arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

kB ww a os Oo CC — Am te Fw te MN Be MW RY RM NM NY ON eo 4S A hw £ SB NS S SONJA E. BLOMQUIST, SBN #099341, sblomquist@lowball.com PAMELA Y. LOUIE, SBN #259391, plouile@lowball.com LOW, BALL & LYNCH ELECTRONICALLY 505 Monigomery Street, 7” Floor FILED San Francisco, California 94111-2584 Superior Court of California, Telephone (4i 5) 981-6630 County of San Francisco Facsimile (415) 399-1506 AUG 30 2013 Clerk of the Court Attorneys for Defendant 3 GIAMPOLINI & COMPANY Oe RAMON A aputy Olerk SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, Case No, CGC-10-273731 Plaintiffs, MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 1 GIAMPOLINI & COMPANY’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO REQUEST 48- HOUR DISCLOSURE OF WITNESSES AND DOCUMENTS ve ) ) ) ) } C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS, J Defendants as Reflected on Exhibit I y attached to the Summary Complaint herein; J and DOES 1-8500, } Judge: Hon. Teri L. Jackson ) ) ) ) } ) Dept.: 503 Trial Date: September 9, 2013 Complaint Filed: December 17, 2010 Defendants. TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Defendant GIAMPOLINI & COMPANY (“Giampolini”), before trial and selection of the} jury in the above-entitled action, moves this Court in imine for an order instructing plaintiffs and plaintiffs’ counsel that each party is to advise all other parties at least 48-hours in advance of the identity of each witness they will call at trial. Giampolini further requests that this court order each party to designate those documents it purports to use 48-hours prior to seeking to admit the documents into evidence or eliciting testimony concerning the documents. Furthermore, that the attorneys abstain from specifically referring to any documents until the opposing side has had the opportunity to request a hearing on its admissibility out of the jury’s presence. GIAMPOLINI & COMPANY'S MIL FOR 48-HOUR DISCLOSURE OF WITNESSES AND DOCUMENTS| \Werver7\gen-insW2040\SF{D00\GMP MELSIMIE | -48 He Disc.doeThe above orders will allow the parties to adequately prepare for trial. Some documents and testimony should be excluded. Disputed evidence should not be referred to in the presence of the jury until the court has issued a ruling. Equal application of the orders requested will ensure a faster trial and will avoid undue prejudice. Dated: August 36 5 2013 LOW, BALL & LYNCH Attorneys for Defendant GIAMPOLINI & COMPANY cnsuutt “2 < “GIAMPOLINI & COMPANY'S MIL FOR 48-HOUR DISCLOSURE OF WITNESSES AND DOCUMENTS \\Server7igen-ins\2040\SP1006\GMP MILs\MIL | - 48 Hr Dise.doc