arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

Ceo YN DA HW Bw NY RN YNY RN KR NK NK See Be Be Be Be Be eB old AA FOS =F SCH ADA BW YH = Oo JEREMY D. HUIE, ESQ. (SBN 191145) jhuie@behblaw.com BASSI, EDLIN, HUIE & BLUM LLP 500 Washington Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 397-9006 Facsimile: (415) 397-1339 Attorneys for Defendant MALM METAL PRODUCTS, INC. ELECTRONICAL} FILED Superior Court of County of San 08/17/201 Clerk of the Cor BY-WILLIAM TRUPH Deputy SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, Plaintiffs, vs. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGEINEERS; Defendants as Reflected on exhibit 1 attached to the Summary Complaint herein; and DOES 1-8500, Defendants. 1363865 Case No. CGC-10-275731 DEFENDANT MALM METAL PRODUCTS, INC.’S JOINDER IN DEFENSE OPPOSITION TO TRIAL CONSOLIDATION Date: August 19, 2015 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept.: 613, Hon. Harold E. Kahn Trial Date: August 10, 2015 DEFENDANT MALM METAL PRODUCTS, INC.’S JOINDER IN DEFENSE OPPOSITION TO TRIAL CONSOLIDATION LYCm RN DH RB WN Boe ee ee An BR WN FS Oo 16 Defendant MALM METAL PRODUCTS, INC. (“MALM”) opposes Plaintiffs’ motion to consolidate the above-captioned case with three other cases for trial.’ MALM is a defendant in the above-captioned case only. MALM joins in defense opposition to trial consolidation, including without limitation the opposition filed by Defendant BALLIET BROS. CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, as though fully set forth herein. MALM reserves the right} to argue in opposition to Plaintiffs’ consolidation motion, even should the original filing defendant no longer remain in the action or no longer wish to oppose the motion. Date: August 10, 2015 BASSI, EDLIN, HUIE & BLUM LLP Attorntys for Deferidant MALM™METAL PRODUCTS, INC. ' The other cases are: Roman v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd., et al., No. CGC-10-275676; Barragan v. Thomas Dee Eng’g Co., et al., No. CGC-10-275713; and Fortner v. Thomas Dee Eng’g Co., et al., No. CGC-11-275935. 1363865 2 DEFENDANT MALM METAL PRODUCTS, INC.’S JOINDER IN DEFENSE OPPOSITION TO TRIAL CONSOLIDATIONSCO wm ND HW Fs WHY pv = Re: Robert Ross and Jean Ross v. Asbestos Defendants, et al. an Francisco County Superior Court Case No. CGC 10-275731 PROOF OF SERVICE —- ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA/COUNTY OF San Francisco Iam a citizen of the United States and an employee in the County of San Francisco. I am over the age of eighteen (18) years and not a party to the within action. My business address is BASSI, EDLIN, HUIE & BLUM LLP, 500 Washington Street, Suite 700, San Francisco, California 94111. On the date executed below, I electronically served the document(s) via File & ServeXpress, described below, on the recipients designated on the Transaction Receipt located on the File & ServeXpress website. DEFENDANT MALM METAL PRODUCTS, INC.’S JOINDER IN DEFENSE OPPOSITION TO TRIAL CONSOLIDATION On the following parties: PLEASE SEE SERVICE LIST PROVIDED BY FILE & SERVEXPRESS I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this document is executed on August 17, 2015, at San Francisco, California. Lbebbe AUBREY BUDGE 1363865 3 DEFENDANT MALM METAL PRODUCTS, INC.’S JOINDER IN DEFENSE OPPOSITION TO TRIAL CONSOLIDATION