arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

MOAT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet May-15-2013 3:06 pm Case Number: CGC-10-275731 Filing Date: May-15-2013 3:04 Filed by: DANA OKAZAKI Juke Box: 001 Image: 04057309 ORDER ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS 001004057309 Instructions: : Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.Cm YN KH HW BF WN = @ BBR ES ATYORNEYS AT LAW 222 RUSH LANDING ROAD POBOX 6169 NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6169 (415) 898-1559, BRAYTON®PURCELL LLP N N'ON NY ee Hoe Ww N = S © we Ya nN B Nb NY NY CWA A ALAN R, BRAYTON, ESQ., S.B. #73685 DAVID R. DONADIO, ESQ., S.B, #154436 OREN P. NOAH, ESQ., 8.B. #136310 F L ASHLEY J, BENSON, ESQ., 8.B. #276326 San Franciseo con BRAYTON*PURCELL LLP nly Superior Cours Attorneys at Law 222 Rush Landing Road P.O. Box 6169 Novato, California 94948-6169 (415) 898-1555 Attorneys for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, Plaintiffs, ASBESTOS No. CGC-10-275731 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT ROUNTREE PLUMBING & HEATING INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION vs. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS; Defendants as Reflected on Exhibit 1 attached to the Summary Complaint herein; and DOES 1-8500. ee Date: May 15, 2013 Time: 9:45 a.m. Dept: 503, Hon. Teri L. Jackson Trial Date: June 10, 2013 Action Filed: December 17, 2010 Defendant ROUNTREE PLUMBING & HEATING INC.’s Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication, came on regularly for hearing on May 15, 2013, in Department 503, of the above-captioned Court. Plaintiffs and defendant, ROUNTREE PLUMBING & HEATING INC., appeared by their counsel of record. Having considered all papers and evidence submitted, and inferences reasonably deducible therefrom, the Court determines that defendant ROUNTREE PLUMBING & it Mit Hi K Sljyred\}934%pldlod-RNTPL Usha 1 AB ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT ROUNTREE PLUMBING & HEATING INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION= NON NY NY NN NN Ye oe ew ee ee ee : : Satan MF YN FP STO eA DA PR HN BF Gow aA AH BR wD HEATING INC.’s Motion for Summary Judgmentis denied and its alternate Motion for Summary Adjudication of plaintiffs’ strict liability cause of action is off calendar. Defendant failed to sustain its burden of demonstrating that the sophisticated user defense applies to bar plaintiffs' claims against it. Plaintiffs have dismissed their strict liability cause of action. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant ROUNTREE PLUMBING & HEATING INC.’s Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication, is DENIED. (iki 1or Court: . TERI L. JACKSON KAdnjured\19340\pld\oyd- RNTPLU ani 2 AIB ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT ROUNTREE PLUMBING & HEATING INC."S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION