arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

HAKE LAW, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION CO ODA HR BR WwW NY YW RR NM RW NR NB RY Re Be eR Be Oe Be ee ee SG DA WH & WY NY KF SG 6G ee BDA HW FB Bw NY KK William M. Hake, Esq. (State Bar No. 110956) Melissa D. Ippolito, Esq. (State Bar No. 239811) Kathryn L. Hoff, Esq. (State Bar No. 260420) HAKE LAW, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 655 Montgomery Street, Suite 1000 San Francisco, CA 9411] Tel: 415-926-5800 Fax: 415-926-5801 bill@hakelaw.com ELECTRONICALLY FILE Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco JUL 03 201 Clerk of the Court BY: VANESSA WU Deputy Clerk melissa@hakelaw.com lucy@hakelaw.com Attorneys for Defendant COLLINS ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ROBERT ROSS AND JEAN ROSS, Case No.: CGC-10-275731 Plaintiffs, PROOF OF SERVICE vs. Complaint: December 17, 2010 C.C. MOORE & CO., ENGINEERS, et al., Trial Date: June 10, 2013 Defendants. PROOF OF SERVICE I, Steven Rutkowski, declare as follows: I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. My business address is Hake Law, A Professional Corporation, 655 Montgomery St., Ste. 1000, San Francisco, California, 94111. 1 am over eighteen years old and not a party to this action. On the date set forth below, I served the following document(s) described as: NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER ON EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS AND MOTION TO STRIKE THE DECLARATION OF DAVID SCHWARTZ, M.D. IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT COLLINS ELECTRICAL COMPANY, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT QO BYU.S. MAIL: I am readily familiar with this office’s practices and procedures for collecting, processing, and depositing correspondence and other mail via the United States Postal Service. In the ordinary course of business, the foregoing documents were placed in a sealed envelope, postage pre-paid, and deposited with the United States Postal Service in the City and County of San Francisco, State of California, for delivery to the following address: 0 BY FEDERAL EXPRESS: | am readily familiar with this office’s practices and PROOF OF SERVICEHAKE Law, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION procedures for collecting, processing, and depositing correspondence and other mail via Federal Express. In the ordinary course of business, the foregoing documents were placed in a sealed envelope, postage pre-paid, and deposited with Federal Express in the City and County of San Francisco, State of California, for overnight delivery to the following address: oO BY FAX: | am readily familiar with this office’s practices and procedures for transmitting documents via facsimile. In the ordinary course of business, the foregoing documents were sent via facsimile to the following address: Oo BY PERSONAL SERVICE: | am readily familiar with this office’s practices and procedures for transmitting documents via personal service. In the ordinary course of business, the foregoing documents were placed in a sealed envelope and provided to Flash Messenger Service for immediate personal delivery to the following address: & BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE: In the ordinary course of business, the foregoing documents were served to all parties and counsel registered with LexisNexis File & Serve, as designated on the Transaction Receipt available on the LexisNexis website. 1 declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed July 3, 2013 at San Francisco, California. Uk Llitheot i Steven Rutkowski pene PROOF OF SERVICE