On January 30, 2009 a
Stipulation,Agreement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Conte, Anthony,
and
3M Company,
All Asbestos Defendants See Scanned Documents,
Asbestos Defendants B*P As Reflected On Reflected,
Bnsf Railway Company,
Bucyrus International Inc,
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation,
Cbs Corporation, A Delaware Corporation,
Chrysler Llc,
Does 1-800, Inclusive,
Does 1-8500,
Garlock Sealing Technologies Llc,
General Electric Company,
Hennessy Industries Inc.,
Honeywell International, Inc.,
Honeywell International Inc., F K A Alliedsignal,,
J.T. Thorpe, Inc.,
J.T. Thorpe & Son, Inc.,
Macarthur Company,
Owens-Illinois, Inc.,
Parker Hannifin Corporation,
Plant Insulation Company,
Quintec Industries, Inc.,
The Budd Company,
Union Pacific Railroad Company,
Viacom And Not The Claims Against Cbs Corporation,
Viacom, Inc.,
Western Asbestos Company,
Western Macarthur Company,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
DAVID R. DONADIO, ESQ., SB aes ELECTRONICALLY
HARD M. GRANT, ESQ., S.B. #55677 .
BRAYTONSPURCELL LLP LLP Received Not Filed
ATTORNEYS AT LAW Superior Court of California,
222 Rush Landing Road County of San Francisdo
P.O. Box 6169 SEP 27 201
Novato, California 94948-6169 Clerk of the Cou
(415) 898-1555 BY: VANESSA WU
Deputy Clerk
Attomeys for Plaintiff
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
CO Oe IY AW Rh wD
11] ANTHONY CONTE,
12 Plaintiff,
ASBESTOS
No. CGC-09-275046
STIPULATION ALLOWING PLAINTIFF
TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND ORDER THERECN
13 ft vs.
4 ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P)
P.O 80x 6169
415) 8994555,
NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 949486169
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
272 RUSH LANDING ROAD
16 WHEREAS, this matter has been remanded to this Court by the California Court of
BRAYTONS PURCELL LLP
171) Appeal; and
18 WHEREAS, the Court of Appeal reversed this Court’s previous ruling denying leave to
19) amend plaintiff's complaint;
20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff and defendant HENNESSY
21 § INDUSTRIES, INC. (hereinafter "HENNESSY"), through their respective counsel a follows:
22 1. Plaintiff shall have fifteen days from the’ date this Court issues an order on this
23 | stipulation to file and serve an amended complaint consistent with the holdings of the Court of
24 | Appeal in Shields v. Hennessy Industries (2012) 205Cal.App.4th 782, and Bettencourt v.
25 || Hennessy Industries (2012)205 Cal.App.4th 1103.
26]
27H it
284 i
KUnjoredh10925.4tpt5STIP-ORD AMD CMP HENNES upd 1
STIPULATION ALLOWING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER THEREON2. HENNESSY shall have fifteen days trom the filing and service of the amended
2|| complaint to file a responsive pleading.
3
4]) Dated: § l 2¢f ] Ae BRAYTON**PURCELL LLP
5
6 a 2 fa
Richard M. Grant ( 55677)
7 Attomeys for Plaintiff
8
9 -
Dated: {- 3 O GORDON & REES LLP
10
n a Er"
By;
12 latthew G. Kleiner 241842)
Attorneys for Defendant
13 HENNESSY INDUSTRIES, ENC.
14
15
16 ORDER
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19}} Dated:
TERT L. JACKSON
20 Judge of the Superior Court
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
i Meyurech 10923 oKASTIP-ORD AND CMP HENNES wy 2
SOMES TIPULATION ALLOWING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER THEREON
Document Filed Date
September 27, 2012
Case Filing Date
January 30, 2009
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
DAVID R. DONADIO, ESQ., SB aes ELECTRONICALLY HARD M. GRANT, ESQ., S.B. #55677 . BRAYTONSPURCELL LLP LLP Received Not Filed ATTORNEYS AT LAW Superior Court of California, 222 Rush Landing Road County of San Francisdo P.O. Box 6169 SEP 27 201 Novato, California 94948-6169 Clerk of the Cou (415) 898-1555 BY: VANESSA WU Deputy Clerk Attomeys for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CO Oe IY AW Rh wD 11] ANTHONY CONTE, 12 Plaintiff, ASBESTOS No. CGC-09-275046 STIPULATION ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER THERECN 13 ft vs. 4 ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) P.O 80x 6169 415) 8994555, NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 949486169 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 272 RUSH LANDING ROAD 16 WHEREAS, this matter has been remanded to this Court by the California Court of BRAYTONS PURCELL LLP 171) Appeal; and 18 WHEREAS, the Court of Appeal reversed this Court’s previous ruling denying leave to 19) amend plaintiff's complaint; 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff and defendant HENNESSY 21 § INDUSTRIES, INC. (hereinafter "HENNESSY"), through their respective counsel a follows: 22 1. Plaintiff shall have fifteen days from the’ date this Court issues an order on this 23 | stipulation to file and serve an amended complaint consistent with the holdings of the Court of 24 | Appeal in Shields v. Hennessy Industries (2012) 205Cal.App.4th 782, and Bettencourt v. 25 || Hennessy Industries (2012)205 Cal.App.4th 1103. 26] 27H it 284 i KUnjoredh10925.4tpt5STIP-ORD AMD CMP HENNES upd 1 STIPULATION ALLOWING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER THEREON2. HENNESSY shall have fifteen days trom the filing and service of the amended 2|| complaint to file a responsive pleading. 3 4]) Dated: § l 2¢f ] Ae BRAYTON**PURCELL LLP 5 6 a 2 fa Richard M. Grant ( 55677) 7 Attomeys for Plaintiff 8 9 - Dated: {- 3 O GORDON & REES LLP 10 n a Er" By; 12 latthew G. Kleiner 241842) Attorneys for Defendant 13 HENNESSY INDUSTRIES, ENC. 14 15 16 ORDER 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19}} Dated: TERT L. JACKSON 20 Judge of the Superior Court 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i Meyurech 10923 oKASTIP-ORD AND CMP HENNES wy 2 SOMES TIPULATION ALLOWING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER THEREON