arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

|| PATRICIA G. ROSENBERG, SBN 154820 SASS SO or HAAS & NAJARIAN, LLP. SoM ELECTRONICALLY. ~ ~.5'|]58 Maiden Lane, Second Floor oe : 2 San Francisco, CA 94108. TNS oe oe FT LDED. 3° Telephone: 415.788.6330 |. ws NS 2 SS «Superior Court of Calorie 4 | JAMES N. SINUNU, SBN 62802 JUN04 2013 || JUNIPER BACON, SBN 256687 os oo Clerk of the Court] 5 |) SINUNU BRUNI LLP. Cena a Br VANES Wi AS || 333 Pine Street, Suite 400. wes ses ~ 6 -|) San Francisco, CA 94104-3311 > 4 Telephone: 415.362.9700 | --/: | Facsimile: 415.362.9707... g ||ijsinunu@sinunubruni.com oy sbacon@sinunubruni.c com “9 - ~ || Attorneys for Defendant. 10: | MCCLURE ELECTRIC, INC. 1 a 49 "SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA B CITY AND COUNTY.OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION S14 es Ss TED 15. || ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, Case No.: CGC-10-275731 o Plaintifis, © ~~) “DEFENDANT MCCLURE ELECTRIC, -. lve. SES ..) INC’S MOTION IN LIMINE FOR 18 || -.-) -PRODUCTION OF VERIFIED — SET eo np ASS Ss ~.). RESPONSES TO ALL OTHER ~19-|1C.c. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS; 3 DEFENDANTS’ DISCOVERY “99 || Defendants as Reflected on Exhibit] REQUESTS, ~~ 1! Attached to the Surnmary Complaint Sy IMIL NO, - 2 | Beret on DOES 11600. 2 Date: June 3, 2013. . oS ee Defendants. : \- SSeS 23 DES —} Iudge: Hon. Teri L. Jackson = BS 24 : 8 "Complaint Filed: December 17,2010. RE a8 Trial Date: June 10, 2013. PEs 25 : 27 oe Defendant MCCLURE ELECTRIC, INC. (Defendant, bron oil and selon of a jury, : fos i . 2B herein moves this Court for an order r compelling Paitift to produce all his responses to Specially = : ~ DEFENDANT ‘MCCLURE ELECTRIC INC. °§ MOTION iN Y LIMINE EFOR PRODUCTION OF VERIFIED : RESPONSES TO. ALL ‘OTHER DEFENDANT! Ss) DISCOVERY REQUESTS oa NO. a_ NOON A ap et DON WOR RON ON ON Sm ee a SQ ALAR BR SS Soe RQ AAR BN AS Prepared Interrogatories, Judicial Council Interrogatores, Requests for Production of Documents, and Requests for Admissions served 0 on him mby defendants i in this matter. . sO : i ARGUMENT . Defendant moves this Court for an order compelling Plaintiff to produce his responses to” diocovery propounded by ail other defendants i in this case. - : Sone California Code of Civil Procedure sections 2030. 260(c), 2031 260(a) and 2033. 25048) provide in pertinent part that the ‘Party to. whom the discovery i is propounded shall also serve a copy ofthe ~ response on all other parties who have appeared i in the action, unless the court on motion with or without notice has relieved that party. from. this requirement on, its determination that service on all. other parties would be unduly expensive or. burdensome. : . : : Defendant i is entitled to produce, as evidence. at trial, Plaintiff's allegations regarding exposure - caused by other deferidants. Such evidence i is relevant under Evidence Code sections 350, 351, and 210 as it tends to prove or disprove disputed facts relative to Defendant's liability and the i issue of damages, pursuant to Civil Code section 1431 2, that are of consequence 10 the: determination of this < | action. Further, as set forth ‘above, Code of. Civil Procedure sections 2030. 260, 2031 260 and 30534 250 require Plaintiff to produce such responses without the necessity of a motion to compel To . Defendant's knowledes, the ¢ court has not relieved Plaintiff of. this obligation. MW MI ML Mo Me WH i WM | A SS : “DEFENDANT MCCLURE ELECTRIC, INC. °S MOTION IN LIMINE FOR PRODUCTION OF VERIFIED SS * RESPONSES TO. ALL OTHER DEFENDANTS’ DISCOVERY. REQUESTS (MIL NO. aL =—_ Ti CONCLUSION ~The Code of Civil Procedure requires Plaintiff tc to serve his ‘discovery 1 responses on all parties. who have appeared i in the action, absent relief by the court. Accordingly, Defendant respectfully moves for an order compelling Plaintift to produce such discovery responses served on all defendants a appearing in this. case. : 2 : : Respesflly submited, a DATED: ee” SINUNU BRUNILLP PO ON AAR 8, ES N. SINUNU > -. JUNIPER BACON - ~ Attorneys for Defendant - MCCLURE ELECTRIC, I INC. o a SA BRN oe — a ON ON Ms OBOE 8S Soe a bh o Noon ae NON SOK ge Oo, = DEFENDANT MCCLURE ELECTRIC, INC: 2S. MOTION IN LIMINE FOR PRODUCT JON OF VERIFIED: 2 RESPONSES. TO. ALL OTHER DEFENDANTS" DISCOVERY REQUESTS (iL NO. ah