arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview 
						
                                
Preview

                                OO a Ro

OO R NON ee a e e
AOR OB IN RS Ow NA AOR GN

NS
eo

~
o

'|[ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS,

“|| Attached to the Summary Complaint :

Ne
of

PATRICIA G. ROSENBERG, SEN. 154820
HAAS & NAJARIAN, LLP.

58 Maiden Lane, Second Floor,

San Francisco, CA 94108 ~

Telephone: 41s. 788. 6330

JAMES N. SINUNU, SBN. 62802
JUNIPER BACON, SBN 256687
SINUNU.BRUNI LLP.

333 Pine Street, Suite 400... -
San Francisco, CA 94104-3311 .

‘|| Telephone: 415.362.9700
i Facsimile: 415.362.9707 |

jsinunu@sinunubruni. com :
Jbacon@sinunubruni.« com.)

Attorneys for Defendant :
MCCLURE ELECTRIC, INC. _

: SUPERIOR courT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
-cITy AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO-UNLIMITED JURISDICTION oe

“2 Plaintifis,

vs. : : :
C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS;

Defendants as : Reflected on Exhibit 1

Herein and DOES. 1- 18500.”

"Defendants -

: Defendant MCCLURE ELECTRIC, INC. moves this Cour fora an order in lim ine that

—INC.’S MOTION IN LIMINE FOR

Sudge: ‘Hon. Teri L. Jackson. Se a

ELECTRONICALLY
FILED.

Superior Court of Californie
County of San Francisco:

~- JUN 04 2013.
«Clerk of the Court
BY: VANESSA Wu >:

. Deputy Cl

: maciowem oe

DEFENDANT MCCLURE. ELECTRIC,

FORTY-EIGHT HOUR PRE-.
DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS AND
WITNESSES PRIOR TO.)
PRESENTATION AT. TRIAL

(MIL N NO. etl:

Date: ‘June 3; 2013

Complaint Filed: December 7 2010.
Trial al Date: June 10, 2013. EN :

1

DEFENDANT MCCLURE BLECT RIC. INC, ?S.MOTION N LIMINE FOR: FORTY HIGHT HOUR PRE-»
DISCLOSURE OF: ‘DOCUMENTS AND. WITNESSES PRIOR TO PRESENTATION AT TRIAL Loe
. a MILNO. 4 : = LoS~

fa ek ea ge
Se NAH Pw Ne! Oo

Ow ee oN mA MN fb Ww

1. Each party is to advise all other parties, at least forty-eight (48) hours in advance of

-|{ each witness that the party will call at trial;

2... Each party is to designate documents at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to seeking to
admit the documents into evidence or to elicit testimony from a witness concerning the document; and

3. No document or documents may be specifically referred to, or quoted, by any attorney
until the opposing side has had the opportunity to request a hearing on the issue of ‘admissibility of
such. document or documents, out of the presence of the jury, :

: The above orders will allow the parties to adequately prepare for trial. There are thousands of
documents and hundreds of potential witnesses available to all parties. Many documents and some :
testimony should be excluded, and disputed evidence should not be referred to in the presence of the
jury until the court has issued a ruling. Equal application of the orders requested would i insure a faster
trial and would avoid undue prejudice. .
= Respectfully submitted,

DATED: June 3, 2013 : ~ - SINUNU BRUNI LLP

s<-"JAMES N. SINUNU ©
. JUNIPER BACON
Attomeys for Defendant
MCCLURE ELECTRIC, INC.

2.

DEFENDANT MCCLURE ELECTRIC, INC.’S MOTION IN LIMINE FOR FORTY-EIGHT HOUR PRE. >
DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS AND WITNESSES PRIOR TO PRESENTATION AT TRIAL
[MIL NO. ot} o