wrivour arom os cocking affirmative “Attorney. without attorney Or : : 2 “aco a consent Subs Teeth seein 8) Mi CE] Plaineupetivoner = °C] Datendar/Respondont . 5 Grose-Compiainant : {To be completed by clerk) : 4 CJ Dinmissal tered as requested on (te! . : sl] Dismissal entered on (date). DS as to.only (name): Be rE. Dine ot eee as renner toning rasona ony a oO “Attomey or party wihnout atforney notiled on fae "EJ Atmoy opr wou atomey rat elite Fg pry led i prove: [a copy tobe cortormed, C—] rmare ren coorens copy . : oo ES ee * : Tren vo oucatets ee OE, SS BRIS ee eo ~ PO Coena ol Cait oS Bee REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL - Me Ger, Geo, 5 we Oo 8 fn on 3 2 CE ae LEB, Lee ont Calo et Col Form ‘MAILING ADDRESS: ory wor cove: San Francisco 94102 - . BY AUCITH ae Bu Clerk». “BRANCH NAME:S1V-110 [TRLANTIFFIPETITIONER: ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS, et al. CGC-10-275731 “COURT'S RECOVERY OF WAIVED COURT FEES AND.COSTS {fa party whose court fees and costs were initially waived has recovered or will recover $10,000 or. more in value by way of settlement, compromise, arbitration award, mediation settlement, or other cmeans, the court has a statutory lien on that recovery. ‘The court may refuse to diemies the caxe until . wetene sateen (Cow. Code, § 80687) ‘Declaration , Concsmning Waived | Gourt Foes 1. The cour waived cout fees and coats inthis action fr (name: 2 ‘The person named in item 1 is (check one below): 2, [] “net recovering anything of value by this action. b. [<2] - recovering tess than $10,000 in value by this action. : ¢. [7], -recavering $10,000 or more in value by this action. ittem 2s checked, tem $ must be completed.) 3. [1 Aleour tees and court costa tat were waive inthis action have been nid tothe cout check ana): C1 Yes oe ote ur ponat psy utr aw of he Sat of Catone ane hormatn shoe an ore Type on Paint Name oF [7] aTTorney [] PARTY MAKING DECLARATION) : te {SIGNATURE) ONAN Rar, January 1.2018) O90 REQUEST. FOR DISMISSAL mae Pemzeta . . os > Se ep es So te toad Clots el ol PePROOF OF SERVICE | Robert Ross v. C.C. Moore & Co. Engineers, et al. San Francisco County Superior Court Case No.: CGC-10-275731 Tam over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the above-captioned matter. My business address i is 333 Pine Street, Suite 400, San Francisco, California 94104-3311, where the service described below took place on the date set forth below. P 3 er. of. = Electronic Service: On the date executed below, I electronically served the ~ document(s) via LexisNexis File & Serve described below on recipients designated on the Transaction Receipt located on the LexisNexis File & Serve website. © Document(s) Served: REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. : Dated: May 1,2013 eye "PROOF OF SERVICE