arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

OUI SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet May-31-2013 10:21 am Case Number: CGC-10-275731 Filing Date: May-30-2013 10:19 Filed by: DANA OKAZAKI Juke Box: 001 Image: 04074933 ORDER ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS 001004074933 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.28 BUTY 2 CURLIANOLLP 585-12" StReET ™~ + MADELINE L, BUTY [SBN 157186] GEORGE 8S, SULLIVAN [SBN 187793] F J Bas 2 Since Suite 1280 San Francisco County Superior Court Oakland, California 94607 / MAY.3 0 7013 Tel: 510.267.3000 Fax: 510.267.0117 { Email: mlb@butycurliano.com CLER) HE COURT jsullivan@butycurliano.com BY: Deputy Clerk Attomeys for Defendant S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO — UNLIMITED JURISDICTION No, CGC-10-275731 DEFENDANT S.J, AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC’S PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, Plaintiffs, v. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS; et al., Date: May 30, 2013 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept: 503 Defendants. Trial: June 10, 2013 Ne ee ee . Defendant S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.’s Motion for Summary Judgment came on for hearing on May 30, 2013 in Department 503 of the above-entitled court before The Honorable Teri L. Jackson. Counsel for plaintiffs and defendant S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. appeared. After full consideration of the papers filed in support and in opposition to this motion for summary judgment, and oral argument, the Court adopts its tentative ruling and hereby orders as follows: DEFENDANT S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.’"S PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ~Coe ID 28 mrygeunuene Sure 1280 OAKLAND, Ga 94807 510.287.3000 —™~ Defendant S.J. AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.’s motion for summary judgment is granted. Defendant sustained its initial burden, Plaintiffs failed to submit evidence creating a triable issue whether defendant breached a duty owed to Mr. Ross, a non-employee. Specifically, plaintiffs failed to submit evidence creating a triable issue whether defendant knew or should have known that the products or materials to which it exposed Mr. Ross contained asbestos. Even accepting plaintiffs’ argument that the duty was created pursuant to the 1955 General Industry Safety Orders (GISOs), plaintiffs failed to submit evidence creating a triable issue whether defendant knew or should have known that the products or materials allegedly disturbed and/or used by defendant’s employees in Mr. Ross’ presence, who was a non-employee, were hazardous (i.e. asbestos) and exceeded the dust count acceptable under the 1955 GISOs. Defendant’s objections to Dr. Cohen’s declaration are sustained, Plaintiffs have dismissed their strict liability cause of action. | IT IS SO ORDERED we 50> abe h Qe Judge of the Superior Court 2 DEFENDANT S.J, AMOROSO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC SPROPOSED ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT