arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

OA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet May-08-2013 2:31 pm Case Number: CGC-10-275731 Filing Date: May-08-2013 2:30 Filed by: JHULIE ROQUE Juke Box: 001 Image: 04047859 ORDER ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS 001C04047859 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.BUTY & CURLIANO LLP. 558-12" Stree ‘Sule 1280 ‘OAKLAND, GA 84607 '510.287.2000 JASON J. CURLIANO [SBN 167509] GEORGE 8. SULLIVAN [SBN 187793] BUTY & CURLIANO LLP I 555 — 12" Street, Suite 1280 S Frant . ; Oakland, California 94607 nelsco County Suparlar Court Tel: 510.267.3000 MAY 08 2019 Fax: 510.267.0117 Email: jasonc@b liano.com ‘ Helv acbedions com Be TAK OFT E COURT Deputy Clerk Attorneys for Defendant HAROLD BEASLEY PLUMBING & HEATING, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO — UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, No. CGC-10-275731 Plaintiffs, v. C.C, MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS; et al., SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. Ne ee ee eee Defendant HAROLD BEASLEY PLUMBING & HEATING, INC.’s Motion for Summary Judgment came on for hearing on May 8, 2013 in Department 503 of the above-entitled court before The Honorable Teri L. Jackson. Counsel for plaintiffs and defendant HAROLD BEASLEY PLUMBING & HEATING, INC. appeared. After full consideration of the papers filed in support and in opposition to this motion for summary judgment, and oral argument, the Court adopts its tentative ruling and hereby orders: 1 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT HAROLD BEASLEY PLUMBING & HEATING, INC.’S MOTION FOR ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT HAROLD BEASLEY PLUMBING & HEATING, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT2 2 IN DH WwW &F WwW Ye N YP YM Bw N NR NY DB we eee Re as SI BH MW FF BH = So we AA wa BB BNH BS BUTY & CURLIANOLLP 555-12" Steer ‘Suiie 1280 ‘OAKLAND, GA 94607 '830.287-3000 oo Defendant sustained its initial burden. Plaintiffs failed to submit evidence creating a triable issue whether defendant owed a duty to plaintiff, a non-employee. Specifically, plaintiffs failed to submit evidence creating a triable issue whether defendant knew or should have known that the products or materials to which it exposed Mr. Ross contained asbestos. Even accepting plaintiffs’ argument that the duty was created pursuant to the 1955 General Industry Safety Orders (GISOs), plaintiffs failed to submit evidence creating a triable issue whether defendant knew or should have known that the products or materials allegedly disturbed and/or used by defendant’s employees in Mr. Ross’ presence, who was a non-employee, were hazardous (i.e. asbestos) and exceeded the dust count acceptable under the 1955 GISOs. Defendant’s objections to Dr. Cohen’s declaration are sustained. IT IS SO ORDERED a patep: 4 g | 0 E TERI L.A udge of the Superior Court 2 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT HAROLD BEASLEY PLUMBING & HEATING, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT