arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

CIV-410 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Stale Bar number, and address): Alan R. Brayton, Esq (Bar # #73685) Brayton <> Purcell 222 Rush Landing Ro a NEY vate, CA 94948 TELEPHONE NO! (ays FAX NO, (Qptionan: ELECTRONICALLY E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional: . ATTORNEY FOR Wane): Plaintiffs, ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS i , FILED SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, couNTY oF San Francisco Soper Court of Calon ia street aponess: 400 McAllister Street FOR COURT USE ONLY LING ADDRESS: SEP 17 2013 omy and zi cone: San Francisco 94102 Clerk of the Court BRANCH NAME: BY: ALISON AGBAY Deputy Clerk PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS, et al. REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL CASE NUMBER: CGC-10-275731 Aconformed copy will not be returned by the clerk unless a method of return is provided with the document. This form may not be used for dismissal of a derivative action or a class action or of any party or cause of action Ina class action. (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.760 and 3.770.} 1, TO THE CLERK: Please dismiss this action as follows: a. (1) X] With prejudice (2) Without prejudice b. (1) Compiaint (2) Petition (3) Cross-complaint filed by (name): . on (date): (4) [_] Cross-complaint filed by (name): on (date): (8) Entire action of all il parties and at causes of action. it lated t to asbest fier December $, 1980 as t . Plaintiff hereby dismisses all allegations, if any, related to exposure to asbestos on or after December as to (©) EX] Other (specity)” defendants listed on attached "Exhibit A” and hereby amends his or her complaint(s) accordingly, 2, (Complete in all cases except family law cases.) - The coun [ did |_x_} did not waive court fees and costs for a party case. (This information may be oblained fram the clerk, If court fees and cosis were waived, the declaration on thep Date: August 27, 2013 ‘Al > for Alan R. Brayton ATTORNEY PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY) “it dismissal requested is of specified parties only of specified causes of action Attorney of party without attorney for: Only, of Gf Specie cross-complaints “only, £9 stale and wentty the panies, XJ Piaintitt/Petitioner Defendant/Respondent Cross-Complainant (SIGNATURE) 3. TO THE CLERK: Consent to the above dismissal is hereby given.** Date: > CTYPE OA PRINT NAME OF [X ] ATTORNEY PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY) (SIGNATURE) ve a bross-complaint — or Response {Family Lav) seeking i aflimative Attorney or party without attorney for: on (gis consume eeguired by ‘Gade of CM Pcie cecaen bat Plaintiff/Petitioner X_| Defendant/Respondent oF). Cross~Complainant (Te be completed by clerk) Dismissal entered as requested on (date): 5S Dismissal entered on (date): as to only (name): 6. Dismissal not entered as requested for the following reasons (specify): 7. & Attorney or party without attorney notified on (date): bd. Attorney or party without attorney not notified. Filing party failed to provide a copy to be conformed means to return conformed copy Date: Clerk, by , Deputy Paget of 2 Man ‘Gi Sil Procedure, § 581 eq Fort joist councl of Gallonda REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL. Gov. Coda, § 6565719; Gal Raise of Cou, ule a 1698 ‘Give430 (Rev. van. 1, 2013) roe ours. 3.90 ‘ LesisNexis® Automated California Judicial Council Forms“EXHIBIT A” A. TEICHERT & SON, INC. ADVANCE MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. ALBAY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY BALLIET BROS. CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor to AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., incorrectly sued as BAYER CROPSCIENCE., INC. BETA MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, L.P., now defunct CALIFORNIA DRYWALL CO. CUPERTINO ELECTRIC, INC. CLAUSEN-PATTEN, INC., A DISSOLVED CORPORATION COMMAIR MECHANICAL SERVICES CSK AUTO, INC. D.W. NICHOLSON CORPORATION D. ZELINSKY & SONS, INC. DURO DYNE CORPORATION EMIL J. WEBER ELECTRIC CO. FAIRMONT HOTEL COMPANY GIAMPOLINI & COMPANY THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY J.T, THORPE & SONS, INC. MALM METAL PRODUCTS, INC. MARSHCO AUTO PARTS, INC. McCLURE ELECTRIC, INC. MONSANTO COMPANY PACIFIC MECHANICAL CORPORATION PERINI CORPORATION PRIBUSS ENGINEERING, INC. RAYMOND INTERIOR SYSTEMS-NORTH RED TOP ELECTRIC CO. EMERY VILLE, INC. SWINERTON BUILDERS VAN-MULDER SHEET METAL, INC. WEBCOR BUILDERS, INC.ClV-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS, et al. CGC-10-275731 COURT'S RECOVERY OF WAIVED COURT FEES AND COSTS if a party whose court fees-and costs were initially waived has recovered or will recover $10,000 or more in value by way of settlement, compromise, arbitration award, mediation settlement, or other means, the court has a statutory lien on that recovery. The court may refuse to dismiss the case until the lien is satisfied, (Gov. Code, § 68637.) Decfaration Concerning Waived Court Fees 1. The court waived court fees and costs in this action for (name): 2. “ person named in item 1 is (check one below): not recovering anything of value by this action, . recovering less than $10,000 in value by this action. c. recovering $10,000 or more in value by this action. (If item 2c is checked, item 3 must be completed.) 3. Ail court fees and court costs that were waived in this action have been paid to the court (check one): Yes No | declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information above is true and correct. Date: ETYPE OF PRINT NAME OF ATTORNEY PARTY MAKING DECLARATION) (SIGNATURE) CIV-110 [Rev. January 1.2013} REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL Page 2 of 2 LexisNexis® Automated California Judictal Council Forms