arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

MO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet May-28-2013 3:15 pm Case Number: CGC-10-275731 Filing Date: May-29-2013 2:30 Filed by: DANA OKAZAKI Juke Box: 001 . Image: 04072552 ORDER ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS 001004072552 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.wo en DH HM FF YB YN DB Se ee me ee Be eB SG Cwm AN A WwW RW NY = 8 Edward R. Hugo [Bar No. 124839} P. M. Bessette [Bar No. 127588] m7 Josette D, Johnson [Bar No. 1959 ns s BRYDON HUGO & PARKER F i L ED 135 Main Street, 20% Floor San Francises Gounty Superior Court San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 808-0300 . MAY 29 2013 Facsimile: (415) 808-0333 il: ice@ 2 . Email: service@bhplaw.com CLER) THE COURT Attorneys for Defendant BY: . SWINERTON BUILDERS; feputy Clark: A. TEICHERT & SON, INC.; ROUNTREE PLUMBING & HEATING, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO—UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, [Asbestos] Case No: CGC-10-275731 Plaintiffs, ve fprepened ORDER GRANTING vs. EFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS, et al., ALLOWING DEFENDANTS TO AUGMENT THEIR EXPERT WITNESS Defendants. DISCLOSURES Date: May 29, 2013 Time: 11:00 a.m. Dept.: 503 Judge: Hon. Teri L. Jackson Action Filed: December 17, 2010 Trial Date: June 10, 2013 WHEREAS, the ex parte application of defendants SWINERTON BUILDERS, A. TEICHERT & SON, INC., and ROUNTREE PLUMBING & HEATING, INC. for an granting leave to augment their expert ange isclosures in this matter was made before this Court at 11:30 a.m. on May 28, 2013, in Department 503. Brydon Hugo he Appeavaiue | Parker appearing as attorneys for the moving party andl wattorneys-for-Plaintiffs. After full consideration of the evidence and the authorities and briefs submitted, as well as counsel's oral argument, this court finds as follows: 1 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER ALLOWING DEFENDANTS TO AUGMENT THEIR EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURESwo oe NDA A FF WY wR RY YR NR YD SF Be Pe ee Se Pe Se Se 5s So aa a & OB Se F&F SF © wm NDA UH FW NH &- OD on™, om Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. Defendants SWINERTON BUILDERS, A. TEICHERT & SON, INC., and ROUNTREE PLUMBING & HEATING, INC. have shown good cause to augment their expert witness disclosures in this matter. The Court further orders that the Supplemental Designation Of Expert Witnesses And Attorney Declaration In Support Thereof served by defendants SWINERTON BUILDERS, A. TEICHERT & SON, INC., and ROUNTREE PLUMBING & HEATING, INC. on May 10, 2013 shall be deemed the augmented disclosures pursuant to this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: q\oa\\2 A peer dge of the Superior Court 4 TERI L. JACKSON 2 [proposed ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER ‘ALLOWING DEFENDANTS TO AUGMENT THEIR EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES