arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

ioe Ope An wo ee a a ee 20. || Herein; and DOES 1-18500.. . PATRICIA G. ROSENBERG, SBN 154820 : HAAS & NAJARIAN, LLP. . ‘|| 58 Maiden Lane, Second Floor San Francisco, CA 94108: 20° Telephone: 415.788.6330 a JAMES N. SINUNU, SBN 62802 JUNIPER BACON, SBN 256687 -{] SINUNU BRUNI LLP 333 Pine Street, Suite 400 - _|| San Francisco, CA 94104-3311 4) Telephone:. 415.362.9700. Facsimile: 415.362.9707 jsinunu@sinunubruni.com - jbacon@sinunubruni.com || Attomeys for Defendant |[MccLURE ERTUG INC. Ss SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA : - oo “carry. AND ) COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO-UNLIMITED JURISDICTION. ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, _ Plaintiffs, C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS; Defendants as Reflected on Exhibit-1 = Attached to the Summary Complain - — ‘Defendants ELECTRONICALLY “FILED: : Superior Court of Cato, i County of San Francisco JUN 04-2013 Clerk of the Court “BY: WANESSA WU. . Deputy Clerk} Case, No.: CGC. 10-275731 pear mceLuan nunemie. INC.’S INDEX TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE .. Date: June 3, 2013 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept: 503. : Judge: ‘Hon, Teri L. Jackson Complaint Filed: December 17, 2010 Trial Date: June 10, 2013 Defendant MCCLURE ELECTRIC, INC. , herinater MCCLURE”) has filed or will file the motions in imi OF other pleadings set forth below. MCCLURE reserves, the height to supplement its a “DEFENDANT MCCLURE ELECTRIC INC: INDEX TO MOTIONS IN LIMINEO68 LN wot i ee BoM a DIN SS _ o 20 a Index of Motions i in. Limine with additional motions i in limine a as needed. “MCCLURE also reserves sthe right to file Appropriate trial briefs, “MOTIONS IN LIMINE FORTY: FIGHT HOUR PRE-DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS AND WITNESSES PRIOR TO PRESENTATION AT TRIAL oe 2. EXCLUDE WITNESSES FROM THE COURTROOM EXCEPT FOR 3. PRODUCTION OF VERIFIED RESPONSES TO.ALL OTHER | DEFENDANTS’ DISCOVERY REQUESTS ~ 4. EVIDENCE OF SIMILAR PENDING ACTIONS - 5. JOIN IN MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND OPPOSITIONS TO wn : PLAINTIFFS MOTIONS IN LIMINE FILED BY: co. DEFENDANTS _ ~ | Granted: 6, SUBMIT. A. “JURY QUESTIONNAIRE Te ‘O0.THE JURY VENIRE. ~ | Denied: .- (BEFORE VOIR DIRE.33 : 1 Withdrawn: : . Reserved: “| Granted: Tee PRECLUDE MENTION OF BANKRUPTCY OR OTHER. ~ 1 Denied: FINANCIAL STATUS OF ABSENT TDEFENDANTS.. os | Withdrawn: - 8. “PRECLUDE EVIDENCE OF DUST LEVELS BASED ON VISUAL Denied: OBSERVATIONS . : i 9. SE eeET eral eer Ss 10. PRECLUDE DR. SCHWARTZ FROM TESTIFYING ABOUT ‘CONNECTION BETWEEN COLON CANCER AND ASBESTOS. Pe ~~ DEFENDANT MCCLURE ELECTRIC, INC’S INDEX TO MOTIONS INLIMINE- NUNN UN NR OR NR RQ a a BO RN A We wo Respectfully submitted, DATED: June 3, 2013 SINUNU BRUNI LLP . JAMES N. SINUNU JUNIPER BACON Attorneys for Defendant MCCLURE ELECTRIC, INC. — 3 ~~" DEFENDANT MCCLURE ELECTRIC, INC’S INDEX TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE.