arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview 
						
                                
Preview

                                CIV-120

ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and aderess): FOR GOURT USE ONLY
[- Mary Margaret Ryan 127828
BISHOP | BARRY | DRATH

2000 Powell Street, Ste. 1425

Emeryville, CA 94608 ELECTRONICALLY
tetepHonewo. (510) 596-0888 raxno: (510) 596-0899
EMAL avoress: Mryan@bishop-barry.com FILED
ATTORNEY FOR (Name: Foley Electric, Ine. Superior Court of California,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF San Francisco County of San Francisco
strestappress: 400 McAllister Street MAY 06 2013
MAILING ADDRESS: Clerk of the Court
cnvanozecoos San Francisco, CA 94102-4514 BY: MAURA RAMIREZ
SRANCH NAME: Asbestos Deputy Clerk

PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Robert and Jean Ross
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: C.C, Moore & Co. Engineers, et al.

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF DISMISSAL AND PROOF OF SERVICE CGC 10-275731
(&) Personal Injury, Property Damage, or Wrongful Death

[2] Motor Vehicle (XJ Other
C) Family Law
(J Eminent Domain
Other (specify):
TO ATTORNEYS AND PARTIES WITHOUT ATTORNEYS: A dismissal was entered in this action by the clerk as shown on the
Request for Dismissal, (Attach a copy completed by the clerk.)
Date-May 6, 2013

qrvecorprintNameor [J artorney [oJ party wruour attorney) «sicnafure)

PROOF OF SERVICE
1. Jam over the age of 18 and not a party to this cause. My residence or business address is:
2000 Powell Street, Suite 1425, Emeryville, Ca. 94608
2, (2) Lam a resident of or employed in the county where the mailing occurred. | served a copy of the Notice of Entry of

Dismissal and Request for Dismissal by mailing them, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, as follows:

a. (2) | deposited the envelope with the United States Postal Service.

b. [LI placed the envelope for collection and processing for mailing following this business's ordinary practice with
which | am readily familiar. On the same day correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited
in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service.

c. Date of deposit: d. Place of deposit (city and state):

e. Addressed as follows (name and address):

3. CL] I served a copy of the Notice of Entry of Dismissal and Request for Dismissal by personally delivering copies as shown below:
a, Name of person served:
b. Address at which person served:
c. Qn (date): d. At (time):
4, [KX] I served a copy of the Notice of Entry of Dismissal and Request for Dismissal by electronically serving copies as shown below
(complete if electronic service is used based on a court order or agreement of the parties):
a. Name ofpersonserved:Al1 parties listed on Lexis Nexis Service
b. Electronic service address of person served:
c. On (date): May 6, 2013 d. At (time)? 4:00 p.m.
e, Electronic service address from which | served the documents: Lexis Nexis
() Proof of electronic service is attached.
5. CO] Proof of service on additional parties is attached.
| declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that,th
Date:May 6, 2013

Martha EU. Ramirez >

(TYP OR PRINT NAME)

regoing is true al

(SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT) Page 4 of 1

fopted for Mandal

es {nol Ceuroi of Calta” NOTICE OF ENTRY OF DISMISSAL

20 a danuacy 2012) Maninveons
ESSENTIAL FOS AND PROOF OF SERVI

1, Rules of Court, tule 3.1380
wow.Courts.ca.gov

280-10444

Code oF Givi Pracesure @ S81 at seq.CIV-110

Alan R. Bi Brayton, Esq Bar arf #13688) oes FOR COURT USE ONLY
Pe Ras BL ‘ia d CA 94948
LES ance G8 BOTA 8 en ELECTRONICALLY
EA4AIL ADDRESS (Cpuanel
;rvoweon pus Plaintiffs, ROBERT-ROSS and JEAN Ross ou F I L ED
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, CouNTY oF San Francisco penior Court of California,
nner woonesa 400 MeA lister Street | County of San Francisco
Wwaluna ADDRESS APR 29 2013
civ ano apcope: San Francisco 94102 Clerk of the Court
BRANCH NAMES = It BY: VANESSA WU
fn NN |
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS Deputy Clerl

DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: C.C, MOORE & CO, ENGINEERS, et al.
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL

CASE NUMBER:

. CGC-10-275731
A conformed copy will not be returned by the clerk unless a method of return Is provided with the document,

This form may not be used for dismissal of a derivative action or a class action or of any party or cause of action ina
class action, (Gal. Rules of Court, rules 3.760 and 3.770.)

