arrow left
arrow right
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
  • ROBERT ROSS et al VS. C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

BRAYTON*PURCE! ATTORNEYS AT NOVATI CALIFORNIA 94948-6169 ALAN R. BRAYTON, ESQ., S.B. #73685 ELECTRONICALLY JAMES P. NEVIN, ESQ., S.B. #220816 FILED jnevin@braytonlaw.com BRAYTON*PURCELL LLP Superior Court of Galtromia, Attorneys at Law 222 Rush Landing Road 09/28/2016 P.O. Box 6169 ae fe Court Novato, California 94948-6169 , Deputy Clerk (415) 898-1555 Attorneys for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ROBERT ROSS and JEAN ROSS, ) ASBESTOS ) No. CGC-10-275731 Plaintiffs, ) ) EX PARTE APPLICATION TO ALLOW vs. ) FILING OF APPLICATION FOR ENTRY ) OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT C.C. MOORE & CO. ENGINEERS; ) Defendants as Reflected on Exhibit 1 ) attached to the Summary Complaint herein; ) Date: September 29, 2016 and DOES 1-8500. ) Time: 11:00 a.m. Dept.: 503, Hon. Garrett L. Wong Trial Date: None Action Filed: December 17, 2010 APPLICATION Plaintiffs hereby apply for an order of the Court directing the Clerk of the Court to allow the filing of Plaintiffs’ "APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS BARNES CONSTRUCTION CO., CINCINNATI VALVE COMPANY, DORN REFRIGERATION AND AIR CONDITIONING, JONES PLASTERING COMPANY, MIDSTATE MECHANICAL, INC., ROLLIE R. FRENCH, INC., AND S F L, INC." Plaintiffs also apply for an order that Judicial Council Form CIV-100 shall not be required to be filed by Plaintiffs instead of Plaintiffs’ long-form application, and that Form CIV- 100 shall not be required to be filed in conjunction with the above-reference applications on this, and any other applications for default judgment filed by Plaintiffs’ counsel. iit I Minjured.19349 pkhapp-xpt-file prove-up (FIRST DRAFT) wpa 1 IMD. EX PARTE APPLICATION TO ALLOW FILING OF APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT,Plaintiffs make this request based upon the good cause shown in the accompanying Declaration of James P. Nevin, and the Memorandum of Points and Authorities, and on the grounds that: 1. The Clerk of Court's September 26, 2016 rejection of Plaintiffs' filing was improper as it was predicated upon an incorrect assumption that the filing of an amended complaint subsequent to entry of default operates as an automatic nullification of the default; in fact, the amendment did not make any substantive change to the allegation against the defaulted defendants, and Plaintiffs may obtain judgment upon the complaint upon which they were defaulted. 2. The Clerk rejection for lack of the redundant use of Judicial Council Form CIV-100 is counter to long standing policy of the Clerk of Court to allow filing of long-form applications for prove-ups in complex litigation, such as asbestos litigation; to-wit, the relief requested in Plaintiffs’ proposed filing necessitates a long-form application. Any requirement to file form CIV-100 in addition to Plaintiffs' long-form application would be duplicative and unnecessary. Dated: September 27, 2016 BRAYTON“*PURCELL LLP By: /s/ James P. Nevin James P. Nevin Attorneys for Plaintiffs I Unjued19349\phhapp-ptfileprove-up (FIRST DRAFT). wpd 2 mp EX PARTE APPLICATION TO ALLOW FILING OF APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT,BRAYTON@PURCELL LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 222 RUSH LANDING ROAD POBOX 6169 NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6169 (415) 898-1555 0 DO IY DH A FR WN 10 PROOF OF SERVICE BY FI ERVEXPRE: Tam employed in the County of Marin, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and am not a party to the within action. My business address is 222 Rush Landing Road, P.O, Box 6169, Novato, California, 94948-6169. On September L%, 2016 I caused electronic service (E-Service) of the following documents: EX PARTE APPLICATION TO ALLOW FILING OF APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE TpGMENT TO ALLOW FILING OF APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT DECLARATION OF JAMES P. NEVIN IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION TO ALLOW FILING OF APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT DECLARATION OF CLAUDIA LUCIO IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION TO ALLOW FILING OF APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT [FROPOSED| ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' EX PARTE APPLICATION TO ALLOW TILING OF APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT on the interested parties in this action by causing File & ServeXpress E-service program to transmit a true copy thereof to the following party(ies): SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST _The above document was transmitted by File & ServeXpress E-Service and the transmission was reported as complete and without error. Executed on September, 2016 at Novato, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Me Can MA Docs Robert Ross and Jean Ross v. C.C. Moore and Co. Engineers _Inc., et al. San Francisco Superior Court Case No, CGC-10-275731 PROOF OF SERVICE BY E-SERVICEBrayton-Purcell Service List Date Created: 9/27/2016-3:12:46 PM Created by: LitSupport - ServiceList - , BPImport Matter Number: 19349.004 - Robert Ross Selman Breitman, LLP - San Francisco Spanos Przetak 475 14% Street, Suite 550 33 New Montgomery, 6" Floor Oakland, CA San Francisco, CA 84 4105 510-250- 500" “S10. 380-6354 (fax) 415-979-0400 415-979-2099 (fax) Defendants; Defendants: Spanos Przetak (SPAPRZ) Associated Insulation of California (ASSOC) Run By : Lucio, Claudia (CCL) 1