4. TO THE CLERK: Please dismiss this action as follows:
a. (1) [77] With prejudice (2) [3X7] without prejudice

b. (1) [XC] Complaint (2) [57] Petition
(3) =] Cross-complaint tiled by (name): on (date):
(4) J Cross-complaint filed by (name): on (date):
(5) (J Entire action of alt i partiog and all causes of action
(8) [30] Other (specityy* AS to defendant FOLEY ELECTRIC CO. only, with a mutual waiver of costs.

2. (Complete in all cases except family law cases.)
‘The court did [x_] did not walve court fees and costs for a party In this case, (This info
the clerk, If court fees and costs were waived, the declaration on the back of this fn)
Date: April 26, 2013

pation may be obtained from

for Alan R, Braytort

PARTY WITHOUT | cTORNEN) f | SIGNATURE)
{W sieminglroquosted is of spselied panes only of chain Altorney or party without atterney for:
beat sod een conn aay miseeet aaa “Bette ari X] Plaintit/Petitionsr Defendant(Respondent
L__j Cross~Complainant .
9. TO THE GLERK: Consent to ihe above dismissal is hereby given."
Date: >

CTYPE GR PRINT Ramet OF |X | ATTORNEY ~] PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY) (SIGHATURE)
“ i @cmsecomplant or af ras {Fara Law Law) ooking, at affirmative Attorney or party without altomey for

Sgn consort toques by Gade ot Gu Brosones soclon SET Gh Plaintit/Petitioner DetendantRespondent

or. [J] Cross~Compiainant
(To be completed by clerk)

4, [T7] Dismissal entered as requested on (date):

5 [7] Dismissal entered on (date):
6.

as to only (name):
Dismissal not entered as raquested for the following reasons (specify):

7. a. C2] Attomey ar party without attomey notified on (date
b. [2] Attomey or party without attorney not natified, Filing party failed to provide

(Ta copy to be conformed means to return conformed copy
Date: Clerk, by , Deputy
Faget tote
rorgul Caneot Calera REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL.- oy. Coe § ems ea an Sa ae

(GWV- 110 {Rev. Jan. 1, 2019]

LexisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council F Forms.BISHOP | BARRY | DRATH
2000 Powell StREET Suite 1425

EMERYVILLE, CALIFORNIA 94506
TELEPHONE: (510) 596-0888 FacsmiLe: (510) 596-0899

Oo © WD DB HA RF WB PH

Rome a a ee ks
Ss 2c fe YW A HU PB YW HP SK Ss

Ross, Robert and Jean v, C.C. Moore & Co. Engineers, et al.
San Francisco Superior Court Case No, CGC-10-275731
PROOF OF SERVICE BY LEXIS NEXIS

I, the undersigned, certify that I am employed in the County of Alameda, State of
California, that I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action. My
business address is BisHop | BARRY | DRATH, 2000 Powell Street, Suite 1425, Emeryville,
California 94608. My electronic address is mramirez@bishop-barry.com.

On the date below written I served the following document(s):

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF DISMISSAL AND PROOF OF SERVICE
by transmitting a true copy to:
*** All Counsel on Lexis Nexis Service List***
in the following manner:

By uploading a true copy(ies) thereof with service and/or notification pursuant to the
service list as maintained by the CourtLink eFile system:

(X) (By LEXIS/NEXIS File & Serve, fka CourtLink eFile)) | caused such document to be
electronically uploaded into the LexisNexis File & Serve system
(http://www. lexisnexis.com/courtlink/) pursuant to Court Order on the date listed below.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

This declaration was executed on May 6, 2013, 9

1
PROOF OF SERVICE